Da 15 anni aiutiamo le aziende italiane
a scegliere i migliori software

Recensioni su Autodesk Construction Cloud

Informazioni su Autodesk Construction Cloud

BIM 360 è lo strumento perfetto per direttori di progetto, esterni e BIM per accelerare la consegna, risparmiare denaro e ridurre i rischi.

Ulteriori informazioni su Autodesk Construction Cloud

Aspetti positivi:

It is easy to go in and do construction takeoffs when needing dimensions or areas for pricing as we are a GC.

Aspetti negativi:

The BIM 360 Document Management is very confusing to work in that I avoid it at all costs as much as possible.

Valutazioni di Autodesk Construction Cloud

Punteggio medio

Facilità d'uso
4,2
Servizio clienti
4,2
Caratteristiche
4,1
Rapporto qualità-prezzo
4,0

Lo consiglieresti?

8,4/10

Autodesk Construction Cloud ha una valutazione complessiva di 4,3 stelle su 5, calcolata sulla base di 2.166 recensioni degli utenti di Capterra.

Hai già usato Autodesk Construction Cloud?

Condividi la tua esperienza con altri acquirenti.

Filtra le recensioni (2.166)

Kanaka Pratheek Rao
Kanaka Pratheek Rao
Construction manager
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Industria edilizia, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

User friendly

4,0 3 anni fa
Sottotitoli in italiano disponibili nel lettore video
Filippo
Responsabile amministrativo (Italia)
Import & Export, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Alternative considerate:

Autodesk innovazione e tecnologia

5,0 7 mesi fa

Commenti: Esperienza decisamente molto buona. Usando il software ho imparato molte cose nuove. Sicuramente l’aspetto più importante è la visualizzazione in 3D di ogni progetto, in modo da analizzare e correggere qualsiasi tipo di errore in fase di progettazione. Ottimo consigliato!

Aspetti positivi:

Il primo punto a favore è dovuto alla perfetta integrazione che aveva con altri programmi Autodesk, come AutoCAD e Revit. Grazie a questo ha agevolato la collaborazione e scambio di informazione tra i vari software. Le funzioni di analisi e di visualizzazione in 3D, permettono una visione più chiara e dettagliata di ciascun progetto, riducendo al minimo gli errori di progettazione.

Aspetti negativi:

Piattaforma un po’ difficile da usare per chi non ha familiarità con i prodotti Autodesk. Il prezzo è abbastanza alto, ovviamente questo è dovuto alle molteplici funzioni che offre il software, anche se non tutte sono sfruttabili al massimo.

Antonio
Receptionist (Italia)
Industria alberghiera, 2-10 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Pronto per l’esame!

4,0 4 mesi fa

Commenti: La mia esperienza con il programma è sicuramente positiva, in quanto mi ha notevolmente aiutato nel superamento dell’esame universitario di disegno tecnico al calcolatore.

Aspetti positivi:

Autodesk Construction è un programma progettato per qualsiasi tipologia di pubblico, dagli studenti ai lavoratori. Si tratta di un software che aiuta e semplifica un processo di costruzione. Ho personalmente usato tale programma in ambito universitario e mi ha notevolmente aiutato nel superamento dell’esame di disegno tecnico al calcolatore, offrendo strumenti avanzati per la gestione dei progetti e fornendo una vasta gamma di funzionalità.

Aspetti negativi:

L’unico svantaggio sta nel fatto che bisogna avere un minimo di esperienza e studio per poter lavorare con Autodesk Construction. Infatti, per ottenere ottimi risultati è necessaria una buona esperienza degli utenti nell'utilizzo del software per la realizzazione di ciascun progetto.

Taha
Civil Engineer (Italia)
Consulenza manageriale, 2-10 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Gestione della costruzione semplificata con Autodesk Construction Cloud

5,0 anno scorso

Commenti: Nel complesso, la mia esperienza con Autodesk Construction Cloud è stata positiva. Nonostante la curva di apprendimento e il costo, trovo che la piattaforma sia un'ottima soluzione per la gestione dei progetti di costruzione.

Aspetti positivi:

Uso Autodesk Construction Cloud da alcuni mesi e devo dire che sono impressionato dalle sue complete capacità di gestione dei progetti.

Aspetti negativi:

Anche se trovo che Autodesk Construction Cloud sia piuttosto vantaggioso, ho alcune preoccupazioni. Ho notato che la curva di apprendimento può essere ripida per coloro che sono nuovi sulla piattaforma, il che ha portato a una certa frustrazione iniziale.

