Da 18 anni aiutiamo le aziende
a scegliere i migliori software

Informazioni su TeamCity

Server di integrazione continua pronto all'uso, estensibile e intuitivo per gli sviluppatori.

Ulteriori informazioni su TeamCity

Aspetti positivi:

Easy to configure per instance CI /CD options. Can integrate with various frameworks.

Aspetti negativi:

Learning curve can be annoying especially if you don't have support within your team. It takes time to master the tool.

Valutazioni di TeamCity

Punteggio medio

Facilità d'uso
4,1
Servizio clienti
4,3
Caratteristiche
4,3
Rapporto qualità-prezzo
4,3

Lo consiglieresti?

8,4/ 10

TeamCity ha una valutazione complessiva di 4,6 stelle su 5, calcolata sulla base di 49 recensioni degli utenti di Capterra.

Hai già usato TeamCity?

Condividi la tua esperienza con altri acquirenti.

Filtra le recensioni (49)

shaik
shaik
Associate Software Engineer (India)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
, 201-500 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Best tool for build configuration,build history, and system maintenance in real time applications

5,0 7 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

Every enterprise business uses this tool for maintaining their services enabled and establish the best business flow. All the services that are being build via Mule can be available via team city to be deployed.Its features include build history, user management and system maintenance. Build history has excellent feature of holding the various build version that are deployed earlier.Use service messages in your build scripts, interact via REST API, or create plugins for TeamCity using Open API. User Management has different ways of user authentication, and a log with all user actions for the transparency which can be used for tracking all activity on the server.Best feature is Version Control System(VCS) in which Team city in a single build it can take source code from different VCS Repositories.All the versions history is available environmental wise.

Aspetti negativi:

The least of this software is there are some additional features required for the versions to avail across different enviroments like manual build configurations process can be avoided for the lower environments and UI part can be increased looking for new enhancements

Eric
Systems Engineer II (USA)
Proprietà immobiliari, 10.000+ dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Teamcity

5,0 3 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

I am able to successfully manage over 600 projects in Teamcity in my environment. Updates are a breeze and downtime has been damn near zero in the five or six years I've used this product. The build configs are super flexible however I've not used another product so I'm not sure how my experience compares to the next.

Aspetti negativi:

I'm not a huge fan of the experimental UI for some views but for other items I prefer it. I'm often switching back and forth between the two UIs

Alternative considerate: Jenkins

Perché passare a TeamCity: I wasn't part of that conversation as it was before my time but probably because we are an enterprise and require that level of support.

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Software informatici, 2-10 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Nice Integrated CI

3,0 6 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

It connects well with other JetBrains tools.

Aspetti negativi:

It is not as popular as Jenkins so does not have as many plugins and the community using it is a lot smaller.

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Servizi bancari, 5.001-10.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Great option for CI/CI, but on the more expensive side

5,0 9 mesi fa

Aspetti positivi:

Great UI and very easy to setup and manage. Great integration if you are already in the Jetbrains ecosystem

Aspetti negativi:

More expensive than other industry alternatives like Jenkins

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Software informatici, 1.001-5.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Excellent tool to build your Application with confidence for continious Integration

5,0 6 anni fa

Commenti: We can solve a lot of problems using teamcity as it is one of the continuous integration tool which helps in never ending business success story. As it is been used for deploying our services to the server very easily. We can have teamcity configure with different various tools like ant maven which help us in continious integration process. Best of this it helps us understand where our build process went wrong and root cause for the failure rather than manual intervention in trouble shoot it directly show the issue we can dig the process and resolve the issue from there onwards and UI part is much more flexible so that we can organise as per our requirement

Aspetti positivi:

The good thing i always like with the teamcity is its cross platform means we can configure agents of other OS types so it can build anything easily. It is Good integration with variosu different frameworks and it has various methodologies that can be used as a part of your application development and code dump. It also have an amazing feature of supporting the extension via plugin mechanism we can also integrate with other popular tools such as artifactory plugin or we can write our own. When ever a new build failed teamcity has a special feature of trouble shoot and provide us the root cause for the failure. It has a very user friendly interface which is very easy for the navigation and understanding the standard of each options in the panel. It is an opensource product and a happy news is startup are eligible for the 50% discount on the package

