--- description: Scopri le funzionalità di N-central, i dettagli del prodotto, chi utilizza il software e quali sono i prodotti suggeriti. Attraverso le recensioni di utenti verificati potrai capire com’è la user experience, l’assistenza post-vendita e molto altro. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: N-central - Prezzi, recensioni, informazioni - Capterra Italia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software per la gestione degli asset IT](/directory/30077/it-asset-management/software) > [N-central](/software/13803/n-central) # N-central Canonical: https://www.capterra.it/software/13803/n-central Pagina: 1/11\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/13803/n-central?page=2) > La piattaforma di monitoraggio e gestione remota N-central® di N-able® è progettata per semplificare la gestione di reti IT complesse. > > Conclusione: valutazione di **4.2/5** stelle assegnate da 253 utenti. Miglior punteggio per il parametro **Lo consiglieresti?**. ----- ## Panoramica ### Chi utilizza N-central? Fornitori di servizi IT in espansione e fornitori di servizi gestiti (Managed Service Provider, MSP) ## Statistiche e valutazioni | Parametro | Valutazione | Dettaglio | | **Nel complesso** | **4.2/5** | 253 Recensioni | | Facilità d'uso | 4.0/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Assistenza clienti | 3.9/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Rapporto qualità-prezzo | 3.9/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Funzionalità | 4.2/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Percentuale di raccomandazione | 70% | (7/10 Lo consiglieresti?) | ## Informazioni sul fornitore - **Azienda**: N-able ## Contesto commerciale - **Prezzo di partenza**: 1,75 USD - **Modello tariffario**: (Versione di prova gratuita (free trial)) - **Pubblico target**: 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementazione e piattaforme**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Windows (locale), Linux (locale), Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Lingue supportate**: inglese - **Paesi disponibili**: Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua e Barbuda, Arabia Saudita, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaigian, Bahamas, Bahrein, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belgio, Benin, Bermuda e altri 177 ## Funzionalità - Accesso/Controllo remoto - Alerts/Escalation - Amministrazione di base - Analisi dei dati comportamentali - Avvisi/Notifiche - Backup e ripristino - Controllo accessi/Autorizzazioni - Creazione di report/analisi - Dashboard - Gestione app - Gestione degli audit - Gestione dei dispositivi - Gestione dei problemi - Gestione dei ticket di assistenza - Gestione del BYOD - Gestione della configurazione - Gestione della conformità - Gestione delle attività - Gestione delle capacità - Gestione delle implementazioni - Gestione delle modifiche - Gestione delle patch - Gestione di contratti/licenze - Gestione di tutta la rete - Gestione e monitoraggio da remoto - Gestione polizze - Implementazione automatica delle patch - Monitoraggio - Monitoraggio dei cespiti - Monitoraggio dei costi - Monitoraggio della conformità - Monitoraggio della larghezza di banda - Monitoraggio delle attività - Monitoraggio delle prestazioni - Monitoraggio e accesso da remoto - Parametri prestazionali - Per MSP - Pianificazione della manutenzione - Portale self-service - Programmazione - Quadro della attività - Rapporti IT - Real-Time Data - Real-Time Monitoring - Real-Time Notifications - Registro eventi - Rendicontazione e analisi statistiche - Rilevamento automatico di dispositivi - Scansione delle vulnerabilità - Scansioni automatiche ... e altre 18 funzionalità ## Integrazioni (37 in totale) - 1Password - Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud - Actifile - AlertOps - Automox - Autotask PSA - Auvik - Barracuda Intronis Backup - BrightGauge - Cisco Meraki - CloudBlue - Computicate PSA - ConnectWise PSA - DNSFilter - DeskDay ... e altre 22 integrazioni ## Opzioni di supporto - Email/Help desk - FAQ/Forum - Knowledge Base - Assistenza telefonica ## Categoria - [Software per la gestione degli asset IT](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30077/it-asset-management/software) ## Categorie correlate - [Software per la gestione degli asset IT](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30077/it-asset-management/software) - [Software per network management](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30018/network-management/software) - [Software per la protezione degli endpoint](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30907/endpoint-protection/software) - [IT, Server & Network Monitoring Software](https://www.capterra.it/directory/32713/server-monitoring/software) - [Software di IT Management](https://www.capterra.it/directory/10001/it-management/software) ## Alternative 1. [Atera](https://www.capterra.it/software/144309/atera) — 4.5/5 (449 reviews) 2. [N-sight RMM](https://www.capterra.it/software/163344/n-sight) — 4.3/5 (200 reviews) 3. [IT