Raffaele
Architetto e docente (Italia)
Architettura e urbanistica, Lavoratore autonomo
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Autodesk Construction Cloud: un grande potenziale ancora in miglioramento.

4,0 anno scorso

Commenti: Mediamente positiva, con ottimismo su futuri sviluppi.

Aspetti positivi:

La comodità e facilità di accedere, per tutti gli addetti ai lavori, a tutte le parti del lavoro loro competenti per consultare e confrontare i dati inseriti. Si possono seguire cantieri anche in altri continenti e condividere il tutto con altri professionisti.

Aspetti negativi:

Talvolta il software è ostico e respingente in alcune impostazioni e si percepisce quanto possa ancora esser migliorato. Può risultare faticoso comprendere notifiche e aggiornamenti.

Simone
Studente (Italia)
Ricerca, 1.001-5.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Un buon prodotto

4,0 anno scorso

Commenti: Sommariamente i software funzionano bene però ci sarebbero molte cose da migliorare

Aspetti positivi:

Le ampie funzionalità e la potenza di questi software

Aspetti negativi:

L'utilizzo di questi software è molto complesso e alcune funzioni di recente introduzione sono molto più scomode o poco convenienti rispetto a quelle precendenti

marco
Architetto (Italia)
Architettura e urbanistica, Lavoratore autonomo
Ha utilizzato il software per: Prova gratuita
Fonte della recensione

Autodesk Construction Cloud - l'essenziale per organizzare lavoro

4,0 7 mesi fa

Commenti: Abbastanza buona e interessante per più collaboratori present iin uffici diversi.

Aspetti positivi:

strumenti potenti e facili da usare per ogni flusso di lavoro nel settore edile

Aspetti negativi:

non ci sono cose da seganlare, forse il prezzo

Enzo
Studente (Italia)
Ingegneria meccanica o industriale, 5.001-10.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Abbastanza intuitivo e semplic3

4,0 anno scorso

Commenti: Tale software si trova alla base degli studi ingegneristici ed é ti fondamentale importanza

Aspetti positivi:

Software un po complesso ma dopo un corso di studio estremamente semplice nell'ambito ingegneristico

Aspetti negativi:

Purtroppo é un po pesante e su devi e datati li rallenta

Pasquale
Dipendente (Italia)
Prodotti alimentari e bevande, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 1-5 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Autodesk Construction Cloud

4,0 anno scorso

Aspetti positivi:

Buona gestione di dati e documenti per connettersi ad un ampio flusso di lavoro

Aspetti negativi:

In particolare non ho notato nessuna problematica

Cleto
Industrial designer (Italia)
Design, Lavoratore autonomo
Ha utilizzato il software per: Prova gratuita
Fonte della recensione

Costruire assieme uno studio migliore

5,0 anno scorso

Commenti: Lavorare a quattro mani su un progetto ha reso possibile il lavoro di squadra anche lavorando da paesi differenti

Aspetti positivi:

La possibilità di interagire con il flusso di lavoro dei propri collaboratori accelera il processo ideativo e implementa il lavoro di squadra favorendo la possibilità di Smartworking.

Aspetti negativi:

L interfaccia grafica potrebbe contenere piccoli accorgimenti per migliorare l’esperienza utente. Come ad esempio colori accesi.

Mathew
Mathew
Superintendent (Canada)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Industria edilizia, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Plangrid

5,0 5 mesi fa

Commenti: Great. The app is extremely intuative so the learning curve is reduced and simple. Just looks more complicated then it really is.

Aspetti positivi:

Document viewing the Field is a necessity. Linking RFI's and submittals to the drawings makes things clear and reduces misses during construction.

Aspetti negativi:

Sometimes sync issue while uploading photos and documents while changing from WIFI to LTE. Sometimes the sync needs to be cleared and redone.

David
Corporate Development Manager (USA)
Industria edilizia, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Alternative considerate:

Autodesk Construction Cloud

4,0 7 mesi fa

Commenti: Overall it was okay. The implementation team (3rd party vendor who sold the bundle to us) could have been better, but the product itself was overall good.

Aspetti positivi:

The fact that all of the modules within Build, Cost Management, and Insight tie into each other makes it very easy to create Issues connected to RFIs to Plans, etc.

Aspetti negativi:

Sometimes it can be a little clunky with how some items work on a desktop version, but not on a mobile version. In Meetings, for example, one can assign due dates and people to complete the action items on the desktop version, but you cannot assign people in the mobile version.

