--- description: Scopri le funzionalità di BrowserStack, i dettagli del prodotto, chi utilizza il software e quali sono i prodotti suggeriti. Attraverso le recensioni di utenti verificati potrai capire com’è la user experience, l’assistenza post-vendita e molto altro. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: BrowserStack - Prezzi, recensioni, informazioni - Capterra Italia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software per test automatici](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/162900/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.capterra.it/software/162900/browserstack Pagina: 1/32\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) > Piattaforma di test cross-browser per sviluppatori che consente di testare applicazioni e siti web mobili. > > Conclusione: valutazione di **4.6/5** stelle assegnate da 764 utenti. Miglior punteggio per il parametro **Lo consiglieresti?**. ----- ## Panoramica ### Chi utilizza BrowserStack? In breve: Chiunque progetta e sviluppa per l'Open web. Non è necessario conoscere linguaggi di programmazione per utilizzare strumenti di test interattivi tra browser. ## Statistiche e valutazioni | Parametro | Valutazione | Dettaglio | | **Nel complesso** | **4.6/5** | 764 Recensioni | | Facilità d'uso | 4.6/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Assistenza clienti | 4.4/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Rapporto qualità-prezzo | 4.2/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Funzionalità | 4.5/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Percentuale di raccomandazione | 90% | (9/10 Lo consiglieresti?) | ## Informazioni sul fornitore - **Azienda**: BrowserStack - **Anno di fondazione**: 2011 ## Contesto commerciale - **Prezzo di partenza**: 39,00 USD - **Modello tariffario**: (Versione gratuita disponibile) (Versione di prova gratuita (free trial)) - **Pubblico target**: Lavoratore autonomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementazione e piattaforme**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop) - **Lingue supportate**: inglese - **Paesi disponibili**: Australia, Brasile, Canada, Danimarca, Emirati Arabi Uniti, Germania, India, Irlanda, Isole Vergini Americane, Isole Vergini Britanniche, Israele, Messico, Regno Unito, Singapore, Stati Uniti, Sudafrica ## Funzionalità - Annotazioni - Archiviazione e conservazione - Automated Testing - Avvisi/Notifiche - Collaudo web - Controllo accessi/Autorizzazioni - Controllo della versione - Creazione di report/analisi - Garanzia di qualità - Gestione degli audit - Gestione dei progetti - Gestione dei requisiti - Gestione dei test - Gestione del flusso di lavoro - Gestione del repository - Gestione del rischio - Gestione del testing dei software - Gestione delle prestazioni - Gestione di documenti - Gestione di incidenti - Identificazione delle strozzature - Integrazione continua - Metriche quantitative - Monitoraggio - Monitoraggio della conformità - Monitoraggio della rete - Monitoraggio delle attività - Multiple Test Types - Parametri prestazionali - Prove tramite cellulare - Revisione di script di test - Rilevamento dei difetti - Rilevamento di anomalie - Rilevamento di problemi - Scenari di carico - Script di prova - Segmentazione del pubblico di riferimento - Sondaggi e feedback - Strumenti collaborativi - Supporto per l'esecuzione in parallelo - Test del carico - Testing delle performance - Tracciabilità - Tracciato di controllo - Trascrizioni/Registrazioni video - Vista gerarchica - Visualizzazione di dati ## Integrazioni (16 in totale) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... e altre 1 integrazioni ## Opzioni di supporto - Email/Help desk - FAQ/Forum - Knowledge Base - Assistenza telefonica - Chat ## Categoria - [Software per test automatici](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Categorie correlate - [Software per test automatici](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Software per bug tracking](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [Software per User Testing](https://www.capterra.it/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Software per test di carico](https://www.capterra.it/directory/32135/load-testing/software) - [Software per la gestione dei test](https://www.capterra.it/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Alternative 1. [Tricentis qTest](https://www.capterra.it/software/173762/qtest) — 4.4/5 (27 reviews) 2. [Lyssna](https://www.capterra.it/software/178766/usabilityhub) — 4.6/5 (86 reviews) 3. [TestRail](https://www.capterra.it/software/128204/testrail) — 4.3/5 (177 reviews) 4. [Userbrain](https://www.capterra.it/software/141082/userbrain) — 4.2/5 (88 reviews) 5. [Testsigma](https://www.capterra.it/software/171626/testsigma) — 4.3/5 (19 reviews) ## Recensioni ### "Essential testing tool" — 5.0/5 > **David** | *2 aprile 2026* | Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione | Tasso di raccomandazione: 9.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Testing on real devices instead of emulators. Makes a huge difference for catching actual browser quirks and mobile issues. Easy to use and good value for money. > > **Inconvenienti**: Nothing significant. Pricing could be lower for solo developers who use it occasionally like me, but if you're a frontend dev using it daily, the value is unbeatable. ----- ### "Reliable Cross Browser Testing Tool - Browserstack" — 5.0/5 > **Yash** | *2 aprile 2026* | Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: - I can test on alomst any real iphone or android model without needing the physical hardwhere. - It makes it very easy to test my local dev env even when i'm behind a company's VPN. - It works well with our existing Playwright and Pyhton automation scripts. > > **Inconvenienti**: - There's often a big lag between my mouse click \& the remote devide responding. - It can take 20 30 sec, just to start a session, which feels slow when you are in a hurry. - It's definitely on the expensive side, especially when you start adding parallel testing slots for the team. > > It's a good tool that has become a part of our workflow. It helps us catch CSS bugs and layout issues on mobile Safari that we just can't see on desktop emulators. While the speed could be better and the cost is high, the reliability of testing on real devices makes it worth it for a professional team. ----- ### "Simplifying Testing with Real Devices and