Informazioni su Shortcut

Clubhouse è una piattaforma di gestione dei progetti veloce, creata per i team del software odierni. Provalo gratis per 14 giorni. Non è richiesta alcuna carta di credito.

Ulteriori informazioni su Shortcut

Aspetti positivi:

Ve used more complex software for ticket management and simpler tools, and Shortcut is the right balance of features, cost and ease of use.

Aspetti negativi:

Some technical bugs that come about (and no way to avoid upgrading versions) because it's a web app. Mobile app could also use some work.

Valutazioni di Shortcut

Punteggio medio

Facilità d'uso
4,4
Servizio clienti
4,6
Caratteristiche
4,4
Rapporto qualità-prezzo
4,6

Lo consiglieresti?

8,4/10

Shortcut ha una valutazione complessiva di 4,6 stelle su 5, calcolata sulla base di 347 recensioni degli utenti di Capterra.

Hai già usato Shortcut?

Condividi la tua esperienza con altri acquirenti.

Filtra le recensioni (347)

Bryan
Bryan
Product Director (USA)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Design, 2-10 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

The perfect tool for software projects using Kanban

5,0 3 anni fa

Commenti: Clubhouse helps us manage agile software projects better than ever before. With other tools it feels like we are forcing it to try to accommodate our workflow, but with Clubhouse it feels like it was designed exactly for our use.

Aspetti positivi:

Clubhouse brought us a new set of features and ways to organize stories and tasks that we didn't know we wanted/needed. We have always stuck with tools that were able to help improve our kanban based workflow rather than the simple project board tools like Trello that cater to everyone more than software/product development specifically. There are few tools out there that provide what we are looking for: the ability to organize and label stories with more granularity than a single label (estimates, types, project, priorities, epic, etc), and the ability to have reports like velocity and burndown charts.

Aspetti negativi:

It is a very small thing, but it would be nice if we could adjust the color scheme of both things like labels beyond the default options, as well as adjust the overall interface colors.

Cindy
Product Manager (Australia)
Servizi finanziari, 2-10 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Simple to use and provides enough features to run and manage sprints for a small team

4,0 2 settimane fa Nuova

Aspetti positivi:

- Simple to learn and navigate so the team could quickly start using the product after switching- Love the dark mode and the colour coding of different story types i.e bug, feature or chore so it's easy to see things at the high level- Easy to create sprints and I like the summaries provided on the story points

Aspetti negativi:

- You can only write stories in markdown text. Not a big issue since I've become really good at it! But it'd be good if there was a text editor instead- Sometimes when I create a story and I accidentally click out of it, I lose the progress. It'd be good if they had a draft functionality where the stories get created as a draft straight away

Alternative considerate: Jira

Perché scegliere Shortcut: We needed something that was more focused on sprint management

Software precedente: Notion

Perché passare a Shortcut: JIRA has a quite suite of features however it was too complex for what we were looking for. We need something to track our sprints and features and shortcut was perfect for that.

Kirsty
Teacher Support Specialist (USA)
E-learning, 201-500 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 1-5 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Short may be an overstatement for shortcut

3,0 anno scorso

Aspetti positivi:

This is an adequate task management/tracking software. It has a fantastic Zendesk integration and multiple customizable fields. It also boasts decent search and filtering functions but it isn't particularly user-friendly and filling out all the fields that make it function well takes a great deal of time (hence the title of this review).

Aspetti negativi:

There are no AI/smart suggestions for related epic/team fields so every time you make a new ticket you have to search through them by scratch. They also don't offer a great tag database or tag definitions so you have to create naming conventions separately offline. You also can't use rich text in story descriptions.

Cristian
CEO (USA)
Software informatici, 2-10 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Exactly what we need

5,0 2 settimane fa Nuova

Commenti: It is the best tool for our business given our current size. I would recommend it for small teams of designers and engineers. Its integration with GitHub and similar tools is best in class.

Aspetti positivi:

Its interface is super fast compared to tools like Jira. I find the platform extremely easy to use and configure.

Aspetti negativi:

The interface has changed recently and at times that can be jarring. But I have no major complaints.

