Recensioni su groundcover

Very easy setup and fully customizable retention without affecting cost as it runs on your own infrastructure

Commenti: Very good, we have been with them since the beginning of 2023 and after experiencing the likes of DataDog, Dynatrace and Instana they have been a breath of fresh air with VERY predictable and reasonable pricing and a support team that is very eager to help out when you need them. Even going above and beyond and advising on how to use the data that is gathered by them inside your infrastructure and notifying you on how future changes might affect the usage of that raw data from the deployed databases.

Aspetti positivi:

Easy setup, simple pricing model no hidden fees. Full control over retention without affecting cost. Mostly used eBPF integrations out of the box. Simple UI that gets directly to the point.

Aspetti negativi:

Some eBPF integrations not yet available

Alternative considerate: Datadog, IBM Instana, Dynatrace, New Relic e Honeycomb

Perché passare a groundcover: Simple and reliable pricing structure and they delivered on their eBPF zero-instrumentation promise for most of the services and provided a very attractive open-source alternative (oTEL) for the things that are not covered by eBPF.

Advanced Observability Made Easy with Groundcover

Aspetti positivi:

Just wanted to share my thoughts on Groundcover since I’ve been using it for a bit, and I think it’s pretty awesome. Super User-Friendly First off, the UI is super clean and easy to get around. You can see all your components in one spot, which makes life so much easier. No more getting lost in menus—everything you need is right there! Easy Log Access Accessing logs is a breeze, too. They’re right in the UI, so if something goes wrong, you can just pull them up and dive into troubleshooting without jumping through hoops. Simple Alerts Setting up alerts is really straightforward. The built-in Grafana integration is a nice touch, and you can use some cool queries to customize your alerts. It feels good to have everything tailored just how you want it. Dashboard Fun Building dashboards is super fun and easy! You can create custom ones that display exactly what you’re tracking. Whether it’s performance metrics or system health, you can set it all up to fit your needs perfectly. Customization Galore One of the best parts? You can customize so many features! It really lets you tweak things to match your workflow, which is a big win in my book. Overall Vibe So yeah, Groundcover is a solid choice for monitoring. It’s user-friendly, has easy log access, makes alerting simple, and lets you create awesome dashboards. If you’re looking to up your observability game, definitely give it a shot!

Aspetti negativi:

There are a couple of things that could use some work. Sometimes, the queries can be a bit slow to pull up data, and they’ll randomly get stuck. Also, the filter sections can feel a bit complicated, navigating them isn't always the easiest.

Looking forward to the upgrades

Aspetti positivi:

liked the traces functionality, helps me track all requests that are sampled, gives an overall idea of any new change going live to prod.

Aspetti negativi:

Data consistency is something that can be improved going forward. Makes it difficult to rely at times.

Simplifying Observability with a Single Pane of Glass

Commenti: Groundcover has been an excellent addition to our toolkit! We successfully replaced both New Relic and Kibana, streamlining our observability stack and enhancing visibility across the board. The real-time metrics and seamless setup made the transition effortless, and the intuitive dashboards provide a comprehensive view of our system’s health at a glance. Groundcover not only improved performance insights but also reduced our operational overhead. It’s a powerful solution for teams looking for efficient, straightforward observability without the complexity of traditional tools. Highly recommended!

Aspetti positivi:

The ease of setup, efficient performance insights, and reduced operational overhead make Groundcover a powerful and worthwhile solution

Aspetti negativi:

The UI could use some refinement, as it doesn’t yet match the polish of other tools in the market

Lightweight and Effective Observability Tool for Kubernetes

Commenti: Groundcover has been a great addition to our DevOps toolkit. It’s easy to implement and integrates smoothly with Kubernetes, delivering efficient, real-time insights with minimal overhead. The proactive alerts and reliable monitoring have improved our ability to resolve issues quickly, enhancing application stability. Plus, the responsive support team adds to the positive experience.

