--- description: Scopri le funzionalità di Modern Requirements4DevOps, i dettagli del prodotto, chi utilizza il software e quali sono i prodotti suggeriti. Attraverso le recensioni di utenti verificati potrai capire com’è la user experience, l’assistenza post-vendita e molto altro. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Modern Requirements4DevOps - Prezzi, recensioni, informazioni - Capterra Italia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software per la gestione dei requisiti](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [Modern Requirements4DevOps](/software/125390/modern-requirements-suite) # Modern Requirements4DevOps Canonical: https://www.capterra.it/software/125390/modern-requirements-suite Pagina: 1/2\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/125390/modern-requirements-suite?page=2) > Prodotti dal partner principale di Microsoft nella gestione delle esigenze dal 2015, gli strumenti colmano le lacune nella gestione delle esigenze in Azure DevOps. > > Conclusione: valutazione di **4.7/5** stelle assegnate da 19 utenti. Miglior punteggio per il parametro **Lo consiglieresti?**. ----- ## Panoramica ### Chi utilizza Modern Requirements4DevOps? Questo strumento è adatto a tutti i team che necessitano di una SSOT per le loro esigenze, test case e codici. Utilizzato da BA, PM, SA e altri professionisti su scala ridotta, media e d'impresa. ## Statistiche e valutazioni | Parametro | Valutazione | Dettaglio | | **Nel complesso** | **4.7/5** | 19 Recensioni | | Facilità d'uso | 4.3/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Assistenza clienti | 4.5/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Rapporto qualità-prezzo | 4.4/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Funzionalità | 4.4/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Percentuale di raccomandazione | 80% | (8/10 Lo consiglieresti?) | ## Informazioni sul fornitore - **Azienda**: Modern Requirements - **Area geografica**: Richmond Hill, Canada - **Anno di fondazione**: 1999 ## Contesto commerciale - **Modello tariffario**: (Versione di prova gratuita (free trial)) - **Pubblico target**: 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementazione e piattaforme**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Windows (desktop), Windows (locale), Linux (locale) - **Lingue supportate**: inglese - **Paesi disponibili**: Australia, Belgio, Brasile, Canada, Cina, Danimarca, Francia, Germania, Giappone, India, Irlanda, Italia, Lussemburgo, Messico, Nuova Zelanda, Paesi Bassi, Regno Unito, Stati Uniti, Svezia, Svizzera ## Funzionalità - Gestione del flusso di lavoro - Gestione delle modifiche - Prioritizzazione ## Integrazioni (1 in totale) - Azure DevOps Server ## Opzioni di supporto - Email/Help desk - Knowledge Base - Assistenza telefonica - Assistenza diretta 24 ore su 24 - Chat ## Categoria - [Software per la gestione dei requisiti](https://www.capterra.it/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Alternative 1. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.it/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3715 reviews) 2. [reqSuite® rm](https://www.capterra.it/software/162954/reqsuite) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 3. [ReqView](https://www.capterra.it/software/145388/reqview) — 4.6/5 (49 reviews) 4. [Jira](https://www.capterra.it/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15459 reviews) 5. [TraceCloud](https://www.capterra.it/software/135649/tracecloud) — 4.1/5 (67 reviews) ## Recensioni ### "Elicitation tools made stakeholder input so much easier" — 5.0/5 > **Rahul** | *3 agosto 2026* | Ospedali e sistemi sanitari | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: The elicitation features in Modern Requirements4DevOps let non-technical stakeholders comment and contribute directly on requirements without needing Azure DevOps training. That alone cut down so many clarification meetings. > > **Inconvenienti**: A few stakeholders still found the commenting interface a bit busy at first. Took some hand holding early on before they navigated it comfortably on their own. > > Gathering requirements from business stakeholders used to mean endless email chains. Now they weigh in directly inside Modern Requirements4DevOps, and we capture their input without losing context or version history. ----- ### "Change tracking caught things we would've missed" — 5.0/5 > **Deepak** | *4 agosto 2026* | Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Honestly the change tracking in Modern Requirements4DevOps has saved us more than once. It flagged a downstream requirement that would've been affected by an edit nobody thought to check. > > **Inconvenienti**: The change history log gets long fast on active projects. Filtering through it to find one specific edit from weeks ago isn't as quick as I'd like > > We kept shipping changes without realizing what else they touched. Change tracking inside Modern Requirements4DevOps now catches those ripple effects before they turn into bigger problems later. ----- ### "Made audits feel almost painless, which is rare" — 5.0/5 > **Pallavi** | *3 agosto 2026* | Software informatici | Tasso di raccomandazione: 3.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: I was genuinely impressed by how Modern Requirements4DevOps's Impact Analysis timestamps every single change. Our last audit was the smoothest one we've had, no scrambling for evidence. > > **Inconvenienti**: Copilot4DevOps still needs a lot of hand-holding for anything technical. It's a nice starting point but I always end up rewriting most of what it drafts. > > We needed a clean audit trail without maintaining a separate spreadsheet. The traceability matrix inside Modern Requirements4DevOps now does that automatically, and it's honestly been a relief. ----- ### "Brings Teams together & makes managing requirements in ADO easier" — 5.0/5 > **Utente Verificato** | *5 maggio 2026* | Marketing e pubblicità | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: The best thing about Modern Requirements is that is makes teamwork easier by keeping all requirements and documents in one place > > **Inconvenienti**: Some of the advanced features take some time to get used to. The tool has a lot of depth and could feel overwhelming at first. > > Experience has been positive. It has helped bringing requirements, traceability, documentation in one place which in turn is helping manage projects much smoother. Collaboration across teams has improved and integration with ADO has been easy. ----- ### "Work item linking made everything finally connected" — 5.0/5 > **Harsh** | *16 agosto 2026* | Software informatici | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: The way work items link naturally across requirements, tests, and code genuinely impressed me. I could finally see the full picture of a feature inside Azure DevOps without hunting through separate boards. > > **Inconvenienti**: Untangling links on an older project with messy history took more effort than expected. Cleaner going forward though. > > I didn't realize how disconnected our work items were until this fixed it. Modern Requirements4DevOps genuinely made our project feel like one coherent system instead of scattered pieces. ----- Pagina: 1/2\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/125390/modern-requirements-suite?page=2) ## Link - [Visualizza su Capterra](https://www.capterra.it/software/125390/modern-requirements-suite) ## Questa pagina è disponibile nelle seguenti lingue | Lingua | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Dati strutturati