Da 17 anni aiutiamo le aziende
a scegliere i migliori software

Informazioni su Copyleaks

Piattaforma di rilevamento del plagio con intelligenza artificiale e machine learning.

Ulteriori informazioni su Copyleaks

Aspetti positivi:

It is easy to use and fast, the prices goes according to the quality.

Aspetti negativi:

The least is how it's functions when trying to connect with new people within the group its sometimes difficult.

Valutazioni di Copyleaks

Punteggio medio

Facilità d'uso
4,6
Servizio clienti
4,5
Caratteristiche
4,3
Rapporto qualità-prezzo
4,2

Lo consiglieresti?

8,0/ 10

Copyleaks ha una valutazione complessiva di 4,4 stelle su 5, calcolata sulla base di 91 recensioni degli utenti di Capterra.

Hai già usato Copyleaks?

Condividi la tua esperienza con altri acquirenti.

Filtra le recensioni (91)

Felipe Louro
Felipe Louro
Senior Operations Manager (Portogallo)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Servizi bancari, 5.001-10.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Prova gratuita
Fonte della recensione

Easy to use

5,0 5 anni fa

Commenti: Could validate my thesis and not to fear any plagiarism.

Aspetti positivi:

Easy to use. Friendly with a fresh good look.

Aspetti negativi:

It’s not free for a long period and you need to pay.

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Affari internazionali, 2-10 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Copyleaks user review

4,0 5 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

Copyleaks is really useful when writing essays. It checks if you did anything wrong regarding quotations. It is really easy to use as well.

Aspetti negativi:

You need "points" in order to have your essays reviewed. Sometimes it can be frustrating, especially if one is a free user and needs to use referrals to earn more points.

Mzubanzi
Student (Sudafrica)
E-learning, 1.001-5.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 1-5 mesi
Fonte della recensione
Fonte: SoftwareAdvice

False flagging

3,0 2 anni fa

Commenti: Copyleaks is demoralizing because it always gives a high similarity score for peripheral issues not related to the body of the paper.

Aspetti positivi:

It responds quickly and is easy to use for similarity checking.

Aspetti negativi:

It does not have an exclusion function for Title Page, Table of Contents and Bibliography. Hence it does not only focus on the content of a paper like Turnitin. It gives a false impression that a student has plagiarized.

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Amministrazione pubblica, 1.001-5.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

The most helpful tool for Plagiarism checking

5,0 5 anni fa

Commenti: Everything is good big thanks to copyleaks team for the wonderful job.

Aspetti positivi:

Ease of use, More Faster and One click collecting data's.

Aspetti negativi:

I think if you can add quick shortcut while selecting texts and directly check the plagiarism will be good.

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Scrittura e attività redazionali, Lavoratore autonomo
Ha utilizzato il software per: Prova gratuita
Fonte della recensione

This is a great tool for writers who publish online!

5,0 5 anni fa

Commenti: I'd recommend having this tool in your arsenal if you publish any type of written content. This is a cool monitoring tool. I'm glad I found it.

Aspetti positivi:

This is a great tool for writers who publish online! It was so easy to use. As a writer, sometimes I need to double-check where my content is online. And I sometimes need to track where a client has published work that did for them for analytics purposes. This software was easy to use and only costs 10 bucks a month!

Aspetti negativi:

Right now, I'm not seeing any drawbacks with this software. That may or may not change as I begin to use it more.

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Biotecnologie, 5.001-10.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Prova gratuita
Fonte della recensione

PhD thesis

5,0 5 anni fa

Commenti: Academic writing

Aspetti positivi:

High performance ,accurate results, and fast

Aspetti negativi:

Great functionality ,the results are amazing

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Marketing e pubblicità, 2-10 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Easy to use to have original content

5,0 5 anni fa

Commenti: In building and updating content on our websites this is wonderful.

Aspetti positivi:

With all of the window covering websites, it is easy to use this to help distinguish our content from the competition.

Aspetti negativi:

nothing, it worked really well for our needs.

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Gestione formativa, 201-500 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Prova gratuita
Fonte della recensione

Great way to check

5,0 5 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

I do a lot of writing and using this is make sure I am not committing plagiarism is a major plus.

Aspetti negativi:

No cons for me. Everything works as designed with no issues on my end.

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Automazione industriale, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 1-5 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Review

4,0 5 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

So, the software it is not complicated to use and provides extensive analysis on the text. Apart from aforementioned advantages, this software is considerably robust.

Aspetti negativi:

The cost of the product is kind of high.

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Gestione formativa, 5.001-10.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Prova gratuita
Fonte della recensione

Copyleaks does what it mean

4,0 5 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

Speed to generate report and accuracy of items founds.

Aspetti negativi:

More deep searching for plagiarism on internet

Joseph
Student (USA)
Servizi ai consumatori, 1.001-5.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Prova gratuita
Fonte della recensione

A great time saving product! Plag checks very quickly.

5,0 5 anni fa

Commenti: This is way faster than the setup I had before. I used to have to turn papers in to the school English tutor, who does reviews for the whole school. They are usually swamped around the end of a session with everybody trying to have their final papers checked. It could take days or weeks to get it back, making it difficult to meet deadlines. With Copyleaks I can submit a work and have a complete and accurate review for plag in minutes.