Glue](https://www.capterra.it/software/170401/itglue) — 4.6/5 (340 reviews) 4. [ManageEngine OpManager MSP](https://www.capterra.it/software/212602/manageengine-opmanager-msp) — 4.4/5 (73 reviews) 5. [NinjaOne](https://www.capterra.it/software/165889/ninjaone) — 4.7/5 (293 reviews) ## Recensioni ### "Best Partner, Product is improving quickly." — 5.0/5 > **Joshua** | *6 giugno 2025* | Computer e sicurezza della rete | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: It's ability to handle 3rd party patches is significant for being a default feature set. They also have built a great first pane of glass experience. > > **Inconvenienti**: N-Central does not have the ability to automate against the system itself. This has required my team to work around some of the constraints instead of building exactly what they need. > > N-Able's partnership is not to be matched. They're a great partner. When they promise a feature they deliver it and they're hard at work building the most scalable traditional RMM product that will exist in the market. ----- ### "Great RMM and remote tool. MSP Manager great for our internal IT ticketing." — 4.0/5 > **brad** | *28 aprile 2026* | Internet | Tasso di raccomandazione: 7.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: What stands out most about N-able N-central is how it consolidates monitoring, management, and automation into a single, scalable platform. The unified dashboard gives clear visibility across endpoints, servers, and network devices without needing to jump between tools. Automation policies—especially for patching and remediation—save a significant amount of manual effort and reduce human error. Remote access is fast and reliable, which is critical for day-to-day support. > > **Inconvenienti**: While N-able N-central is a strong platform overall, performance can be inconsistent at times. Certain actions—like loading dashboards, executing remote tasks, or navigating between views—can feel slower than expected, especially during peak usage. This can impact efficiency when quick responses are needed. Additionally, support responsiveness has been hit-or-miss. While the team is knowledgeable, there are instances where response times lag or follow-ups take longer than ideal, particularly during urgent situations. Improving platform speed consistency and tightening support turnaround times would make a noticeable difference in the overall experience. > > It provides a solid, centralized platform for monitoring, patch management, and remote support, which helps streamline workflows and reduce the need for multiple tools. The automation capabilities are a major advantage, allowing routine maintenance and issue remediation to run with minimal manual intervention. While there are occasional slowdowns and support response times can vary, the system itself is stable and capable at scale. For organizations managing multiple endpoints or clients, it delivers strong value and dependable performance overall. ----- ### "N-Central / N-Able Review" — 3.0/5 > **Christian** | *28 aprile 2026* | Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione | Tasso di raccomandazione: 3.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: The alerting system is highly reliable, ensuring that critical issues are flagged immediately without constant noise. Deployment of the agent is generally straightforward across various environments, which saves a significant amount of time during onboarding. Additionally, the patch management engine does a solid job of keeping third-party software and OS versions up to date, providing a dependable baseline for security and system stability across our managed endpoints. > > **Inconvenienti**: 1. General Technical Support The support experience has become increasingly frustrating, often feeling like a hurdle rather than a resource. Response times are inconsistent, and there is a noticeable lack of deep technical expertise during initial contact, leading to prolonged downtimes for critical issues. 2. Adlumin Support Support for the Adlumin integration is particularly poor, often resulting in a "finger-pointing" loop where no one takes responsibility. It is difficult to get a straight answer or a specialist who actually understands the nuances of the integration. 3. Lack of Issue Ownership There is a glaring lack of accountability when it comes to taking ownership of open issues. Tickets frequently sit in limbo or are passed between departments without a primary point of contact ensuring the problem is actually resolved to completion. 4. Difficulty with Escalations The escalation process is opaque and incredibly slow. Even when a ticket is clearly beyond the scope of Tier 1, getting it moved to a senior engineer feels like an uphill battle, causing simple technical roadblocks to turn into multi-day ordeals. 5. Automation Policy Limitations (No PowerShell) The inability to natively use PowerShell within automation policies is a major step backward for modern IT environments. Forcing us to use a restrictive, proprietary builder instead of industry-standard scripting severely limits our ability to automate complex tasks. 