Alternative considerate: Wrike e Asana

Perché scegliere Shortcut: Jira was too expensive and sluggish for us.

Software precedente: Jira

Perché passare a Shortcut: Its simplicity

Wanja
Product owner (Germania)
Servizi finanziari, 201-500 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Impressive

5,0 2 settimane fa Nuova

Aspetti positivi:

From usability and technical perspective this is really an amazing piece of software. The easiness to never having to save something is extremely impressive

Aspetti negativi:

Moving stories between different Workflows is sometimes a bit annoying. Also it would be really awesome if you could apply your own prioritsation scheme and rank for it.

Arturo
Ceo (Spagna)
Software informatici, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Best project management tool, period

5,0 2 settimane fa Nuova

Aspetti positivi:

Fast. Easy to onboard. Easy to use.Clear

Aspetti negativi:

I like everything, even that one day their team called us to hear us out

Thomas
CPO (Germania)
Software informatici, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Ease and Joy of use

5,0 2 settimane fa Nuova

Commenti: All the team loves it - especially compared to jira

Aspetti positivi:

Joy of use, low barrier to add/modify things

Aspetti negativi:

Priorization of tasks and epics could be easier

Russ
Senior Engineer (USA)
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Shortcut is a powerful tool

5,0 2 settimane fa Nuova

Aspetti positivi:

There are plenty of features that are user friendly, but you are not locked into using all of them. You can use only what you need and keep things simple. Also, searching and filtering is very robust.

Aspetti negativi:

Removing a workflow after it has associated stories and other references is not straightforward and requires jumping back and forth between screens.

Nick
Software Developer (Canada)
Software informatici, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

A great product with great features!

4,0 2 settimane fa Nuova

Aspetti positivi:

Shortcut checks all the boxes! It makes collaboration and product management a breeze for our team.

Aspetti negativi:

The interface is so powerful that it can take a little time getting used to it.

Utente Verificato
Data analyst (Francia)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Contabilità, 1.001-5.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 1-5 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Online project management app

5,0 2 settimane fa Nuova

Commenti: It's a cool and simple to use solution. I am sitll testing it.

Aspetti positivi:

Shortcut is an online project management solution that stand for business owner from planning to the full project developpment.

Aspetti negativi:

there is nothing bad for this solution. you just need to learn how to use it

Alternative considerate: Zenkit

Software precedente: Zenkit

Lee-ann
Director of Business Systems (USA)
Marketing e pubblicità, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Shortcut (previously Clubhouse) has been a great improvement for us.

5,0 anno scorso

Commenti: Overall our experience has been great. Less has been falling through the cracks, and we're able to actively manage & prioritize our development with ease. The application is enjoyed by both the development team & the management team, so everyone is benefitting from our switch to Shortcut.

Aspetti positivi:

1. The app is very easy to configure & set up. 2. The user experience is seamless & functionality is very self-explanatory. 3. There are multiple ways to configure each component, so you can set up the app according to what works best for you & your company. (No "one size fits all" model.) 4. The ability to set up different workflows for different departments has been a huge help for us.

Aspetti negativi:

1. It's a little hard to envision how each of the components should be set up for your organization when you're first getting in there (i.e., projects, workflows, milestones, epics, stories), so we ended up changing the setup as we went along after the initial configuration. This wasn't necessarily a bad thing, as it allowed us to improve the way we currently did things. 2. The biggest issue we have now, after using the app for a while, is that stories do not populate into the Gantt charts, only epics. This means if we have one-off tasks that are added as stories, those do not pull into the report we'd like. For that reason, we have to set up an entire epic just to set up a single story, for reporting purposes. I think it would be great if you had the option to pull the Gantt reports at the epic or story-level.

Freddie
Product Manager (USA)
Servizi finanziari, 2-10 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Shortcut is a great tool for small companies!

4,0 anno scorso

Aspetti positivi:

Many of the features of this software are useful to our company. Our team has come to heavily rely on the roadmap view and reporting tools. These features have kept our company on track and increased our velocity in immeasurable ways.

Aspetti negativi:

A few of the features our team feels are missing from Shortcut are custom fields and release management. If our team was able to have a reliable release management system, it would be very impactful to our team and customers.

