Da 17 anni aiutiamo le aziende
a scegliere i migliori software
Informazioni su Bitbucket
Bitbucket offre molto di più della semplice gestione del codice Git, Bitbucket offre ai team una posizione in cui pianificare i progetti, collaborare sul codice, effettuare test e implementare i risultati.
The overall interface of the platform is really awesome and it provides various integrations with JIRA and other tools as it belongs to the same Atlassian community.
I dislike with bit bucket that it is complicated to rollback or delete changes once they are pushed to a repository.
Filtra le recensioni (1.338)
Utilizzo
Ordina per
Filtra le recensioni (1.338)
Sistema di versionamento utile e configurabile
Aspetti positivi:
L'interfaccia è molto intuitiva, sono presenti funzionalità comuni a GitHub e GitLab.
Aspetti negativi:
Non mi da l'impressione di essere ben arricchito di funzionalità come GitHub.
La nostra scelta tra i big del controllo versione e del CI/CD
Commenti: Nel complesso è un ottimo software per la gestione del codice sorgente, le pipeline sono molto comode da mettere in piedi e sono intuitive da costruire.
Aspetti positivi:
La funzionalità base del controllo di versione del software ormai è un pregio che tutti i big si possono permettere. Questo software, mette a disposizione varie interfacce, comode da usare, per il controllo del software, per la gestione di pipeline automatizzate e per la gestione dei repository. Molto comoda l'integrazione con altri software di gestione del codice e di project management
Aspetti negativi:
Il prezzo per i piani a pagamento è veramente alto, per un piccolo team si fa fatica a consigliare l'acquisto di un piano a pagamento
una piattaforma completa per la gestione del codice sorgente
Aspetti positivi:
Come sviluppatore frontend, ho avuto l'opportunità di utilizzare Bitbucket di Atlassian durante la mia prima esperienza lavorativa, e devo dire che mi ha davvero impressionato per la sua completezza e la sua capacità di semplificare il lavoro del team. Una delle cose che mi sono piaciute di Bitbucket è stata la sua integrazione con Jira, che permette di tracciare lo stato delle attività e visualizzare i progressi in tempo reale. Inoltre, ho apprezzato le funzionalità avanzate per il controllo della versione, che mi hanno permesso di lavorare in modo efficiente e di gestire il codice sorgente in modo sicuro e affidabile.
Aspetti negativi:
può rappresentare una sfida per i nuovi utenti o per coloro che non hanno molta esperienza tecnica, ma una volta superata la curva di apprendimento iniziale, può offrire un'esperienza completa per la gestione del codice sorgente.
Un programma che se ben capito diventa utilissimo
Aspetti positivi:
Il software permette di poter condividere con il network lavorativo codici e cartelle file. Nello specifico la mia esperienza con bitbucket è stata abbastanza positiva e utile durante la progettazione e la rializzazione di progetti scientifici basati sulla biologia computazionale
Aspetti negativi:
Ho trovato un po' difficile l'iniziale comprensione della gestione del pull e push dei dati. Le modifiche contemporanee fra più utilizzatori della stessa repository dovrebbero essere gestite meglio
bitbuckket
Aspetti positivi:
intuitivo in fase di generazione nuova procedura
Aspetti negativi:
non intuitivo in fase di generazione nuova procedura se collegata ad altri
Alternative considerate:
An alternative for the Atlassian environment
Commenti: It was very easy to set up. I had the chance to propose this tool to my development team, and it helps and gets to its full potential if you are using other Atlassian tools.
Aspetti positivi:
What I liked the most about using Bitbucket was the possibility of interconnecting everything from JIRA and Confluence directly and seamlessly to my repositories. This helped my team not only to save time but also to keep track of everything happening around our development cycle in a way that felt natural.
Aspetti negativi:
The interface tries to differentiate from GitHub a lot, and sometimes it feels it is not something you need to innovate into; some things are just the way they are. I found the project->repository structure confusing, and navigating through them wasn't easy.
Alternative considerate:
Best source codes versioning control platform for organizations.
Commenti: It is a good product for even small business and jira integration is very smooth,very competitive price in market, there are some improvement required support in down times
Aspetti positivi:
Easy to version source codes. We can ensure maximum protection for our valuable source codes. Can set access permissions for repositories. We can easily review source codes
Aspetti negativi:
When the service is down, it will remain down for more than 1 or 2 hours. Unable to archive repositories.
One of the simplest git hosts
Aspetti positivi:
It is very simple to use, you simply create your repositories and then can push your code to them. It has great security features such as 2 factor authentication. I think you can create unlimited repositories
Aspetti negativi:
The process for reviewing merge requests was more complex than on GitHub.
Fuel for CI/CD
Aspetti positivi:
Easy learning curve, even for someone who is new to DEVOPS concept
Aspetti negativi:
There is a need to make easy configuration of dashboard. One gets hang of it only after using it for a while.
The agile way to go with git
Commenti: It’s nice, I think it is more organized and it works better in an organizational environment, but maybe for personal projects it’s not the best option
Aspetti positivi:
I think it’s great for the integration with Jira, so it’s really useful to integrate in an agile team
Aspetti negativi:
I think the only con that I can see is that there is not so many community out there as in other platforms as github and that they don’t have the dark mode
Alternative considerate:
An application that has all the support and integration with Atlassian
Commenti: I remember that I started with Bitbucket because to start with repositories, it offered me more than the others at zero cost.Then, after starting to work more intensely and manage projects, I opted for the Atlassian suite. I had already been using Trello for a long time and in another company I used Jira for incidents, and I also felt comfortable with these applications, so that I didn't change.
