Recensioni su Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite

Excellent software

Aspetti positivi:

Can exchange data with other research teams, even those working on projects at different trial sites.Provides the ability for electronic signatures, making it simpler to get informed approval from study participants and record it.

Aspetti negativi:

Time consuming when transferring large data set from the application

How I use ResearchManager

Commenti: I started using the research management to imput some patients information, it let me work remotely with other centers.

Aspetti positivi:

How easy is to imput the information, it really helps me to look and review what other researchers in my project upload.

Aspetti negativi:

The company I work with in the USA gave me the oportunity to use it and since the project started I haven't had any issue

Using research manager for getting committee approval

Aspetti positivi:

Support quickly replied and forwarded me to the correct person to solve my problem.

Aspetti negativi:

International researchers need to work with the research manager for getting committee approvals, since it only supports the dutch language the work with the research manger is very complicated. Also the open field, which need to be filled during the submit-process are badly explained. The process is not streamlined and although the Amsterdam UMC policy is to let outsiders file submits on their own, the fields do not support submission with non-Amsterdam UMC mail addresses.

Proces and Document Management System

Commenti: It does what it's meant for

Aspetti positivi:

Organizes an essential process of protocol routing

Aspetti negativi:

Not all buttons are totally intiutive. It requires some training and experience.

New user

Aspetti positivi:

it's easy to use, in my experience access the data and put the data on the document is very easy, everyone could adapt to his own necessities

Aspetti negativi:

some data must be calculated in an easy way

Makes setting up a study easier

Aspetti positivi:

At my University, we have been using this software for the past few months to set up a research project and it is a significant improvement than we had before. It is easy to use and it makes the process faster than before.

Aspetti negativi:

I did not notice any downsides yet, I have been using it only as of recently.

Miskolc review

Aspetti positivi:

That fact that I can see how the data was filled in for a previously involved patient.

Aspetti negativi:

That I do not have a written Data Entry guideline.

Overall Good

Commenti: Good Experience with lot of learning

Aspetti positivi:

Designing and data entry is faster than other edc

Aspetti negativi:

Have some issue with the site adding in the serial number.

metc Isala

Commenti: The best bennefit is the cloud based all in one system for submitting and reviewing any type of study .
The system is easily accessible and supports all parties in the assessment of a study. In addition, the system has an archif function where all documents are saved. The approved and the rejected. The minutes and questions from the committee members remain transparent to all parties at all times. If a printout has to be made for overviews of studies or study components, this system is supporting this. You can sort on every detail of/in the application. This saves the secretariat and its staff a lot of time.It is easy to make overviews on request for investigators or for the competent authority when in need.

Aspetti positivi:

it is easy for investigators to upload their study. They can follow the progress of the descission making process.... The METC has all the docs/letters/review questions/and meeting information in 1 application. The members of the METC have easy acces to the application and they can add their review from any laptop/computer or phone from anywher in the world as long as there is internet.

Aspetti negativi:

It some times can be a bit slow , that can be frustrating!

review research manager

Commenti: we use it for data collection for scientific studies

Aspetti positivi:

- easy in use - many possibilities - good option to use one database with multiple accounts, even from different companies or hospitals

Aspetti negativi:

i have no cons about the software, we use it a lot

Arts-onderzoeker Chirurgie

Aspetti positivi:

Prettig programma om mee te werken. Het heeft alle functionaliteit die je nodig hebt voor het uitvoeren en registreren van een klinische trial. Het heeft even tijd nodig om goed opgezet te worden, maar deze tijd win je 10x terug tijdens het uitvoeren van je onderzoek omdat het systeem vervolgens werkt. Snelheid is erg prettig waardoor weinig tot eigenlijk geen frustraties bij het gebruik.

Aspetti negativi:

Niet echt een minpunt, maar eerder ook aangehaald. Het duurt even voordat je de dataset heb opgebouwd. Maar de gebruiksvriendelijkheid maakt het erg makkelijk. In vergelijking met andere datamanagment programmas werkt het juist erg prettig.