Alternative considerate: Jira

Perché scegliere Shortcut: This software simplified the product management pipeline and offered the best toolsets for our light touch pipeline.

Software precedente: Jira e monday.com

Josh
Engineering Director (USA)
Software informatici, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Took of our Trade

5,0 anno scorso

Commenti: One spot for all teams to work together for client success is always going to be a win for a team.

Aspetti positivi:

Shortcut does a great job allowing us to manage all facets of our product and being multiple teams together for what is most important, client and end user satisfaction. It follows standard agile flow but allows flexibility where engineers and non-engineers can use it alike. We also utilize their API for templates epics and stories and it is great to work with. Support team and client success managers have been a pleasure to work with when we’ve had conversations. They always are able to handle a situation or get us in touch with someone who can. Lastly the product is always evolving and they are very transparent through their website and slack channel of what is coming next to make your life better!

Aspetti negativi:

Some things were less flexible such as naming conventions and required fields on stories/epics, but these are getting worked out over time (for ex projects are not required any more)

Alternative considerate: Jira, Basecamp e ClickUp

Perché scegliere Shortcut: Wanted one tool with more power and better price.

Software precedente: Trello e monday.com

Perché passare a Shortcut: Most flexible and best bang for your buck.

Justin
Co-Founder & CXO (USA)
Telecomunicazioni, 201-500 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Scaled for the complexity of JIRA, but with the best UX possible & no sysadmins needed

5,0 anno scorso

Aspetti positivi:

Every org grows out of Github Issues, Trello, and Asana when they realize a) stories need relationships such as blocking/blocked; b) stories need task checklists; c) different groups have different workflows; d) stories are often mini-project briefs and need to read as such. However, once you find yourself in JIRA, which you've been told is the mature platform for mature orgs, you're operating a nuclear submarine, you need 3 sysadmins, nobody can find anything, and you want to throw your computer out the window. SC has the infrastructure but with the user-friendliness of everyday software. Think of how Mixpanel took what Omniture was doing and made it accessible to the everyday marketer. That's what Shortcut does for eng/prod teams. No sysadmin needed, everyone gets it. Their API is well-documented and incredible. We do tons with Zapier because of how much they expose. Their CS team is spectacular, inquisitive, friendly, helpful. They want their customers to succeed. They have a one-click signup link which has made our onboarding process much faster They have templated stories and checklists which we use across the org for everything from product launches through onboarding/offboarding hires.

Aspetti negativi:

very few dislikes. it's amazing. if i have to force criticism: - If you work cross-departmentally, avoid multiple workflows, or you'll be having to look at multiple kanban boards daily - the "dashboard" (home) isn't as useful as it seems like it should be so we all either use iterations or stories view for our daily lens - shortcut and productboard both boast integration, but it's not great, and i think this is the fault of productboard but really these criticisms represent like 5% negative compared to 95% enthusiastic positive

Alternative considerate: Swimlane, Jira, monday.com e Asana

Perché scegliere Shortcut: A friend told me that Clubhouse was effectively "JIRA but with a designer cofounder" and that's accurate.

Software precedente: Trello

Thomas
Developer (USA)
Settore automobilistico, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Shortcut (formerly Clubhouse) is a great task management tool for development teams

5,0 anno scorso

Aspetti positivi:

Before switching to Shortcut, we used Jira. While Jira has plenty of features, we found it a bit cumbersome and the performance of the interface was atrocious (everything single task was incredibly slow, even the most basic activities had a noticeable delay). The first major benefit we saw with Shortcut was the speed of interaction - instead of waiting for the interface to catch up, we could just log in and get things done. The integrations with various source control platforms (we use the Gitlab integration) also helps keep task statuses up to date without even having to open the web interface. Overall the speed of the interface and the available integrations lead to a feeling that Shortcut never "gets in our way".

Aspetti negativi:

We started out paying for Shortcut (when it was still called Clubhouse), but were soon switched to a free plan without even having to ask. Although this was a nice gesture on their part, they then released a beta of their new product called Write. This beta is only available for paying users, which is understandable, but having been moved to a free plan meant we couldn't access it. This isn't a major issue, but starting our subscription back up would require going through the approval process with our accounting department again so we've just stayed on the free plan without access to Write so far.