Aspetti negativi:

There is nothing much least about this but there are few drawback like for a single person holding project teamcity is not right choice.Upgrading the teamcity is very lengthy process and consumes large amount of time. The logs that are being generated during the build process can be made much more beautiful with UI changes

Gurleen
Gurleen
Software Engineer (India)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 10.000+ dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

TeamCity - A platform to approach Continuous Integration and Delivery.

5,0 6 anni fa

Commenti: TeamCity By JetBrains provide the hassle free Continuous Integration & Delivery. The freeware license come with up to 100 build configuration and 3 build agent are enough to check the feasibility study of your product. The powerful build CI & smart configuration make it enterprise like DevOps tool.

Aspetti positivi:

TeamCity by JetBrains is one of the best and simple tool to manage the build and Integration. The powerful integration features out of the box make it unique and operation team first choice. The DevOps approach helps in continuous Integration & Delivery. Smart Configuration feature like project hierarchy, in-build templates, build chains & dependencies split the build sequence in multiple step to serve in simplex form. The Version Control Systems integrate the process in comprehensive way. Build History is also helpful in tracking the issue & let us allow in tracking the changes in the development process. Statistics of build history and test result help in generating the reports.

Aspetti negativi:

There are numbers of In-build configuration plugins for cloud integrations like Amazon, Azure, vSphere, Kubernetes and many more but cluster and creating the plugin for on-premises infrastructures is really a big and complex task to do with the TeamCity without the help of expertise.

Nicholas
Nicholas
Software Engineer (Sudafrica)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Gestione delle risorse, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Great DevOps tool

5,0 3 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

Highly customizable pipelines, supporting multiple build steps with intelligent links and flows between them. Integration with Azure and Octopus Deploy are easy.

Aspetti negativi:

Integration with Azure could be deepened, as at the moment it is done via an ad in rather then being natively supported.

Christopher
Christopher
Independent Business Owner (USA)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Software informatici, 2-10 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Team City, My Personal Experience

5,0 6 anni fa

Commenti: My experience with TeamCity is great, and I would recommend it to any developer looking for an enterprise build server without cost.

Aspetti positivi:

Personally, I've used Jenkins, Team Foundation Server (DevOps), and a few others. For continuous integration, and multi-platform tool/build agent deployment nothing beats JetBrains TeamCity. Any kind of compiler, build tool, or plain application can be assimilated into your build model using JetBrains TeamCity. Best of all the application is free, the only limitation being the number of builds and branding.

Aspetti negativi:

My only issue would be it's heavy memory footprint, but that's due to the java run-time. If you use Visual Studio 2017, and TeamCity simultaneously there's going to be a lack of performance.

Ekta
Ekta
Programmer Analyst (USA)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Great tool for CI

5,0 7 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

We manage all build configurations, deployments triggers, automated tests triggers through Team City. It is the best tool, I have used till now. It allows you to clone projects, mute/investigate failing tests, pause triggers.

Aspetti negativi:

You need some time to master the use of team city. There is a lot to learn if you are new to team city. But with time and practice, you are good to go.

Vasyl
Vasyl
Speaker (Ucraina)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 501-1.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Must have for continuous integration!

5,0 6 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

It's easy to use (for it specialists), it has clean and friendly interface, it's very customizable

Aspetti negativi:

Have nothing to say about cons regarding this software

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Not an easy tool, but does the job

4,0 7 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

It does its job, and once you've set it up it's pretty solid. Agents and server have never needed a reboot as far as I know, and upgrades are quick enough. The integration with the VCS (SVN where I work) can let you keep track of what you have down the pipeline and, if you use the right tracking tool and add ticket numbers to the commit comments, you might find useful seeing what brought to that commit. If you often create new projects, the template feature can enormously speed up the process.