Alessandro
Systems Developer (USA)
Architettura e urbanistica, 2-10 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

The Determined Program for Construction Management

5,0 mese scorso Nuova

Commenti: Autodesk Construction is a determined approach that makes every construction option sustainable.

Aspetti positivi:

The cloud presence from the platform gives it an easy access, and the automation is also well enhanced.

Aspetti negativi:

The development of this software is error free, and services are incredible

Alex
CEO (Canada)
Industria edilizia, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione
Fonte: SoftwareAdvice

Alternative considerate:

Don't waste your time

2,0 5 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

cheap to get into need to fill the space for minimum number of characters

Aspetti negativi:

lack of functionality OCR is not upto par can't search text within reports

Ahmed
Professor Assistant (Marocco)
Gestione formativa, 501-1.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Connecting data, workflows, and teams

5,0 3 mesi fa

Aspetti positivi:

I use Autodesk Construction Cloud to teach students how to get the construction teams focused and collaborate through data and workflows into their final goal and aims, thanks to the different managment modules

Aspetti negativi:

I like everything about Autodesk Construction Cloud

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 10.000+ dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Alternative considerate:

Know about Autodesk Construction Cloud.

4,0 anno scorso

Commenti: Overall experience with this software is good and I will recommend others to use it.

Aspetti positivi:

It is easily manageable, portable, and handy software. We can easily collaborate with our teammates using it.

Aspetti negativi:

We need some sort of license to view files and documents.

Ricardo
Architect (Germania)
Architettura e urbanistica, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

AutoDesk is an excellent and very complete application

5,0 4 settimane fa Nuova

Commenti: Overall I am satisfied with my experience using AutoDesk. I recommend this application without a doubt.

Aspetti positivi:

It has a good variety of tools and is easy to use. It is a very complete application.

Aspetti negativi:

Need to improve the level of customer support.

arkangshu
Owner (India)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Servizi finanziari, Lavoratore autonomo
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

I recommend everyone to use Autodesk Construction Cloud

5,0 3 settimane fa Nuova

Aspetti positivi:

The most I like about Autodesk Construction Cloud is its seamless collaboration tools.

Aspetti negativi:

The least i like about Autodesk Construction Cloud is its limited customization option.

Patrick
Project Coordinator (Canada)
Industria edilizia, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 1-5 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Build seems to work good but it lacks some of the ease of use compare to other softwares.

4,0 2 settimane fa Nuova

Aspetti positivi:

Some functionality features work really well and could help with project management.

Aspetti negativi:

Some of the website design is not easily comprehensive.

Ehsan
Architectural Technician (Canada)
Architettura e urbanistica, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 1-5 mesi
Fonte della recensione

My analysis of the software

4,0 3 settimane fa Nuova

Commenti: It's great and I personally enjoy working with it

Aspetti positivi:

Easy and fast use of this software is very good.

Aspetti negativi:

Being expensive and at the same time dependent on other software

Robert
Project Engineer (USA)
Industria edilizia, 11-50 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Plan Grid Review

4,0 7 anni fa

Commenti: Plan grid has been useful for our team to be one step ahead of the game in document control. I am currently working on a larger project with multiple files, especially ASIs. As a result, the overlay capabilities makes it easier to keep up with drawings that have been superseded and have the most current jobs in the field. I like the ability to tag drawings by discipline and in my case phases. The ability to hyperlink drawings to compile an as-built set or update current drawings with referenced RFIs, ASIs or SK drawings is extremely useful. I wish that plan grid would allow users that admins share files (i.e. subcontractors) have the ability not to pay. I think the GC should be responsible for payment , management, and distribution of files. Plan grid should sell perhaps licenses to the GC company and not charge individual subs a monthly fee just to review drawings. As a result, after the trial period ended none of the subs for my job signed up to use Plan Grid. Consequently, I've been using Bluebeam Revu Studio which has similar capabilities and users download a free software through Bluebeam that allows access to all the project folder and files. What Plan Grid has over Bluebeam currently is the OCR to recognize sheet names through the plan index and this is a standard feature; however, in order for Bluebeam to mimic Plan Grids basic principle, it seems like an added cost. Overall I like the software for in-house management but as far as the sharing it with the subs and getting them to use it for a project entirety it has been a struggle. Therefore I think they should either consider lowering the rates for additional users.