De Ville
CTO (Canada)
Software informatici, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Clubhouse is all the software project management you need without the clutter and noise

5,0 3 anni fa

Commenti: Clubhouse has been a game-changer for us since we migrated from JIRA. We looked for something that was more lightweight, but still afforded us all the features we need to track our software projects. This is exactly what Clubhouse delivered, and more. I love the fact that Clubhouse gives you everything you need to track a project from the granularity of a sub-task, all the way up to milestones. This makes it easy to distinguish the forest from the trees, and present the relevant story to stakeholders at different levels. We haven't regretted the move to Clubhouse for a single moment, and we're always delighted with the new features that are regularly released. Simply put, Clubhouse gets out of your way very quickly and lets you get on with your actual goal: creating great software.

Aspetti positivi:

- Clean user interface - Fast search - Continuously adding of new, useful features - Great integrations - Free for teams of up to 10 users

Aspetti negativi:

- This is mostly me nitpicking, but I'd say reporting. It has been improving over time though. - It would also be great if there was a tool for simplifying backlog grooming

Alternative considerate: ZenHub e Sprintly

Perché scegliere Shortcut: JIRA felt feels like an oil tanker, where most companies we need a tugboat, i.e. lean, powerful and agile. JIRA also gives you infinite customizability options, which often leads to over-complication and analysis paralysis.

Software precedente: Jira

Perché passare a Shortcut: The other tools we evaluated were either too simple for our needs (lack of features) or lacked in usability. We often underplay the importance of the joy of using a certain software product. I continually found that I had to beg people to keep other tools updated with the current state of affairs, wherewith Clubhouse they simply opted to do it themselves. The other options just didn't compare to Clubhouse.

Sean
CTO (Canada)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Software informatici, 2-10 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Clubhouse vs Jira? Clubhouse wins.

5,0 4 anni fa

Commenti: I have previously used Fogbugz, Jira, Trello, and a few others, and Clubhouse is the clear winner. You will find some of what I mention here applicable to something like Jira; contains depth, customer service request and issue tracking are highly visible, can be simple to use. But it would be like saying a burger from McDonald's is the same as the burger from Raoul's in NY; they both have buns, a meat patty, and you can create depth with the condiments! You could say that, but you'd be a fool. Are you a large org with cash to burn, needing extreme amounts of control, and customization, with mandated workflows? Jira has your answer. Are you a small/medium team that needs a fantastic feature & project tracking tool that works great out of the box? Clubhouse is hands down the best.

Aspetti positivi:

I find the product to be very simple at the surface with deep capabilities. Previously, we were using Jira and I found the software to be overkill for many of the tasks that we perform. Additionally, so much of Jira's useful functionality (and the Atlassian suite as a whole) is hidden behind paywalls, 3rd party addon services, and little gouges along the way. I absolutely abhor that practice so finding Clubhouse was a godsend. Customer service has been prompt and helpful, and though they have not implemented my feature request, I at least know that it has been prioritized. Team collaboration is great with their Slack integration. My team posts bugs, hotfixes, feature requests in the proper project, and I am automatically notified via Slack. The whole team has visibility to their request's progress.

Aspetti negativi:

Navigating the nomenclature of Stories, Epics, Projects, Milestones, and how they should fit together is a bit taxing at first and takes getting used to. It would be helpful to have visual guides for someone like myself, but the documentation is available and well written. This is where I discovered the depth of capabilities in Clubhouse. You can very simply manage your project with Stories, and you can very finely tune your progress and visibility by getting to know these different groupings.

Ashok
Chief Product Officer (Germania)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Marketing e pubblicità, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Perfect Balance Between Simplicity and Power

5,0 4 anni fa

Commenti: Clubhouse has given us a great workflow which minimises the reliance on human input while maximising the oversight we have on the work we have in progress. For our team it strikes the perfect balance between the simplicity of Trello with the best bits of more powerful tools like Jira - minus all of the bloat. I would highly recommend it for the sake that because it's developer focused, our developers actually don't mind using it. At the end of the day, your tool is only going to be as good as the effort your team is willing to put into using it so this is definitely something that isn't to be overlooked.