6. Search Query Regressions A recent update broke the search functionality so that it no longer auto-updates the query results as you type or change parameters. This small but vital UI regression adds unnecessary clicks and friction to what should be a basic, streamlined workflow. 7. Poor Reporting Features The reporting engine is severely lacking and feels outdated. The formatting is strange and unprofessional, making it difficult to hand these documents directly to clients without extensive manual editing or external tools to make the data digestible. 8. Misplaced AI Focus The aggressive push for AI feels like a distraction from core platform stability. Instead of developing AI to solve "non-issues," the development team needs to prioritize fixing the long-standing bugs and workflow limitations that partners deal with every single day. > > The overall experience with N-able is a study in frustration between a solid, functional core and a deteriorating support and development ecosystem. On a technical level, the platform delivers on its primary promises: the alerting is dependable, and the agent deployment and patch management provide a reliable foundation for basic endpoint maintenance. When the "lights are on," the software does exactly what it needs to do to keep a fleet stable. However, the experience begins to sour as soon as you attempt to scale into advanced automation or require vendor assistance. The restriction against native PowerShell in automation policies is a massive hurdle for any modern, script-heavy MSP workflow, forcing a reliance on clunky, proprietary tools. These technical "paper cuts"—like the regressive search UI and lackluster reporting—are compounded by a support structure that seems to lack accountability and a clear escalation path, especially regarding integrations like Adlumin. Ultimately, using N-able feels like driving a reliable car where the manufacturer has stopped listening to the drivers. While the "engine" (patching and alerts) is strong, the "dashboard" (UI/Reports) is dated, and the "service center" (Support) is unresponsive. The recent pivot toward AI features feels like a missed mark; the platform would be far more valuable if the developers focused on refining existing workflows and fixing long-standing bugs rather than chasing industry buzzwords. It remains a "good enough" tool for basic needs, but it is becoming increasingly difficult to justify for high-level automation and complex support requirements. ----- ### "N-central was easy to quickly setup and deploy for our company" — 4.0/5 > **Bill** | *28 aprile 2026* | Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: We liked the user interface and management processes the most about deploying n-central. The user interface is very streamlined and helps greatly for navigation between clients. > > **Inconvenienti**: The only downside we've had at this time is sometimes getting customer support on the phone, we'd really like it if it were a more consistent experience about who speak with on the phone when issues come up. > > Our overall experience with N-central has been very good and we'd recommend it to others companies similar to our who are looking for alternatives to Kaseya and Connectwise like we were when we started looking for a new RMM partner. ----- ### "Reliable and Powerful RMM Platform for MSP Growth" — 5.0/5 > **Sean** | *11 maggio 2026* | Computer e sicurezza della rete | Tasso di raccomandazione: 9.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: N-central provides excellent visibility and centralized management across all client environments. The automation capabilities, device monitoring, patch management, and remote access tools significantly reduce administrative overhead, improve response times, and deliver a strong ROI by saving both time and operational costs. Its flexibility and scalability make it ideal for managing both small and large customer environments, and their customer support team is knowledgeable, responsive, and helpful when resolving issues or optimizing platform performance. > > **Inconvenienti**: The initial setup and learning curve can be challenging, especially for new administrators. Some advanced configurations and policy tuning require deeper product knowledge, and the interface can occasionally feel cluttered when navigating complex environments. > > Overall, my experience with N-central has been very positive. It has become a core platform in our managed services operations, allowing us to streamline endpoint management, automate repetitive tasks, improve patch compliance, and proactively monitor client systems. Its robust feature set and reliable performance have helped us deliver better service and support to our customers. ----- Pagina: 1/11\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/13803/n-central?page=2) ## Link - [Visualizza su Capterra](https://www.capterra.it/software/13803/n-central) ## Questa pagina è disponibile nelle seguenti lingue | Lingua | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Dati strutturati