Recensioni su GitLab

Versione demo incompleta ma ben funzionane

Commenti: Buona esperienza tutto sommato positiva.

Aspetti positivi:

Sa fare bene quel per cui e' progettato.

Aspetti negativi:

Alcune funzionalita' sono migliorabili e ho speranza nei prossimi aggiornamenti

Controlla il tuo codice sorgente

Commenti: Lavoro con GitLab da diverso tempo e trovo ancora difficoltà nell'utlilizzarlo da linea di codice, trovo molto comoda invece l'integrazione diretta in Visual Studio, anche se alcune impostazioni sono a volte difficili da trovare

Aspetti positivi:

Molto comoda l'integrazione con Visual Studio

Aspetti negativi:

Macchinoso lavorare in GitLab attraverso i comandi su linea di codice

Come potrebbe fare un programatore senza..???

Commenti: Mi sono trovato in un gruppo di lavoro, ho dovuto per forza usarlo...era l'unico modo sicuro per controllare il codice

Aspetti positivi:

Per ogni programmmatore è importante la gestione e la distribuzione del codice sorgente, se si collabora con altri è praticamente impossibile non usarlo

Aspetti negativi:

Non è sicuramente immediato, ci ho messo un po' all'inizio prima di abituarmi all'utilizzo

Gestione del codice a 360 gradi

Aspetti positivi:

GitLab offre una suite completa di strumenti, inclusi repository Git, integrazione continua, monitoraggio degli errori e altro ancora

Aspetti negativi:

Per utenti meno esperti, l’ampia gamma di funzionalità di GitLab potrebbe comportare maggiori difficoltà

Utile

Commenti: Molto utile a livello aziendale

Aspetti positivi:

Interessante strumenti web per coordinare la stessa base di codice, possibilità di commenti e feedback

Aspetti negativi:

Non essendo tecnico, a volte ho delle difficoltà a utilizzarlo.

Ottimo strumenti per la gestione del codice

Aspetti positivi:

Mi è piaciuto il supporto per la creazione e gestione di branch e merge (anche direttamente sulla UI e senza l’utilizzo di comandi git).Stesso dicasi per la gestione delle attività e delle assegnazioni di tasks per sviluppatore presente nel team.Interfaccia abbastanza user-friendly.

Aspetti negativi:

L’interfaccia è si user-friendly ma per chi si accinge ad usare il software le prime volte potrebbe trovare difficoltà nel muoversi tra le varie funzionalità presenti.

Il must have per la gestione di repository GIT

Aspetti positivi:

Uso Gitlab da molti anni ormai ed é notelvolmente migliorato.Nei pro facilità di utilizzo.Buon sistema di review del codice.

Aspetti negativi:

Quando viene eseguita una merge request ogni tanto rimane "appesa" e bisogna refreshare la pagina.

Provato di recente la versione trial

Aspetti positivi:

Non ho ancora avuto modo di approfondire tutte le funzionalità ma mi sembra uno strumento molto completo, permette la gestione di tutto il ciclo di vita del software ed offre una piattaforma abbastanza completa. Possibilità di deployare su kubernates.

Aspetti negativi:

Forse non molto intuitiva, per ora non ho trovato altri aspetti negativi.

Buona piattaforma per la gestione del codice

Aspetti positivi:

Gitlab ha un'interfaccia utente abbastanza facile da capire, è molto utile per gestire i progetti che condivido con i miei colleghi. Offre una buona capacità di archiviazione e una documentazione semplice per le persone alle prime armi.

Aspetti negativi:

Sono ancora agli inizi con questo sistema di revisionamento, quindi per adesso non ho trovato enormi difetti

Gitlab Review

Commenti: I really like using Gitlab CI. We are building and deploying our applications using Gitlab CI mostly every day. It's very stable and fast. So that m overall experience is very good with Gitlab CI.

Aspetti positivi:

The working style of most of the CI/CD tools are similar in the background. The ones that has better UI and fast responses are making a difference in the market. Gitlab CI, by far has the best UI. The button clicks, flows and placement of the features are very well-designed.

Aspetti negativi:

I cannot say least but I would be happier if Gitlab adds more UI features in CI/CD level.

Perfect product but perhaps too expensive

Commenti: My overall experience with GitLab is fine, there were no issues per se except with the pricing but this should not affect your choice to use such a great service and product.

Aspetti positivi:

I enjoyed the encrpytion and protection of our code with GitLab the most, and how it is already compatible with our GitHub branches and repositories.

Aspetti negativi:

The pricing of GitLab and being per user were huge turn-offs for us as a business but understandably considering the nature of the product.

GitLab is my go-to for project management, code storage, and collaboration. It's a game changer.

Aspetti positivi:

The built-in CI/CD, issue tracking, and merge request features make my development process seamless and efficient.

Aspetti negativi:

The user interface can be overwhelming at first, and the learning curve is a bit steep for beginners.

Best repository to be used for managing code

Aspetti positivi:

It’s good for managing the development assets in IT. Easier to understand the conflicts for new starters also.

Aspetti negativi:

It’s good to have a user interface to understand any conflicts, issues etc., while using

The best open source devops suite and code manager

Commenti: Overall very satisfied! They are on par and often above GitHub.