Aspetti positivi:

Unlike other agile management platforms, Clubhouse is setup that you can get a lot of value from the simple Kanban board with the option to go deeper and track more in depth insights into the progress of your work. We moved to Clubhouse from a setup of Trello with a ton of extensions to help manage the extra tracking we wanted to be doing, and I think the best analogy I can make is that Clubhouse is like Trello on steroids. But in saying that, it's far simpler and more effective than other bloated tracking software like Jira or Pivotal Tracker - which in my opinion try to please the managers who want a lot of fancy yet ultimately meaningless metrics at the expense of user experience for the development team who ultimately has to spend time keeping it up to date. The GitHub integration which automatically moves cards as they progress through pull requests is a great example of how Clubhouse has considered that the development team is ultimately the user of the platform, and should be designed around getting them to use it effectively rather than bloating it for the sake of what management think looks good.

Aspetti negativi:

There isn't anything major that I would complain about, but there are some improvements like showing epic burn down charts by points instead of the number of stories that I've asked for a few times but haven't been implemented. The reporting functionality also has a few bugs, but nothing major that stops it from being valuable.

Shu-Wai
Shu-Wai
Director of Engineering (USA)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 2-10 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Developer-friendly and hits the Sweet Spot for Features

5,0 10 mesi fa

Aspetti positivi:

Shortcut is "just right" for our needs, and thinking back about previous companies, would have been perfect in their needs, too. It is much more than a to-do tracker but doesn't overwhelm you with flexibility. My favorite part of this software is that it's story-centric. Epics are available, but they can play a supporting role if needed. Tasks are left to the developer to fill out themselves end up being merely a checklist. This paradigm shifts the focus to deliverables and prevents gamification by closing out menial tasks just to pump up ticket closures. As a bonus, this standardizes the language of Epics/Stories/Tasks. There is no more endless debate on what should be what. The one thing I've always seen with Jira, especially in young teams, is that the flexibility of the product creates unproductive debate and confusion about terminology.

Aspetti negativi:

This product focuses on product delivery. For more general applications, like issue tracking or process management, it may not be the best for that.

Emma
Product Manager / Data Analyst (USA)
Internet, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

I've used Shortcut for everything for 3+ years

5,0 anno scorso

Commenti: I use Shortcut to do everything in my job. I use it to write stories that engineers use to manage all of their work. My colleagues also submit requests, bugs, feature ideas, questions, etc. through Shortcut. Those turn into things for me to do, stories that get assigned to engineers, or just stories that the Product team uses to keep track of requests and help inform our roadmap + strategy.

Aspetti positivi:

I manage engineering workflow as well as my own as an individual contributor in Shortcut. I also keep track of ideas and requests for when I set out to build new products. I love using labels in Shortcuts for managing my own workflow - requests that come from different teams get different labels so members of that team can see everything I'm working on for them and reliably know what state projects are in. I try to keep as much communication in Shortcut stories as opposed to emails because being able to reference it in Shortcut is very valuable to me. The search functionality is really good and unless I've named something really weirdly I can always find what I'm looking for.

Aspetti negativi:

I haven't gotten familiar with using notifications in Shortcut and I rely on email notifications. This isn't to say that Shortcut doesn't have the right capabilities for notifications (commenting on stories is what I want notifications about), but just that I haven't really explored/figured it out which says something itself.

Rachel
Head of Engineering & Technology (USA)
Intrattenimento, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Great Solution

5,0 anno scorso

Aspetti positivi:

The software is so easy to use and was really easy to set up. Almost every integration you could need is also available to make workflow quicker and more automated.

Aspetti negativi:

Switching from Projects to Teams has been quite difficult and required that we rework our custom board and views used for our normal agile ceremonies.

Alternative considerate: Trello e Asana

Perché scegliere Shortcut: Jira was too expensive and everyone hated it.