Aspetti positivi:

Groundcover is highly user-friendly, with an intuitive interface that makes setup and daily use easy, even for newcomers. Its eBPF-based approach delivers efficient, real-time insights without high resource costs. Integration is seamless, allowing it to fit smoothly into our existing stack, and we rely on it frequently due to reliable anomaly detection and proactive alerts. Customer support is also responsive and knowledgeable, making the experience even better.

Aspetti negativi:

While excellent for Kubernetes, Groundcover's limited support for traditional on-premise and hybrid environments makes it less suited for non-cloud-native or legacy systems.

My Go-To Observablity Platform!

Commenti: amazing!!
setup was very quick and easy , their support team is great and responsive , and the product just keeps growing in the best directions

Aspetti positivi:

ease of use , support, pricing, wide coverage

Aspetti negativi:

no custom reports options , Grafana is not the easiest to manage

Alternative considerate: Datadog e Logz.io

Perché scegliere groundcover: costs and performance consideration as well as support engagements.

Software precedente: Elastic Stack

Perché passare a groundcover: costs and performance consideration as well as management overhead

GC All-in-1

Commenti: Overall experience is good. Been using groundcover for last 40 days. Couple of issues like screen resolution and when the time range is large, it says unable to fetch data please reduce time range. I worked on OTEL integration and alert migration. Faced few issue while writing alert queries but GC team helped with it.

Aspetti positivi:

Getting all in one place. UI is very good and easy to use. Most liked feature is where I get to select "ONLY" while filtering out. Another thing I get to monitor all resources and infrastructure at one place which helps in monitoring our services.

Aspetti negativi:

Screen resolution is the issue, sometimes I can not fully see the traces or logs page which come in right bottom. In monitor I am able to see them properly but when I open in laptop, I dont get to see them properly.

Great Product with Awesome Value and Room to Grow

Commenti: Overall, groundcover is a good product with potential. While it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of more developed options, its affordability makes it a solid choice. Looking forward to future updates that enhance its features.

Aspetti positivi:

The pricing is a major advantage, offering good value for the features available. It's an efficient solution for those on a budget.

Aspetti negativi:

Compared to other full-fledged products, there are areas that could use improvement. Some functionalities feel limited.

Groundcover review

Aspetti positivi:

Facebook's Groundcover initiative stands out as a significant innovation in building scalable, efficient, and open-source cloud-native observability tools. What I appreciate most about it is how it seeks to empower developers with deep insights into their infrastructure and applications without compromising on performance or scalability. By focusing on providing real-time, granular visibility into cloud environments, Groundcover helps teams identify issues faster and optimize systems more effectively. Additionally, its commitment to open-source allows a broader community to contribute, learn, and benefit from cutting-edge observability practices. This fosters collaboration and accelerates innovation in cloud-native solutions.

Aspetti negativi:

What I like least about Facebook's Groundcover is the potential complexity that comes with implementing and managing it in large-scale environments. While it's designed to offer deep observability, the extensive amount of data it gathers can sometimes overwhelm teams if they don't have the proper strategies in place to handle and analyze that information efficiently. Additionally, for smaller teams or organizations without dedicated DevOps resources, the learning curve and maintenance efforts required to fully leverage Groundcover’s features could be daunting, making it harder for them to extract meaningful value quickly.

Covering all the grounds

Commenti: Overall a solid product that is comparable to other big name monitoring solutions. Expert level support and always able and willing to help when needed.

Aspetti positivi:

New features often, comparable to monitoring apps like datadog, simple to read charts, and intuitive UI

Aspetti negativi:

UI can be sluggish at times, occasional errors when trying to load pages

Comprehensive and Efficient Monitoring with groundcover

Commenti: groundcover offers an impressive experience from the user interface to the user experience. It stands out for its eBPF-powered technology, allowing comprehensive observability in modern production environments without compromising cost, granularity, or scale. The platform's ease of use and customer support are highly rated, adding to its overall appeal as a reliable monitoring solution

Aspetti positivi:

The most standout aspect of groundcover is its compatibility and native integration with EKS (Elastic Kubernetes Service), which enables rapid installation and provides a complete observability platform. It's particularly efficient in terms of resource usage, maintaining a minimal footprint on the infrastructure.

