--- description: Scopri le funzionalità di Juro, i dettagli del prodotto, chi utilizza il software e quali sono i prodotti suggeriti. Attraverso le recensioni di utenti verificati potrai capire com’è la user experience, l’assistenza post-vendita e molto altro. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Juro - Prezzi, recensioni, informazioni - Capterra Italia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software per la gestione dei contratti](/directory/30078/contract-management/software) > [Juro](/software/167130/juro) # Juro Canonical: https://www.capterra.it/software/167130/juro Pagina: 1/3\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/167130/juro?page=2) > Soluzione di gestione dei contratti abilitata per l'IA, progettata per il business moderno. > > Conclusione: valutazione di **4.8/5** stelle assegnate da 41 utenti. Miglior punteggio per il parametro **Lo consiglieresti?**. ----- ## Panoramica ### Chi utilizza Juro? Reparti vendite, risorse umane, reparti operativi e team legali. Molti clienti sono aziende in fase di crescita e imprese di grandi dimensioni. ## Statistiche e valutazioni | Parametro | Valutazione | Dettaglio | | **Nel complesso** | **4.8/5** | 41 Recensioni | | Facilità d'uso | 4.8/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Assistenza clienti | 4.9/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Rapporto qualità-prezzo | 4.5/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Funzionalità | 4.5/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Percentuale di raccomandazione | 90% | (9/10 Lo consiglieresti?) | ## Informazioni sul fornitore - **Azienda**: Juro - **Area geografica**: London, UK - **Anno di fondazione**: 2016 ## Contesto commerciale - **Pubblico target**: 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementazione e piattaforme**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Lingue supportate**: ceco, danese, finlandese, francese, inglese, irlandese, italiano, norvegese, olandese, polacco, portoghese, russo, spagnolo, svedese, tedesco, ucraino, ungherese - **Paesi disponibili**: Albania, Andorra, Anguilla, Antigua e Barbuda, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Barbados, Belgio, Belize, Bermuda, Bielorussia, Bosnia ed Erzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Cechia, Cipro, Città del Vaticano, Costa Rica e altri 95 ## Funzionalità - Acquisizione di documenti - Archiviazione di documenti - Collaborazione in team - Condivisione di documenti - Controllo accessi/Autorizzazioni - Controllo del processo di valutazione - Controllo della versione - Firma elettronica - Gestione del flusso di lavoro - Modelli personalizzabili - Modelli precompilati - Monitoraggio della conformità - Ricerca del testo completo - Ricerca/Filtro - Strumenti collaborativi - Third-Party Integrations ## Integrazioni (11 in totale) - Google Drive - Greenhouse - HubSpot CRM - Okta - Salesforce Platform - Salesforce Sales Cloud - Slack - Workday Financial Management - Workday HCM - Workday Talent Management - Zapier ## Opzioni di supporto - Email/Help desk - FAQ/Forum - Knowledge Base - Assistenza diretta 24 ore su 24 - Chat ## Categoria - [Software per la gestione dei contratti](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30078/contract-management/software) ## Categorie correlate - [Software per la gestione dei contratti](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30078/contract-management/software) - [Software di gestione documentale](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30063/document-management/software) ## Alternative 1. [Docusign](https://www.capterra.it/software/121506/docusign) — 4.7/5 (9267 reviews) 2. [Deel](https://www.capterra.it/software/205015/deel) — 4.8/5 (4265 reviews) 3. [Adobe Acrobat](https://www.capterra.it/software/1012240/adobe-acrobat-dc) — 4.7/5 (4169 reviews) 4. [Webdox](https://www.capterra.it/software/197944/webdox) — 4.7/5 (147 reviews) 5. [PandaDoc](https://www.capterra.it/software/131735/pandadoc) — 4.5/5 (1243 reviews) ## Recensioni ### "Great cutting-edge contract management software" — 5.0/5 > **Sharief** | *24 ottobre 2018* | Proprietà immobiliari | Tasso di raccomandazione: 10.