--- description: Scopri le funzionalità di EasyPQQ, i dettagli del prodotto, chi utilizza il software e quali sono i prodotti suggeriti. Attraverso le recensioni di utenti verificati potrai capire com’è la user experience, l’assistenza post-vendita e molto altro. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: EasyPQQ - Prezzi, recensioni, informazioni - Capterra Italia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software per offerte commerciali](/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) > [EasyPQQ](/software/132509/easypqq) # EasyPQQ Canonical: https://www.capterra.it/software/132509/easypqq Pagina: 1/3\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/132509/easypqq?page=2) > Software di gestione delle proposte e delle offerte progettato per risparmiare tempo, migliorare la qualità e aiutarti a ricevere più proposte di lavoro. > > Conclusione: valutazione di **4.4/5** stelle assegnate da 32 utenti. Miglior punteggio per il parametro **Lo consiglieresti?**. ----- ## Panoramica ### Chi utilizza EasyPQQ? Qualsiasi settore che è tenuto a formulare qualsiasi tipo di proposta o offerta, tra cui: edilizia, assistenza sanitaria, reclutamento, sicurezza, servizi finanziari, settore legale, servizi di consulenza. ## Statistiche e valutazioni | Parametro | Valutazione | Dettaglio | | **Nel complesso** | **4.4/5** | 32 Recensioni | | Facilità d'uso | 4.3/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Assistenza clienti | 4.8/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Rapporto qualità-prezzo | 4.3/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Funzionalità | 4.2/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Percentuale di raccomandazione | 90% | (9/10 Lo consiglieresti?) | ## Informazioni sul fornitore - **Azienda**: Propeller Studios - **Area geografica**: Hitchin, UK - **Anno di fondazione**: 2001 ## Contesto commerciale - **Prezzo di partenza**: 7695,00 USD - **Pubblico target**: 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementazione e piattaforme**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Android (mobile) - **Lingue supportate**: inglese - **Paesi disponibili**: Regno Unito, Stati Uniti ## Funzionalità - Controllo accessi/Autorizzazioni - Controllo della versione - Gestione del flusso di lavoro - Gestione della knowledge base - Gestione delle richieste d'offerta - Gestione di documenti - Libreria di contenuti - Modelli - Ricerca/Filtro - Strumenti collaborativi - Tracciato di controllo ## Opzioni di supporto - Email/Help desk - Assistenza telefonica ## Categoria - [Software per offerte commerciali](https://www.capterra.it/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) ## Categorie correlate - [Software per offerte commerciali](https://www.capterra.it/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) - [Software di gestione documentale](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30063/document-management/software) ## Alternative 1. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.it/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (5738 reviews) 2. [Docusign](https://www.capterra.it/software/121506/docusign) — 4.7/5 (9297 reviews) 3. [Box](https://www.capterra.it/software/148766/box) — 4.4/5 (5627 reviews) 4. [Jotform](https://www.capterra.it/software/158456/jotform-4-0) — 4.7/5 (2845 reviews) 5. [PandaDoc](https://www.capterra.it/software/131735/pandadoc) — 4.5/5 (1243 reviews) ## Recensioni ### "Generally an easy and convenient way of writing tenders let down by several annoying bugs." — 3.0/5 > **Patrick** | *12 maggio 2017* | E-learning | Tasso di raccomandazione: 7.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: - Clear layout - Easy to use - Can customise the main menu - Great way to store stock answers/general company information - Visual reporting feature - Having multiple users makes it easy to divide up bid work between staff - Branding documents is easy - Search All feature saves vast amounts of time when searching for information - Collateral feature is really useful for storing key documents - Support service always very quick to sort out any reported issues > > **Inconvenienti**: - Text editor can be very buggy - have lost entire answers before - Exporting - often moves bullets points when exporting to word and tables often have to be redrawn on word because of how they appear on the page - Sometimes won't allow use to copy and paste images in to the text box - When copying and pasting text we're able to format the text (e.g. not make it bold) - Search All feature doesn't search similar phrases - need to search word for word > > It has made bid writing much more efficient as well as acting as great of storing bid information. It has also been a really useful way of tracking bids - particular with the visual reporting on the dashboard. The ability to have all bids and bidding information in one place has been the greatest benefit to us. ----- ### "Great submissions tool which saves us time and resources" — 4.0/5 > **Trudy** | *8 maggio 2017* | Industria edilizia | Tasso di raccomandazione: 9.