Seamless Automation" — 4.0/5 > **Abin** | *24 marzo 2026* | Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: What I like most about BrowserStack is how easily it brings everything together in one place. I can quickly access a wide range of real devices and browsers for live testing, which makes debugging much faster and more reliable without needing to manage physical devices(using Live and App Live), while also avoiding the overhead of maintaining an in-house device lab. At the same time, the platform fits well into our automation workflow with Automate and App Automate, allowing us to run tests in parallel and integrate with CI/CD without much effort. It also helps keep things organized with its test management capabilities, so tracking and maintaining test cases becomes easier. Overall, it has made the entire testing process smoother and more efficient, and whenever I’ve needed help, the support team has been responsive and useful. > > **Inconvenienti**: One area where BrowserStack could improve is performance consistency at times, especially when using certain devices where sessions can feel slightly slow or laggy depending on network conditions. Also, while the platform offers a lot of features, it can take some time to fully explore and get comfortable with everything, especially for new users. Occasionally, debugging automation failures can require extra effort due to limited visibility compared to local environments. That said, these are relatively minor compared to the overall benefits the platform provides. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It makes both manual and automated testing easier by providing quick access to real devices and browsers, without the need for managing infrastructure. It fits well into daily workflows, from quick debugging to running automated tests, and has helped improve testing speed and efficiency. While there are occasional minor performance lags, it remains a reliable and valuable tool for the QA process. ----- ### "Okay, but not the best for Test Management" — 3.0/5 > **Jess** | *2 aprile 2026* | Software informatici | Tasso di raccomandazione: 6.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: They have the right idea with Test Management but the execution is a little iffy. For example the drag and drop for copying a test case will work for a bit, then stop. Their support team is top tier. > > **Inconvenienti**: The bugs, the execution of Test Management is a little iffy. For example the drag and drop for copying a test case will work for a bit, then stop. > > Overall its neutral. We ended up switching to Qase for better/cheaper AI test case creation. BrowserStacks support team has been great through the various issues but we did run into a lot of issues. ----- ### "The Unfair Advantage Every QA/Automation Team Deserves" — 5.0/5 > **Yogesh** | *2 aprile 2026* | Prodotti chimici | Tasso di raccomandazione: 10.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Five years on the enterprise plan and the one thing I like most is how BrowserStack completely removes infrastructure as a problem. Real devices with SIM support, thousands of browser and OS combinations, instant availability, no maintenance overhead. App Live and App Automate work seamlessly with Selenium, Appium, Playwright and most of automation tools without any complex setup. Parallel execution is significantly faster than any self hosted grid I have managed. The newly released no code low code testing is also best, accessibility testing and visual regression tools are production ready and not just checkboxes. For an enterprise team this is the best investment in the testing stack. > > **Inconvenienti**: Pricing is the one honest gripe. BrowserStack is worth every rupee but it is not cheap, and for smaller teams or startups the enterprise plan can feel like a stretch. Parallel session limits on lower tiers push you to upgrade faster than expected and when your team scales quickly, the cost scales with it in a way that requires a conversation with finance every renewal cycle. > > BrowserStack did not just improve our testing workflow, It transformed how our entire engineering culture thinks about quality. The chaos before was real. Flaky emulators, inconsistent local device setups, test results that meant nothing because the environment was never stable. Onboarding a new automation tool meant weeks of configuration, compatibility debugging and infrastructure work before a single meaningful test ran. From day one on the BS plan the difference was visible. Real devices, real browsers, real network conditions, available instantly, every single time. No queues, no "device is offline," no environment drift. The confidence in our test results changed overnight because the platform underneath them was finally reliable. Across multiple automation tools integration experience has been consistently smooth. Switching frameworks mid project did not mean rebuilding infrastructure, It meant updating a config and moving on. That kind of flexibility is rare and genuinely underappreciated until you have worked without it. App Live became the go to for exploratory testing on real devices with SIM support. App Automate handled mobile regression at a scale and speed a physical device lab three times our budget could not have matched. The freedom to choose between virtual and real devices depending on the test objective gave us precision we simply did not have before. The no code and low code capabilities brought manual QA members directly into the automation process, accessibility testing and visual regression are now standard pipeline stages, not separate afterthought tools. Everything lives in one platform, reporting is unified and session management gives complete visibility into what ran, when and exactly why something failed. Enterprise support has been a genuine partner throughout, Issues resolved by people who actually understand automation deeply, not generic ticket handlers. There is a reason it remains the one tool in the stack that has never been up for replacement. It is not just a platform, it is the foundation our entire quality process is built on. ----- Pagina: 1/32\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) ## Link - [Visualizza su Capterra](https://www.capterra.it/software/162900/browserstack) ## Questa pagina è disponibile nelle seguenti lingue | Lingua | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Dati strutturati