Aspetti positivi:

It's open source, they are improving a lot and there are a ton of features for everyone.

Aspetti negativi:

sometimes the UX is just behind GitHub. Some performance improvement could be great alghough it may depends on our own server.

Gitlab Is the Best For Innovation and Development!

Commenti: We have been able to customize Gitlab exclusively to our needs and has helped us grow way faster than we would of using other applications.

Aspetti positivi:

The customization is unbelievable and there are constant new updates for new features.

Aspetti negativi:

It can have a large learning curve to get up to speed on how to use.

GitLab - The all in one DevOps Solution.

Commenti: Gitlab has been a game-changer for our development process, providing a reliable and scalable solution for code management, automation, and deployment. I highly recommend it for any team looking for an end-to-end DevOps platform.

Aspetti positivi:

Gitlab's all in one nature stands out as its most unique feature. Instead of reelying on various other applications we can use gitlab for the purpose of version control, CI/CD, Issue Tracking, Code Reviews, Security, Container Registry, Monitoring and Analytics.

Aspetti negativi:

Nothing as of now but it feels a quite complicated due to the wide range of features but once you get the hang of it , the tools are incredibly effective.

Review for Git Lab

Commenti: My overall experience with GL was easy and i had no struggle ever using it in the context of university or even teaching my self.

Aspetti positivi:

Its a easy way for partly VC and displaying information in the context of teaching

Aspetti negativi:

i did not dislike anything about gitlab, there are surely things that can be upgraded but there is no real bad part.

Managing CI/CD

Commenti: Getting help in devops feature like CI pipeline is a good part. Efficient code reviews and solving problems are easy.

Aspetti positivi:

1. This product is absolutely helpful to handle code-related issues, and errors and being a part of discussions to work on matters easily. 2. Running and managing CI/CD is super easy. 3. A very user-friendly environment and easy customization options are available.

Aspetti negativi:

1. Little bit complex to start without any prior experience. 2. UI is complex and can be improved.

GitLab integration at a project

Aspetti positivi:

Easy to integrate with development SDLC in the project

Aspetti negativi:

So far, so good. A good addition is an available extensive documentation

A good product if you stay within its limits

Commenti: I would not choose Gitlab over Github if I have a choice because the CI system on Github is better and so many people know how to use Github that it's just a better place for open source software I believe. If I am working on closed-source software and Gitlab has already been selected then I wouldn't object, it'll get the job done well.

Aspetti positivi:

I like Gitlab in most ways. It has great task management that integrates well with code changes. As a Git server, it does everything you need. It's relatively easy to administrate. If you stick with the well-supported features then Gitlab will serve you well.

Aspetti negativi:

The technology is showing its age and can be frustrating to use. Integrating custom runners can be shockingly painful. I have run into UI bugs that allow tasks to be run before their dependencies are met which has caused serious release problems. Designing pipelines without a system like Github actions is incredibly fiddly and error prone.

GitLab: Next gen Collaboration Tool

Commenti: Overall it is a 8.7 out of 10 experience, considering the average to be 5. It is better than some of the platforms in many terms, but till lagging some level of scalebility.

Aspetti positivi:

It offers an all-in-one platform that includes version control, issue tracking, continuous integration, and more. It excels at managing Git repositories, allowing for easy branching, merging, and version control. It has robust access control features, allowing administrators to manage user roles, permissions, and project visibility.

Aspetti negativi:

It is resource-intensive, especially for larger projects or organizations. It is hard to initially learn the tools and technologies. The UI/UX is less tempting.

The UI is easy for beginners to understand, and pipeline management is convenient.

Commenti: When undertaking any development project, people generally think of GitLab and GitHub for code management and CI/CD tools. However, considerations regarding UI and the speed of catching up are often overlooked. I would like to share my thoughts on these aspects.

Aspetti positivi:

Having used both GitHub and GitLab, I found that GitLab stands out with its beginner-friendly UI and easy-to-use pipeline management. The reason is that I prioritize how quickly someone can catch up when joining a new project and using a tool. In this aspect, I highly recommend GitLab.

Aspetti negativi:

While this doesn't affect enterprise plans, the free plan has some limitations. Additionally, unlike other software, it lacks substantial community support.

CI is outstanding in Gitlab

Aspetti positivi:

I am fan of Gitlab CI, it's highly robust and highly reliable.

Aspetti negativi:

No public repository options like Github

GitLab is a great tool to version your code

Aspetti positivi:

The GitLab CI feature made deployments a lot quicker and simpler.

Aspetti negativi:

It didn't integrate natively with AWS's CodePipeline service a couple of years ago.

Great way for git-based source code management on the premises

Commenti: I'd say maybe 5+ years ago, this was probably the only real alternative to GitHub that you can host on your own server. This was important for certain projects that had strict privacy restrictions. At that time, occasionally updates may break some parts of the GitHub service causing some down time and requiring a bit IT-debugging efforts. These days this doesn't happen so much. Overall, pretty satisfied.

Aspetti positivi:

Highly customizable and gives a pretty close experience to GitHub but with ability to host the service on your own server.

Aspetti negativi:

Not a lot to dislike except when some updates break things causing down times on your own repositories. This was a few years ago though, it's much better nowadays.