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: We can put together any professional document in house (not just tenders and PQQ's,) which for a small company like ours saves us a lot of money in external graphics companies. We can also search all our previous answers, which enables us to fill in most questionnaires quickly, saving resources. Because of the way it is set up, it enables us to pull together the main elements of a bid using an administrator, which for us is a much better use of resource-giving our directors and managers a head start from which to work. Since implementing the system our documents are much more professional, and we are more successful with our bids. > > **Inconvenienti**: Like any software, you only get out what you put in, so keeping things up to date is essential. But this is true of any system. Sometimes things that you think would be intuitive aren't, but they are really good at listening to suggestions regarding improvements and bringing these into the system, and implementing new features to keep the system up to date. > > Increased win rations on PQQ's and Bids, reductions in marketing budget going externally to graphics companies, and increased speed in responding to enquiries. ----- ### "A user friendly piece of software built by bid managers for bid managers." — 5.0/5 > **Laura** | *9 maggio 2017* | Industria edilizia | Tasso di raccomandazione: 10.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: The process of importing the original bid document and using this to create the structure for the response is a great time saver and reduces the frequency of errors that might otherwise occur (for example, if you were keying in each question). I'm looking forward to using the Word text editor for formatting responses. This additional functionality will make document creation and formatting much easier. The project management tool provides an excellent dashboard for checking progress and allocating questions to casual users is a real bonus. It allows people to contribute their responses without requiring a log-in and full access to the system, and can be accessed from a link in an email. Really user-friendly and quick. Having a one-stop shop for the bid process from the very beginning to the final creation of the document and everything in between undoubtedly creates efficiency, which is vital to the all too often time-starved bidding programme. Access to all previous answers, which can be ranked according to previous scores, saves time and results in a higher quality library of answers. > > **Inconvenienti**: I find the cover pages and separator pages a little tricky to navigate and change when updating the style on a document. I haven't spent a great deal of time on this element of the document creation process, so it could come down to practice makes perfect\! The contents page is rather inflexible. It would be great if you could either edit the table of contents itself, or highlight words in the question to include (rather than including the whole question, which can be too lengthy). > > Very easy to use once you're up and running, and really well supported by the team at Propeller. ----- ### "The system is good value for money" — 4.0/5 > **Gill** | *17 maggio 2017* | Ingegneria civile | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: 1. The system is easy to use we have lots of staff as designated users for a wide range of applications 2. It does everything that we need it to do 3. Easy PQQ is an effective tool to help the business develop and track leads and business relationships 4. The response from the Propeller support team is always quick and efficient and we are pleased to note that some of our system improvement suggestions have been introduced > > **Inconvenienti**: there is an element of rigidity in the reporting - so in order to set up a contact, a specific job title must be entered - which might be a one off and then unless you recall that specific title the name would not come up in reporting. An element of human thought process is required. > > Customer relationship management is much more efficient than the previous system we worked with ----- ### "Company output at the beginning but also at the end of the construction process - very impressive" — 5.0/5 > **Nick** | *8 maggio 2017* | Industria edilizia | Tasso di raccomandazione: 10.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: The impression that the output provides to the end client is very professional and the system itself is easy to use. I use the system to provide manuals to clients at the end of a construction project and this in l ine with the pre construction documentation is great as it shows a consistency of documentation which we are in control of. I like the way that the outputs can be adapted to suit any client requirements in documentation. All in all the system in my opinion is excellent. > > **Inconvenienti**: I think the updates that are always ongoing are key to making this even more user friendly, I like the fact that prior to your word editor update we were slightly restricted as to what we could do with the software, For me when creating documents as PDFs I would like to see it where the header page can incorporate the pdf within it rather than having a blank page but I guess this is something that is just the way it is. > > Consistency in documentation throughout the construction process which is great in the eyes of the end client so this has been a massive positive for me. ----- Pagina: 1/3\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/132509/easypqq?page=2) ## Link - [Visualizza su Capterra](https://www.capterra.it/software/132509/easypqq) ## Questa pagina è disponibile nelle seguenti lingue | Lingua | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Dati strutturati