Aspetti positivi:

It's accuracy, ease of use, and suggestions for correction. I used to have to submit articles online to the school English tutor for review, which took days or weeks to return.

Aspetti negativi:

That it pointed out my mistakes. Hahahaha I often copy/paste information from research articles directly into my papers for easy access to refer to them while writing. Many a time I have used direct quotes without citing or forgot to delete the information from my work when done.

Emmanuel
Student (Belgio)
Istruzione primaria/secondaria, Lavoratore autonomo
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

I strongly recommend this program

5,0 5 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

- Easy to use - 10 free credits every months - Reliable

Aspetti negativi:

I don't see any real disadvantage about this software

Seth
Asst professor (USA)
Gestione formativa, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Copy leaks review

4,0 5 anni fa

Commenti: Checking for students plagiarism from the internet or each other

Aspetti positivi:

The ability to drop and drag papers to compare the papers with online articles

Aspetti negativi:

I could not compare students papers against each other for plagiarism

Muhammad
Android Developer (Pakistan)
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

An Honest Review

5,0 5 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

This a really good and easy-to-use product. It really helped me a lot during documentations especially my Final Year Thesis of BS (Computer Science).

Aspetti negativi:

They should improve the quality of the spinner. Once I paraphrased a sentence and it changes the word "single" with "bachelor". So, I think there is room for improvement in this regard.

Sung-En
Student (USA)
Gestione formativa, 501-1.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 1-5 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Hard to cancel

4,0 4 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

It's great and useful. I can easily find a similar part.

Aspetti negativi:

1. It's hard to cancel, even they provided the video, but the webpage in the video is different from mine. I have to send the email several times to figure out how to cancel. 2. Even though I already canceled the subscription, but I still being charged without any notification. So far I still don't know how to stop it, which is horrible.

Freddy
Student (UK)
Ingegneria meccanica o industriale, Lavoratore autonomo
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Review

5,0 6 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

Ease of use and how good the results were

Aspetti negativi:

In my opinion I think it is quite costly especially for students like me

Risposta di Copyleaks

5 anni fa

Hello Freddy, Thank you for leaving a review about Copyleaks on Capterra! We are so happy that you are enjoying using our product. We would love to feature your review on our main website, copyleaks.com. However, we would need a slightly more elaborate write-up (a paragraph or so). If you think you could spare some time and would be willing to write that, please let us know, and we'll send you some information about the details of how it could be written. We are looking forward to hearing from you. Team, Copyleaks

Vipul
Software engineer (USA)
Software informatici, 1.001-5.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Best plagiarism checker

5,0 5 anni fa

Commenti: Positive experience overall. Very happy with the product.

Aspetti positivi:

Easy to use. Clean interface. Gives accurate results.

Aspetti negativi:

Software does not work properly on my phone.

Robert
Social worker (USA)
Gestione di organizzazioni non profit, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

I dig it

4,0 5 anni fa

Commenti: I have used it to check plagiarism in masters levels papers for my MSW

Aspetti positivi:

It is reliable and dependable. I recommend it for others to use

Aspetti negativi:

It is limited in its search scope. I don’t have 100% certainty in its results.

Vishwanath
Professor (India)
Produzione di apparecchi elettrici/elettronici, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Copyleaks Review

3,0 5 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

Easy to use and User friendly. The software will benifit others

Aspetti negativi:

There is nothing I liked the least about the software

stacy
RN (USA)
Ospedali e sistemi sanitari, 1.001-5.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Prova gratuita
Fonte della recensione

Excellent product!

5,0 5 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

Easy to use and worked perfectly! I went back to school after twenty years of nursing and this was extremely helpful! Even for projects at my workplace!

Aspetti negativi:

Alot of competition, many that claim to be free or work better.

Caleb
Auditor (UK)
Contabilità, 10.000+ dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 1-5 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Good value for money

4,0 5 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

Software is very easy to use for someone who isn’t the most tech savvy as myself, very friendly UI.

Aspetti negativi:

Not sure if it was just my situation, but initial installation took quite long

Kelly
personal (USA)
Scrittura e attività redazionali, Lavoratore autonomo
Ha utilizzato il software per: 1-5 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Copyleaks

3,0 6 anni fa

Commenti: average - easy to use but inconsistent results

Aspetti positivi:

Very easy to use and helpful information citing sources.

Aspetti negativi:

Mixed results with same paper. Sometimes missed certain phrases and picked up the next time.

Keith
Student (USA)
Servizi legali, Lavoratore autonomo
Ha utilizzato il software per: 1-5 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Lifesaver

5,0 6 anni fa

Commenti: Loved it. I received better grades after using Copyleaks.

Aspetti positivi:

It is excellent in reviewing documents for plagiarism.

Aspetti negativi:

Takes a long time to review a document and indicate the results.

Mohammed
Graduate student (USA)
Produzione di apparecchi elettrici/elettronici, 10.000+ dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 1-5 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Awesome app for graduate students

5,0 5 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

The ease of use and the depth it offers for New users

Aspetti negativi:

Nothing I hate about this product looks great!

David
Volunteer (USA)
Gestione di organizzazioni non profit, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 1-5 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Great for comparing texts

5,0 5 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

Online version was easy to use and intuitive

Aspetti negativi:

The scoring system is not easy to understand