Aspetti negativi:

Groundcover thrives in Kubernetes (K8s) environments, delivering top-notch performance. While it may not be as immediate in non-EKS settings, it still supports various integrations.

Groundcover: zero effort observability

Commenti: We utilize Groundcover for our infrastructure's observability. The cost-benefit tradeoff has been remarkable. With minimal effort, we've gained a comprehensive understanding of our infrastructure's inner workings, significantly enhancing our knowledge of the cluster's activities. Additionally, we've configured security-related alerts using NGINX logs as the data source, further bolstering our monitoring capabilities.

Aspetti positivi:

Groundcover has significantly impacted our small team, offering immediate insights into our EKS cluster within just 10 minutes. Its GitOps-compatible configuration seamlessly integrates into our workflow. The support via the Slack channel is outstanding, with the team being highly responsive and patient, consistently providing replies in under an hour.

Aspetti negativi:

The current dashboards and alerts in Groundcover, which utilize an embedded Grafana, certainly deliver impressive functionalities. However, exploring a unique approach developed by Groundcover itself could potentially improve the product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Alternative considerate: Datadog

Perché passare a groundcover: Ease of use, configuration and installation. Convenient pricing model.

Amazing Product

Commenti: Amazing experience from the UI to the UX, very recommended

Aspetti positivi:

Liked how native groundcover is with EKS, can be installed in a couple of minutes and provides a full observability platform. It’s also low on resources and take an a minimal additional footprint on the infrastructure.

Aspetti negativi:

groundcover’s bread and butter is still K8s. for outside K8s they support a lot of intergrations but the experience is not as immediate as inside out EKS environment

Groundcover is one of the kind

Aspetti positivi:

We liked the idea of hosting data in our cloud account and at the same time having the ability to use the service as SaaS. We also liked the ability to have fully managed observability service as such a low cost.

Aspetti negativi:

groundcover services are still maturing. We had to request couple of features that do not exist yet.

Alternative considerate: Amazon CloudWatch e Prometheus

Best APM solution that just works

Commenti: It was very refreshing experience to setup such tool so quickly and get value out of it even quicker. Free plan is perfect for evaluation, even month-long, as the only limitation is a number of seats.

Aspetti positivi:

It is super easy to install (installer is clever enough to ask about kubernetes node taints required to be able to provision all nodes), just few steps in small cli tool. All the data is aggregated and displayed in meaningful way right at the front page, no need to spend hours learning documentation on how setup and use the tool. Very intuitive tool, focused on providing insight into health / state of k8s cluster and services and it does it really well. Historical data (events, logs, traces, metrics) allows you to quickly figure out issues that happened last night leaving no room for guess-work.

Aspetti negativi:

At this point it is missing eBPF support for MSSQL, navigating through distributed traces could be improved (group them by transaction type and aggregate based on that).

Groundcover - A Premier Observability Solution

Commenti: Overall, my experience with Groundcover has been extremely positive. It has revolutionized the way I approach system monitoring and analytics. The depth of insights and the ease of uncovering critical data points have significantly improved the efficiency of our operations.

Aspetti positivi:

My experience with Groundcover has been overwhelmingly positive, primarily due to its exceptional efficiency and clarity in observability. The user interface stands out with its intuitive design, making navigation and data interpretation seamless. The real-time data monitoring and analytics capabilities are top-notch, providing valuable insights into system performance with remarkable accuracy.