Software precedente: JIRA Service Management

Perché passare a Shortcut: More flexible and cheaper

Brendon
Director of Technology (USA)
Vendita al dettaglio, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Small Business Software WIN

5,0 anno scorso

Commenti: The Shortcut software and formerly Clubhouse, has been exceptional! When I have use MS, Linear, and others, They don’t make as happy and relaxed and fulfilled as Shortcut does.

Aspetti positivi:

The ability to use Shortcut the first day, integrate with our process easily and nicely, search items successfully every time, link items, all without a hiccup!

Aspetti negativi:

I wish more people in our organization could use it!!!! Just doesn’t fit their processes at the moment… I am working on it though!

Alternative considerate: Microsoft Visual Studio, Jira, Microsoft Project e LinearB

Perché scegliere Shortcut: Cost, ease of use, simplicity and yet the depth of the product was exceptional!

Software precedente: Microsoft Visual Studio, Jira, Microsoft Project e LinearB

Perché passare a Shortcut: Shortcut hits all of the notes for us! It’s simple and yet offers so many features!

John
VP of Engineering (USA)
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Solid Product with Curated Agile Experience

4,0 anno scorso

Commenti: A solid 8.5/10. Would recommend to others, would use again and keep using, but could stand to improve a few features that would bring it up to a 10.

Aspetti positivi:

This software is a curated experience that intentionally limits setup and flows compared with other products like JIRA which are less "bounded." I think this is better for most teams which do not care to install extra plugins and fight with non-intuitive workflow items.

Aspetti negativi:

There are some quirks in group selection and application, filtering, and sorting that do not always let me cross-cut the data the ways I want.

Alternative considerate: Jira, Trello e GitLab

Perché passare a Shortcut: Was here when I got here and curated experience. May shift to Gitlab eventually since we do our code there and features set is similar (even if it does not look as nice) to save on the monthly cost. The price point is completely fair, but just an extra expense not worth it for a few features missing as we migrate.

Veronica
Senior Project Manager (USA)
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Clubhouse is the Goldie Locks Level of JUST RIGHT!

5,0 4 anni fa

Commenti: When I started at this company they had no real process and no project management. They were using a collection of about 70 Trello boards to categorize and track work, but there was no roll up view of everything and the sheer flexibility of Trello was too much to manage. I have worked in JIRA and similar platforms before, they are cumbersome to set up and require that you utilize their entire eco-system for more rich-features. Clubhouse is the perfect middle ground. It helps us organize our 6 teams and their workloads, prioritize work among the many company priorities and work with the owners to come up with roadmaps for the future... ALL IN THE SAME TOOL! As we are able to build in our branching and deployment process into Clubhouse, it will be even better for us. We are truly working toward standardizing our work items, planning and estimating and could not have done that without Clubhouse.

Aspetti positivi:

I like the ease of use, from day one of setting up Clubhouse it just made sense and was easy to configure for our purposes. It was easy to jump in and start using without much learning curve for all of the team members as well. We love how much work we can have in a single work space and with powerful filtering, searching, everyone gets their perfect view for their purpose!

Aspetti negativi:

I wish there were more canned reporting features for Kanban workflows, but honestly it's not the end of the world since we have access to the REST API for building our own custom reports! Right now our private Gitlab integration isn't working but what is amazing is that Clubhouse support and engineering is working through it with us. I love that about Clubhouse. (Can you tell it's hard for me to find something negative about the software???)

Marco
Project Manager (Brasile)
Amministrazione pubblica, 1.001-5.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

My review

5,0 settimana scorsa Nuova

Commenti: =)

Aspetti positivi:

The software is incredible, it's easy to use, and the features just feats your team needs.

Aspetti negativi:

For Brazil it is a really expensive product, I wouldn't be able to pay the complete version, although I know that the free plan locks features that would be really helpful. Some international companies vary the price based on the exchange rate. That would allow to sell your product here easily. For example, for a team of 7 the price would be $84,00, that makes almost R$500,00 here that is almost the same as all the shopping (food, grocery..) for a family of two for a month. See?Other than that, it would be awesome to be able to change the team shortcut url. When I've created my team account I didn't know that the company name would be used for the URL, now it is very long and very ugly to share.