Aspetti negativi:

It's very very easy to screw up. It gives you quite enough rope to hang yourself and your whole team twice, like creating dependencies among builds so that a simple commit can make the agents run for hours, or other amenities where you're not really sure what's the code you're building from (or, you might even be sure, but wrong!) If you're not well organized and don't know your way around the myriads of configurations, you may well end up not knowing what features you are deploying. It really needs some serious study before using it in production, and since it's not something you configure everyday, it's not easy to keep trained. In this perspective, the template feature will make you forget what's going on. Sadly, it's the only CI/CD tool I've ever used, so I can't compare it to anything else.

Dushyant
Software Engineer (India)
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 10.000+ dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Integrates well with existing workflows, but access management is a pain

4,0 2 anni fa

Commenti: The integrability is a major plus point, and it has taken away a major blocker of manually ensuring sonar and build validation is passed before PRs are merged to avoid code breakage. It can further see some improvement so as to make the process faster and more streamlined

Aspetti positivi:

Teamcity allows us to implement CI CD pipelines for PR validation, by ensuring sonar checks are complete and builds pass before a PR is allowed to be merged. It integrates well with our VCS, Stash (Bitbucket Cloud) to ensure a Teamcity flag is present and applied before a PR is merged.The process is reliable and consistent, and works for new repos and configurations as well

Aspetti negativi:

The admin panel is cluttered and hard to move around, with confusing mnemonics for different validation jobs. Access granting is also unclear.One major pain point is that TC doesn't allow manual trigger of first PR build, and the process takes a lot of time, reducing efficiency.

Adrian
Proprietor (Germania)
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 2-10 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

A big time saver

5,0 2 anni fa

Commenti: I just love it. It saves us a lot of time, and makes every

Aspetti positivi:

- Before using Teamcity, deployments took about 30 minutes and had to be performed during maintenance intervals. Now we can deploy to production servers during the day if necessary. - Running tests can take a while, so it might be forgotten if someone has to do it manually. Teamcity automates this, so that we don't even have to think about running them again.

Aspetti negativi:

It's hard to say. Teamcity is really well polished, so I have very few and only minor suggestions. The only big downside to using TeamCity is that the initial setup takes a lot of time. But that's not not Teamcity's fault and the time is well invested.

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Ricerche di mercato, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Not brilliant but OK

4,0 3 anni fa

Commenti: Better than some other CI tools, liked the support for branching in Teamcity. (Previously even forked off an OpenSource CI product - that was a very expencive solution.)
Pretty reasonable product, but overhead of having own infrastructure, and always wanting more BuildAgents, made moving to AzurePipelines a more attractive proposition.

Aspetti positivi:

Configuration and ability to quickly set up new builds, nice integration into GitHub and other tools

Aspetti negativi:

Overly complex, I could never create a build without making a mistake, and having to go back and fix it up... Always got something wrong, although I have used it for around 10 years. Moved to Azure pipelines due to reduce cost, don't think it's any easier, but the build scripts are now in VersionControl

Laura
Softwaredeveloper (Germania)
Salute, benessere e fitness, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Flexible CI tool

5,0 3 anni fa

Commenti: Very stable CI tool with very low maintenance.

Aspetti positivi:

For smaller teams with less than 100 build configurations it is free of charge. It provides either an UI or an own language (Kotlin) for configuring the build configurations. Also offers wide options for automatical cleanups, reducing the required time for administering the application to almost zero

Aspetti negativi:

Some features, like artifacts path or filters offer their own filter syntax. I think it is pretty difficult to get into this syntax as the documentation could be better. But once your into it, it is very flexible and covers all requirements.