Aspetti positivi:
Probably the integration with the complete Atlassian suite is what attracts me the most, working with Jira, Trello, Confluence and being able to solve problems from a support or customer service common to all these applications, greatly influences the decision to work with Bitbucket.
Aspetti negativi:
Well, there are two clear competitors that take the majority of the repositories, but they are not mutually exclusive, you can use another of them, perhaps better in some aspects, while still taking advantage of the integration with the other applications.
A neat git server
Commenti: I am very satisfied with Bitbucket as a git server that I am using at work for multiple projects. I could share codes with my collaborators and manage our codes in an efficient way.
Aspetti positivi:
A Git-based source code repository hosting service with a friendly user interface and a clear layout
Aspetti negativi:
Hard to find the details of a closed pull request that is not very recent. The recent ones are displayed on dashboard.
Bitbucket is a fantastic tool!
Commenti: I’ve used bitbucket for over 5 years now. It’s a great tool and has really helped me see who is happening with my repos and streamline processes
Aspetti positivi:
It’s a brilliant way to house and visualize your repos, review and comment on pr’s and see your full commit history in one place
Aspetti negativi:
It can be a bit buggy at times which can really hinder being able to work collaboratively
Best Software for Version Control Tool
Commenti: ok overall I have good experience with bitbucket and easily control the code and make pipelines so easy for live server.
Aspetti positivi:
I am using this version control tool last from 2 tears and easily manage code using this. you can work with many peoples for one project.
Aspetti negativi:
code revert process is so complicated if there is any bug in code and you want to do code revert then the process is complex but when you are new with this tool.
Bitbucket Review
Commenti: I've been working with bitbucket for several years and it is a good option for SCM
Aspetti positivi:
Good integration with Atlassian products
Aspetti negativi:
I don't like the graphic interface, this could improve
Top of the tops choice for version control
Commenti: Positive experience, with BitBucket the development processes are more standardized and easy to implement and follow.
Aspetti positivi:
The integration with Jira is one of our favourite BitBucket features. The UI is always clear and allows for full configuration of rules in order to approve the PR. The branching model configuration is also easy and very user friendly.
Aspetti negativi:
When managing more workspaces the UI gives by default the latest viewed workspace, except for the personal workspaces. This could be confusing at first but it's a minor issue an user can get used to.
Efficient Git Repository Management
Aspetti positivi:
It makes managing code repositories easy, like when we merged our latest feature branch with no issues.
Aspetti negativi:
When managing multiple repositories, finding specific settings or options can be a bit of a hassle.
Alternative considerate:
Great source control, with caveats
Commenti: It's a perfectly adequate git host, though after using other offerings in the market, I tend to lean away from Bitbucket
Aspetti positivi:
Easy to set up repos and good enough permission management for users. Easy to organise repos into "directories".
Aspetti negativi:
The Pull request experience isn't great, especially for longer-lived pull requests with a large amount of files. I hear batched comments to PRs were added recently, so that's a step in the right direction.
Bitbucket review
Aspetti positivi:
Bitbucket stands out as a valuable instrument for both code deployment and the project management lifecycle. Its seamless integration with Jira and a suite of Atlassian software not only simplifies collaboration for our team but also empowers us to work cohesively within the sprint framework, greatly enhancing our efficiency.
Aspetti negativi:
Bitbucket may pose limitations for teams seeking more advanced project functionality, and its user interface can occasionally present navigational challenges.
Bitbucket for team using JIRA
Aspetti positivi:
the JIRA integration, linking with the tasks or stories. Failure tacking, risk analysis, continuous integration
Aspetti negativi:
it works great both the web and desktop instances
Could be better
Aspetti positivi:
It helps to save the code to the repository. The amazing feature it has it it could be integrated with project management tools such as Jira, Also one could create a issue in BItbucket and link it with jira which saves a lot of time and helps to track the status of the ongoing project.
Aspetti negativi:
The user interface could be better since it is very hard to navigate. It does not show what changes the developer made while creating a pull request.
Great for teams
Aspetti positivi:
Bitbucket is super easy to use and great for teams needing to house their code in the cloud. Everyone on the team can link their IDE to Bitbucket and pull or update code in seconds. Makes collaboration a breeze and you can also branch code.
Aspetti negativi:
Setup can be a bit involved at first but once all the prices are in place it’s smooth sailing. Worth the setup it will save you time and easy for software dev teams.
Great and free for a small team, pretty good and cheap for a bigger
Commenti: Pretty good with the basic stuff, integration with Jira is a plus
Aspetti positivi:
Free for a small team. Easy to use, easy for code review
Aspetti negativi:
Pipeline performance could be better. Didn't spend a lot of time with it though
Bitbucket review
Aspetti positivi:
I used Bitbucked as a version control system. This was used with ArgoCD for continuous deployment. The environment is so easy to use and commiting changes was seemless
Aspetti negativi:
Nothing on this for now. Maybe I'll have some after I explore other capabilities of the application
Managing code has never been easier
Aspetti positivi:
Remote hosting, nice and sleek U.I, simple collaborative functions such as permissions and a history tab to compare between branches
Aspetti negativi:
Limited integrations, and the pricing if you're looking into a repository for a project.