Fijn en betrouwbaar programma

Aspetti positivi:

Ik gebruik Research Manager voornamelijk als ERMS (Ethical Review Management System).Het zorgt voor dat het een overzichtelijk geheel waarin duidelijk te zien is wat de METC nodig heeft en welke documenten er zijn goedgekeurd voor gebruik. Communicatie met de betrokkenen zonder tussenpersoon is ook super. Elektronisch goedkeuren is ook heel handig.

Aspetti negativi:

Op dit moment weet ik niet wat ik nog verbeterd zou willen zien, maar ik gebruik het dan ook nog niet zo lang.

Voor- en nadelen

Commenti: -

Aspetti positivi:

CTMS: het zelf kunnen inrichten van de processen en kunnen wijzigen.

Aspetti negativi:

De ondersteuning zou uitgebreider mogen. In de beginfase is niet duidelijk geworden wat er vast ligt (rollen en daarbij horende beperkingen/mogelijkheden). Daar lopen we later tegen aan.

Proefschrift kinderchirurgie

Aspetti positivi:

Goed toegankelijk, gebruiksvriendelijk, bij vragen/problemen goed te bereiken.

Aspetti negativi:

Wennen tov eerder systemen, oude gewoontes loslaten

PhD onderzoek

Commenti: Inzichtelijk voor het team en overige partijen.

Aspetti positivi:

Inzichtelijk systeem voor indiening en beoordeling van METC voor onderzoek.

Aspetti negativi:

Veel stappen voor het zetten van vinkjes voor de supervisoren. Dit kan efficienter. Graag een appart tabblad voor tussentijdse updates van studies met een duidelijke tijdlijn

Research Manager als trial management software

Aspetti positivi:

Duidelijke statussen van verschillende stappen in het proces

Aspetti negativi:

Geen grote nadelen vanwege de intuitieve software

Na gebruik tijdens klinische trial

Aspetti positivi:

Gebruiksgemak en klant ondersteuning, Mate waarin we uitleg kregen bij nieuwe gebruikers

Aspetti negativi:

nu geen, enige wat ik kan bedenken is dat de prijs hoger is dan gemiddeld maar verder heb ik mij hier te weinig in verdiept

Mostly great

Commenti: I am mostly pleased

Aspetti positivi:

It's mostly very easy to use. I have never had any seriously negative experiences with the software.

Aspetti negativi:

Sometimes not always the most intuitive.

User friendly

Commenti: I used it for my research were participants filled out a very long questionnaire. It was easily converted to SPSS in just a few seconds. It's a real time-saver!

Aspetti positivi:

It's a very user friendly program once you get to know it.

Aspetti negativi:

Sometimes you can't 'code' things beforehand, luckily you can change it very easily in SPSS so it wasn't a problem

Top program

Aspetti positivi:

Easy to use program that maken it the best for me

Aspetti negativi:

Nothing, I really like the program and use it often

Easy to use

Aspetti positivi:

Easy and understandable. Great to be able to export the data to SPSS

Aspetti negativi:

No option to select multiple participants to mark as 'missing'. Would save time!

Find my way

Aspetti positivi:

Everything is on one place, so centralised.

Aspetti negativi:

I had to find my way, ask a few times and now i know its easier

evaluation

Commenti: good

Aspetti positivi:

user friendly good oversight of all items

Aspetti negativi:

lot of clicking not easy loading of documents

Research Manager

Commenti: Overall experience is good, sending documents to the EC is easier now.

Aspetti positivi:

It is easier to submit an protocol to the EC

Aspetti negativi:

Give every document a letter + number is very annoying..

Just a great software!

Commenti: Very handy to keep an overview, easy to use. Always can look back at you documents.

Aspetti positivi:

Very easy to use. Great lay out, so you can find your documents etc. easily.

Aspetti negativi:

Nothing I didn't like or would improve.