Pravin kumar
Pravin kumar
Software development lead (USA)
Servizi finanziari, 1.001-5.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

One stop tool for CI/CD

5,0 6 anni fa

Commenti: I have used the tool with my two previous employers.. definitely improved the productivity of team.. it was uself with both web and desktop application

Aspetti positivi:

Highly flexibly and configurable.. filled with a ton of functionality.. if you don't find a functionality, you will still have option to configure through custom scripts

Aspetti negativi:

Learning curve can be annoying especially if you don't have support within your team. It takes time to master the tool

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Assicurazioni
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Excellent continuous integration and automated build tool

5,0 7 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

TeamCity plays really well with .NET check-ins and continuous integration. If you've checked in something that breaks a build, or that won't pass the tests that have to be passed before a build commences, TeamCity will definitely let you know. This is a great kit for CI and getting builds out when you've got multiple players involved in updating and maintaining code throughout the day.

Aspetti negativi:

The security options for TeamCity to let people run it from workstations and simulate a build to see what might break -- that can be a little tricky to get going.

Karol
Owner (Polonia)
Software informatici, 2-10 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Good tool for CI/DI

5,0 2 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

Free for small configurations, enough to small teams. Fast and stable. Easy to configure and maintain.

Aspetti negativi:

I guess the only drawback of this tool is that it runs on the JVM and thus requires a fair amount of memory resources.

Abhishek
Portfolio manager (Canada)
Software informatici, 10.000+ dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Best teamcity review

5,0 2 anni fa

Commenti: Overall I am very happy with the tool.

Aspetti positivi:

Dashboard is very easy to understand and logging is user friendly.

Aspetti negativi:

Support team is not that great. Usually they respond in two weeks time which does not help at all.

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Easy to use continuous integration tool

5,0 7 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

Much easier than Jenkins to setup a C# build. Love the ability to do templating on common build scenarios. Nice integration with GitHub for build status on PR's

Aspetti negativi:

I would like to be able to setup Build Pipelines. The integration with Visual Studio and Git is lacking.

Tim
Tim
Systems Engineer (USA)
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

TeamCity is how CI should be done

5,0 7 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

As a former Jenkins user, I find TeamCity to be a much more user-friendly way to do Continuous Integration. There are recipes that cover the spectrum and integration with git/github is very cool. I also like the extensibility and integration vaialble through the various plugins.

Aspetti negativi:

Continuous Integration can be daunting to set up and use - TeamCity handles this pretty well but there is a definite learning curve.

Terence
Software Developer (Nuova Zelanda)
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Developer's Essential Tool

4,0 7 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

Once you get this powerful CI tool up and running, it will save your development massive amount of time. We have been using this for years, all set up to build, run unit tests and deploy to a staging server. Also, JetBrains generously lets you use it for free up to 3 build agents from the get go, so cost is not a concern here.

Aspetti negativi:

The tool can be a bit complex and overwhelming to get started if you are new to the tool. If you overcome this hurdle, it will be worth your while.

Mahipal Singh
Software Engineer (India)
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 1.001-5.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

TeamCity Review

5,0 3 anni fa

Commenti: My overall experience with TeamCity is too good. It reduces the developer's efforts to push the changes in the server.

Aspetti positivi:

The most impactful feature of this software is to help the CI/CD. Team members can easily deploy the changes done in the product application to the server. It supports multiple version controls like git, svn, etc. We can easily integrate different version control to different servers to push the changes in the server. While deploying the changes it will also let the user what all the pending changes he needs to push onto the server. It is easy to use.

Aspetti negativi:

As of now, I don't have anything which I don't like about this software.

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Biotecnologie, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Perfect for Self-Hosted Teams with strong JetBrains tooling preferences

5,0 6 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

Integrates flawlessly with IntelliJ and other JetBrains tools. Quick and easy to verify changes in a CI environment.

Aspetti negativi:

Lack of integration with some 3rd party CI/CD tooling makes integration in larger enterprises challenging.

Chippy
Software Developer (Australia)
Trasporto aereo/Aviazione, 201-500 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Highly recommend this tool

5,0 3 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

Very easy to integrate Very helpful in business integration Great software for building your code

Aspetti negativi:

No cons could be found when building, auditing or deploying this