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Juro makes creating and managing customer contracts at scale an absolute breeze. We can get a customised contract out to a customer in seconds rather than 30+ minutes now, are able to chat with customers and answer their questions within the contract itself, and get instantly informed via Slack when it's been signed. > > **Inconvenienti**: There are two primary areas of improvement: - The first is the ability to track changes - we create new versions of contracts on a constant basis, so being able to redline, see what changes have been made, and store those versions in a logical way would be hugely helpful - The second related point is the version control - the filing system for contract templates is rudimentary (i.e. there is one folder for all templates) and would be improved if it was possible to add subfolders However, the benefits for us far outweigh the above as we have workarounds > > Juro makes the life for our legal and sales teams significantly easier. We've cut down the time taken to create a contract by 96% and also made tracking of signatures much more visible. ----- ### "Great contract tool" — 4.0/5 > **Utente Verificato** | *8 agosto 2025* | Ospedali e sistemi sanitari | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Juro makes contract creation and management feel intuitive and collaborative. In particular the contract based editor is great - it’s much easier to use than clunky Word-based workflows. I liked how easy it was to standardise contracts, collect approvals, and keep everything in one place without having to constantly jump between tools. It really helped reduce legal bottlenecks and gave our ops team better visibility and control. > > **Inconvenienti**: Personally, the pricing was a challenge for us, especially as a growing company with evolving priorities. While the features are solid, it became difficult to justify the cost when we were reassessing our tech stack. Some of the reporting felt a bit limited too - we would’ve liked more flexible analytics around contract statuses etc. > > Overall, Juro was a great solution for simplifying and speeding up our contract workflows. It’s well-designed, user-friendly, and clearly built with operations and legal teams in mind. We still use it for some planning templates, which speaks to how useful the platform is – but ultimately, we had to step away from it due to budget constraints. If pricing aligns with your stage and needs, it’s a very strong option. ----- ### "Great contract tool" — 4.0/5 > **Zach** | *3 aprile 2026* | Servizi finanziari | Tasso di raccomandazione: 7.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Juro streamlines contract creation and approvals, giving users clear visibility over contract status, terms, and sign‑off. Standardised templates and structured workflows reduce errors, speed up execution, and improve control over commercial agreements without heavy legal involvement. > > **Inconvenienti**: Nothing comes to mind so far; the platform has met our needs without causing issues or friction. etc ----- ### "Something good but major flaw" — 3.0/5 > **Terho** | *12 aprile 2024* | Software informatici | Tasso di raccomandazione: 2.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Pretty easy to use and contract negotiation part functions well. > > **Inconvenienti**: It has major flaws concerning signing procedure. Attachments are not legally part of the contract since they are not merged as attachments to actual signed contract. And you can change attachments after signing. This has caused major issues with the customers. ----- ### "Allows me to avoid converting contract drafts into a jumbled email chain" — 5.0/5 > **Brion** | *26 gennaio 2026* | Software informatici | Tasso di raccomandazione: 9.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Mainly, I use Juro for drafting and reviewing contract versions, sending those versions as well as having them signed in a single application rather than constantly jumping back and forth between MS Word documents and emails. On an everyday basis I am working on Juro making small tweaks to contract language, requesting comments from team members via tags and sending the final versions of contracts for signature in a single application. What I like about Juro is I can clearly see which part of the process has stalled rather than having to guess who still needs to look at it. > > **Inconvenienti**: Editing more complex contracts can sometimes be somewhat restrictive, particularly if I need to do some extremely detailed formatting of that contract. Also, I had to spend more time than I anticipated cleaning up, editing and moving all of our current templates into the new system. Although some of the functionality in Juro was incredibly powerful, it was not always immediately apparent until I had spent enough time using the product. > > Juro significantly reduces the amount of "back and forth" and version confusion that occurred previously with contracts being created and managed through emails and shared drive systems. That results in reduced delays, as well as significantly less mental overhead (or stress) when managing many different contracts simultaneously. ----- Pagina: 1/3\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/167130/juro?page=2) ## Link - [Visualizza su Capterra](https://www.capterra.it/software/167130/juro) ## Questa pagina è disponibile nelle seguenti lingue | Lingua | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Dati strutturati