Aspetti positivi:

Intuitive and ergonomic functionality. It keeps files up to date and automatically supersedes old files.

Aspetti negativi:

The cost to share with other team members. If I have a project that has multiple subs that have a Project Manager, Asst Project Manager, Field Superintendent and Foreman who need to have the most updated drawings and each has to pay the fee then it gets pricey on their end. So I think Plan Grid should sell package/licenses s to subcontractor teams so they can distribute to their team in-house which you screen through their email address.

Lance
Quality Lead (USA)
Industria edilizia, 1.001-5.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

I like the general structure of BIM 360 Field, but I have problems with specific functions.

4,0 7 anni fa

Commenti: It is great to track your punchlist and rolling completion issues. We did not use it for commissioning, but I would have liked to try it so we could link it to our 360 Glue Revit models. This looks like a very helpful option.

Aspetti positivi:

1). In the field, the iPad app is very easy to use, with the exceptions of a few small things. 2). It is especially easy for contractors to walk their Issues, take pictures, make comments, etc. 3). The print reports and schedule reports module is really helpful. There are many different report types and layout options, which is repeatedly useful. 4). It is easy to see any pertinent info in Issue list view, and print quickly from that page. 5). Customizing the different types of drop down Issue Filters for different users is very handy, and necessary. And it is very easy to sort and search for Issues using the filter module in Issue List view. 6). After I figured out how to contact tech support, it was certain that I would get a diligent response. I would say response time was always within 24 hours, unless I said it was urgent, and very through.

Aspetti negativi:

Here are common Problems our large team and I run into often: 1). The website commonly has a huge latency when loading new pages. And I mean typically 3-10 seconds, and occasionally 10-20 seconds to load a page. 2). More often than I would like, the Issue List column sorting feature at the top of each column on the website version just will not work. 3). Pinning an issue from the website version is not very intuitive, and takes you a completely different pathway to find the maps. This should be something that is easy to get to from the window of an open issue, just like the iPad app version. 4). Sometimes the syncing function has an error and you need to re-sync. 5). Not frequently, but few times more than I would have liked, the site would just not let people do things like change statuses, or on a couple of occasions even just open the site. 6). After walking in the field adding issues for a while, the iPad app will stop letting you load photos. You have to close and restart the app and you're good to go again.

JOHN
Senior VDC Engineer (USA)
Industria edilizia, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

BIM 360: A good idea, but misses the mark as a whole.

3,0 7 anni fa

Commenti: I've used BIM-360 as part of the BIM coordination process on 2 separate projects. The idea is that you store your CAD files in the cloud, and the BIM administrator for the project creates composite ("merged") models, combining all of the trade models. These merged models are stored in the cloud and are accessible from computers and ipads. The ability to view current and updated models on an ipad in the field is really the main benefit to using BIM 360, in my opinion.
Having said that, the only way that particular feature (and all of the others, for that matter) works properly, is if the project BIM manager does all of the necessary "housekeeping" so that you have good model hygiene - like using proper model origin and orientations, eliminating "space junk" from the model files. If you have any of those things, the default model view is zoomed way out, and makes it almost impossible to zoom into the model. Every time you hit the "top view" or "home view" buttons, it resets back to being zoomed way out. The BIM 360 model viewer actually works better on the ipad that it's PC application.
Other features that leave a bit to be desired are:

*Navigating the model (PC app). Saving and recalling viewpoints, and running clash detection. Navisworks Manage is far superior in all of those areas.

*If you use BIM 360 to view your model, as opposed to using Navisworks or Revit, you have to upload your CAD file every time you want to see a model update. The upload takes some time and becomes somewhat tedious. There is BIM 360 plugin for Navis Manage that allows you to log into the BIM 360 server through Navis, and view any of the merged models that have been created. So you're essentially using Navis to navigate, take viewpoints, make annotations, run clashes. But you still have to upload your own CAD file to the cloud if you want to see the changes take place in current Navis session. You can save a local copy of the model as an NWD file.
*Navigating the file/folder structure is tedious. When you download a file (another trade's CAD, for example) from Bim 360, it NEVER remembers the previous save location. Very annoying.
FINAL THOUGHTS: We scrapped BIM 360 and use only Navis and Dropbox for coordination currently. If our foremen could view an accurate and current model on an ipad in the field the product would be worth consideration. Proper BIM management makes all the difference. There are glitches, and a learning curve.

Aspetti positivi:

The ability for the field to call up the model on an ipad.