Aspetti negativi:

One area where Groundcover falls short is in its provision of node-specific views. While it excels in overall system observability, the solution lacks the granularity needed for detailed analysis of individual nodes. This limitation can be a significant drawback for complex systems where pinpointing issues at the node level is crucial.

Groundcover - simple and robust solution for monitoring purposes

Commenti: Overall i would really recommend to think about using it as observability solution at your company. It is really robust and operates smoothly

Aspetti positivi:

It's a very useful tool to help monitor, store logs and metrics. For sure i would like to mention their very helpful support that can help with anything groundcover related.

Aspetti negativi:

To be honest i would have to be very picky to state any true downsides of groundcover

Pretty impressive when using with kubeflow

Commenti: Overall, groundcover has been a solid choice for keeping track of our data pipelines and logs in Kubeflow. As someone still in the learning phase, it’s been really helpful in making complex processes easier to monitor. The only thing is that the dashboard can get complicated at times due to so many logs being tracked. But, the search functionality gives clear indications. So, it's all set for me

Aspetti positivi:

What I liked the most about groundcover is how easily it integrates with Kubeflow for monitoring data pipelines. The real-time log tracking and observability features are a big plus, especially when dealing with complex workflows. It simplifies tracking down issues by giving clear insights into what’s happening at each stage of the pipeline. The interface is intuitive, which made it easier for me, even as an intern, to get the hang of it quickly.

Aspetti negativi:

One downside I noticed is that the tool can be a bit resource-intensive, especially when running multiple simultaneous jobs. It could slow things down if the infrastructure isn't strong enough, which is something to keep in mind. I personally haven't faced such an issue but have heard from my fellow-mates

Tool for observability

Commenti: Very good - I doesn't have to care about things like grafana or prometheus

Aspetti positivi:

* easy to setup * monitor all HTTP traffic * nice dashboard

Aspetti negativi:

* missing filtering on http traces * network traces should have view where one column shot "Host" header

Great and robust tool to migrate to!

Commenti: Groundcover has been a valuable addition to our monitoring toolkit. The ease of setup, combined with insightful telemetry capabilities, has significantly improved our ability to track and troubleshoot in testing and production environments. It provides the flexibility and data visualization we need, making it easier to maintain a stable, high-performing system.

Aspetti positivi:

One of the standout features of Groundcover is how straightforward it is to set up telemetry metrics for Playwright with Grafana integration. The platform makes it remarkably easy to configure and visualize performance metrics, allowing our team to monitor test environments and application behaviors in real time without hassle.

Aspetti negativi:

While generally effective, there are minor aspects that could use a bit of polishing for a more seamless experience. Sometimes some dashboards take some time to populate and page sometimes needs to be refreshed, which is just annoying but fine overall.

Amazing visibility across all of our cluster

Aspetti positivi:

I liked the visibility I have as a developer to investigate real-life issues across all of our customers' deployments. With GroundCover we're able to proactively find issues in our customers' environments, and fix them before they affect them.

Aspetti negativi:

Our customers are divided into multiple different clusters, and the view in GroundCover is per cluster - so we need to move between clusters to see the whole scope of the issue (although most of the time looking at one of the clusters is enough to identify issues). I hope they'll add the ability to aggregate all clusters in some view in the future.

Groundcover review

Aspetti positivi:

Easy to navigate and search logs. Shows good metrics pods-wise

Aspetti negativi:

Hard to find the details of a specific log

fine tool, will be even greater while improving

Aspetti positivi:

all I need in one place: metrics, logs, traces etc.

Aspetti negativi:

history limited to 2 days not many protocol supported

Product has long onboarding time

Aspetti positivi:

A lot of important data is exposed, this helps a lot to debug our production

Aspetti negativi:

As a new user i find it hard to get into all of the abilities i have in groundcover

Observability made easy

Aspetti positivi:

The ease of deployment, the platform, availability of majority of the features. And constant feature releases.

Aspetti negativi:

Nothing as such. The team is constantly improving and bringing in new features.