--- description: Scopri le funzionalità di ReqView, i dettagli del prodotto, chi utilizza il software e quali sono i prodotti suggeriti. Attraverso le recensioni di utenti verificati potrai capire com’è la user experience, l’assistenza post-vendita e molto altro. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ReqView - Prezzi, recensioni, informazioni - Capterra Italia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software per la gestione dei requisiti](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [ReqView](/software/145388/reqview) # ReqView Canonical: https://www.capterra.it/software/145388/reqview Pagina: 1/3\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/145388/reqview?page=2) > Strumento di gestione delle esigenze di software e sistemi per i clienti di settori regolamentati, per conformarsi agli standard di ingegneria dei sistemi. > > Conclusione: valutazione di **4.6/5** stelle assegnate da 49 utenti. Miglior punteggio per il parametro **Lo consiglieresti?**. ----- ## Panoramica ### Chi utilizza ReqView? Gestione delle esigenze di software e sistemi in cui le esigenze contano. ReqView è considerato affidabile dai clienti dei settori regolamentati per ottenere la conformità agli standard critici di sicurezza. ## Statistiche e valutazioni | Parametro | Valutazione | Dettaglio | | **Nel complesso** | **4.6/5** | 49 Recensioni | | Facilità d'uso | 4.4/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Assistenza clienti | 4.9/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Rapporto qualità-prezzo | 4.8/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Funzionalità | 4.1/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Percentuale di raccomandazione | 90% | (9/10 Lo consiglieresti?) | ## Informazioni sul fornitore - **Azienda**: Eccam - **Anno di fondazione**: 2004 ## Contesto commerciale - **Prezzo di partenza**: 430,00 € - **Modello tariffario**: (Versione gratuita disponibile) (Versione di prova gratuita (free trial)) - **Pubblico target**: Lavoratore autonomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementazione e piattaforme**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Windows (locale), Linux (locale) - **Lingue supportate**: inglese - **Paesi disponibili**: Australia, Brasile, Canada, Cechia, Cina, Germania, Giappone, India, Messico, Regno Unito, Stati Uniti ## Funzionalità - Gestione della conformità - Gestione delle modifiche - Prioritizzazione ## Integrazioni (11 in totale) - Apache Subversion - Bitbucket - Enterprise Architect - GitHub - GitLab - IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS - Jira - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Word - Polarion REQUIREMENTS - Windchill ## Opzioni di supporto - Email/Help desk - FAQ/Forum - Knowledge Base - Chat ## Categoria - [Software per la gestione dei requisiti](https://www.capterra.it/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Categorie correlate - [Software per la gestione dei requisiti](https://www.capterra.it/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) - [Software di IT Management](https://www.capterra.it/directory/10001/it-management/software) ## Alternative 1. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.it/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3663 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.it/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15312 reviews) 3. [Aha\!](https://www.capterra.it/software/144020/aha) — 4.7/5 (561 reviews) 4. [reqSuite® rm](https://www.capterra.it/software/162954/reqsuite) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 5. [TraceCloud](https://www.capterra.it/software/135649/tracecloud) — 4.1/5 (67 reviews) ## Recensioni ### "Try ReqView\!" — 5.0/5 > **Benjamin** | *25 agosto 2025* | Design | Tasso di raccomandazione: 10.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Helpful to organize reqs, risks and other stuff. Straightforward setup and customizable. Good options. Great for smaller organizations that can't afford a huge IT overhead and maintenance for more complex products. > > **Inconvenienti**: Minimal free access for other users. Main issue is commenting. Need to be able to have a large number of users have access to leave comments. This would be really helpful. Also - simultaneous access for comments (at least leaving their own, not deleting or responding). Other small issues - slow loading and unlocking, could be easier to copy paste cells into other rows/requirements (especially tracing links). > > It has been good. They are responsive to requests, add features we ask for overtime, and it helps us collaborate. It will only get better I think. I would recommend to any small to medium org that needs a simple tracing/req/risk management systems. Massively better than Excel or other handcrafted systems. ----- ### "Lightweight and Capable Requirements Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Tolgahan** | *7 agosto 2025* | Aeronautica e industria aerospaziale | Tasso di raccomandazione: 10.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: ReqView is very lightweight and fast to use. UI feels modern and fresh and very intuitive. Recently added scaling options make reading on high DPI screens very comfortable. > > **Inconvenienti**: No out-of box solution for traceability link coherence/baselining if the linked documents are split into multiple git repositories. > > We are using ReqView as a replacement to Doors Classic. While it is not (yet) a drop in replacement due to some missing functionality, ReqView was flexible enough to let us integrate it into our workflow. Customer support is stellar, they are very responsive, friendly and do their best to find solutions for reported issues. Dev team also seem very capable solving reported issues in a timely manner. ----- ### "Good value for money with great support but still some work to be done on the tool" — 4.0/5 > **Nazar** | *5 marzo 2026* | Trasporto aereo/Aviazione | Tasso di raccomandazione: 7.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Very fast responses from the support team with actual helpful advices. The software is very custom and anyone can tailor it to their needs instead of trying to fit in into the existing framework. Clear roadmap of features to be introduced, the product is constantly improving. It is a good value for money, though. > > **Inconvenienti**: There are some features for collaboration that are missing, which prevent us from multiple people using the tool at its maximum capacity ----- ### "Review by Albert" — 3.0/5 > **Albert** | *4 novembre 2022* | Costruzione di reti ferroviarie | Tasso di raccomandazione: 7.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: The capability to make traceability between documents and projects in a very efficient way. > > **Inconvenienti**: The most critical of the SW to me is the 'CNTRl+Z' command does not exist. ----- ### "Loaded with features for a very reasonable price" — 5.0/5 > **Alexandre** | *12 dicembre 2024* | Aeronautica e industria aerospaziale | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: The company enhance the product based on user's feedback and needs. The tool is lightweight, no brainer to deploy and maintain. Easy integration with Jira or other tools. The support I received was excellent. Different flexible types of licensing. Affordable. Round trip update from Jira\! Possible to work with distributed teams/tiers (document exchange). > > **Inconvenienti**: Indentation when moving requirements across section could be difficult, but with practice it is easier. > > User since 2020 something. Worked in the past with IBM/Jama/R4J (...) and I have to hard time finding out what ReqView is missing compared to those tools, given my experience is mainly in stringent domains (Aero/military). ----- Pagina: 1/3\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/145388/reqview?page=2) ## Link - [Visualizza su Capterra](https://www.capterra.it/software/145388/reqview) ## Questa pagina è disponibile nelle seguenti lingue | Lingua | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Dati strutturati