Aspetti negativi:

Everything else is inferior to currently existing market products.

Bente
BIM Manager (Germania)
Automazione industriale, 201-500 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

It's allready good, but it has to get better

4,0 7 anni fa

Commenti: Great tools. Some are very usefull (BIM360Team) and in the perfekt pricing. Some should get more funktions to be helpfull (BIM360Docs) or only should learn from the other BIM Tools. So it's not possible to view Office-Files on BIM Docs and it allready works in BIM360Team. Allso I miss the upload and update funktion of complet folders. This was possible in the old version of Team. In BIMDocs there is only the oppotunity to upload files (no folder!). So it's hard to keep the lokal and cloud area on the same database.
To share files between different Cloud Tools isn't working. Therefore the BIM Docs area is made for. I know it, but at this time it's hard to handle it.
In the end I will thank you for all the help I get from support team. You do a great job. Also, you should know, that I like the cloud-products. It's the only way to work in future and your products, with all of their mistakes, bugs and missing funktions, are the the top 5 in the world. Thanks for your innovations!

Aspetti positivi:

Many, but the most importants are: View all Data online without download them, communication, easy to use

Aspetti negativi:

Still too much missing features!!! Data lokal are not automaticly compare to the cloud and the pricing is not attraktiv for start working with the cloud. The first step should be cheap. When you place your data in the cloud, found out, that it's working fine, you mostly will not exit the system. But meanwhile you start use the system and try to invite some more, a high pricing will avoide to get the first step in the cloud. It will be helpfull that a small admin-team should be allowed to use it for free. Comercial users like worker, industrie, snd so on have to pay for it, after the admins arranged everything.

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Industria edilizia, 201-500 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Time Saving & Easy to Use

5,0 5 anni fa

Commenti: Overall, our experience with PlanGrid has been positive and we have more users on the tool than we originally anticipated because of the value it brings. The support and partnership both from our account reps and customer service is great - getting answers to our questions quickly. We also appreciate that they are open to product recommendations and ask us to participate in testing of the new functionality.

Aspetti positivi:

PlanGrid is simple and easy to use. Even our non-tech savvy people have easily transitioned to using the tool. The ability to pull up drawings and mark them up in the field saves our team time, and being able to submit field reports has increased report submission and speed (everything from dailies, safety reports, to cut sheets and more). The field report functionality was a game changer for us and adoption of the tool. Our field team likes that they can do all of these things in one place without the hassle of using multiple platforms or tools. On average, our team is saving two hours a week in time, some as many as 10-15 hours per week.

Aspetti negativi:

As a subcontractor, there is some functionality that we'd like to see changed or added to make the tool even more helpful that doesn't quite work for us right now. The RFI functionality doesn't let us use our own templates, but is in the process of being overhauled, which may help. Our field team would love to be able to make edits to documents and re-save them as documents rather than downloading, saving, and re-uploading them. Some of our team would also like better markup tools that match Bluebeam's functionality. PlanGrid isn't necessarily a project management tool, and they've shared it won't be. At some point we may look into a PM software integration to make managing projects more streamlined. For now, we're not able to complete all activities in the tool and have work arounds from the PM side.

Jeff
VDC Manager (USA)
Industria edilizia, 1.001-5.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Coordination Like Navisworks

3,0 7 anni fa

Commenti: Looking for better controls within the clash tools, better alignment with how Navisworks Manage handles clash tests. Tolerances, are not as good, as well the general navigation of clash results is slower than Navisworks. I do like the product, in general try and implement on all my larger projects - it is a great tool for a VDC manager! However construction teams are using Navisworks instead of the Glue tools for clash detection coordination. It would be more collaborative if the clash tests were hosted\tracked on the 360 Glue site - at this time its much too time consuming to track and manege the clashing on Glue site. The cloud hosted models however do make it better even in Navisworks to ensure your using the latest modeling. Another feature that I would really like to see is a managed folder structure (As administrator) I would like to have the capacity to create folders that only certain users could access (Like a client area only) this would allow me to publish modeling (Clash free) to my clients folder - they could then review the finished product.

Aspetti positivi:

Saves time in downloading and uploading - creates better collaboration by having a format all team members can review - without specialized software.

Aspetti negativi:

For construction trades to fully embrace the clash tools need to be more powerful, and "Navisworks Like". More control for owner, or client access of finished product - it generally does not translate well in review of an ongoing clash coordination model (problems may be evident and misunderstood by some clients).