--- description: Scopri le funzionalità di HackerRank, i dettagli del prodotto, chi utilizza il software e quali sono i prodotti suggeriti. Attraverso le recensioni di utenti verificati potrai capire com’è la user experience, l’assistenza post-vendita e molto altro. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: HackerRank - Prezzi, recensioni, informazioni - Capterra Italia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software per pre-selezioni](/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) > [HackerRank](/software/143549/hackerrank) # HackerRank Canonical: https://www.capterra.it/software/143549/hackerrank Pagina: 1/5\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/143549/hackerrank?page=2) > Permette ai selezionatori nel settore tecnologico di selezionare, tenere a colloquio e assumere i migliori talenti. > > Conclusione: valutazione di **4.5/5** stelle assegnate da 93 utenti. Miglior punteggio per il parametro **Lo consiglieresti?**. ----- ## Panoramica ### Chi utilizza HackerRank? Qualsiasi azienda che abbia bisogno di assumere talenti in ambito tecnologico come ingegneri, programmatori, amministratori di Linux, analisti di database, sviluppatori mobili e altro ancora. ## Statistiche e valutazioni | Parametro | Valutazione | Dettaglio | | **Nel complesso** | **4.5/5** | 93 Recensioni | | Facilità d'uso | 4.6/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Assistenza clienti | 4.4/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Rapporto qualità-prezzo | 4.3/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Funzionalità | 4.5/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Percentuale di raccomandazione | 90% | (9/10 Lo consiglieresti?) | ## Informazioni sul fornitore - **Azienda**: HackerRank - **Anno di fondazione**: 2012 ## Contesto commerciale - **Prezzo di partenza**: 199,00 USD - **Modello tariffario**: (Versione di prova gratuita (free trial)) - **Pubblico target**: 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementazione e piattaforme**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop) - **Lingue supportate**: inglese - **Paesi disponibili**: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua e Barbuda, Arabia Saudita, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaigian, Bahamas, Bahrein, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belgio, Belize e altri 208 ## Funzionalità - Assegnazione di voti - Classificazione automatica - Confronto di candidati - Creazione di report/analisi - Creazione di test/quiz - Domande personalizzabili - Gestione candidati - Gestione dei colloqui - Gestione dei modelli - Gestione delle valutazioni - Importazione/Esportazione di dati - Libreria di domande - Libreria di test predefiniti - Modelli - Monitoraggio candidati - Parametri prestazionali - Programmazione dei colloqui - Prove online - Strumenti collaborativi - Test personalizzabili - Test prima dell'assunzione - Test/Valutazioni - Valutazione delle competenze ## Integrazioni (6 in totale) - Avature - Greenhouse - JazzHR - Jobvite - Lever - Workable ## Opzioni di supporto - Email/Help desk - FAQ/Forum - Knowledge Base - Assistenza telefonica - Assistenza diretta 24 ore su 24 - Chat ## Categoria - [Software per pre-selezioni](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) ## Categorie correlate - [Software per pre-selezioni](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) - [Software per la valutazione delle competenze](https://www.capterra.it/directory/31117/assessment/software) - [Software ATS](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30060/applicant-tracking/software) - [Software per la selezione del personale](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30602/recruiting/software) ## Alternative 1. [100Hires](https://www.capterra.it/software/206957/100hires) — 4.9/5 (1195 reviews) 2. [ZipRecruiter](https://www.capterra.it/software/130706/ziprecruiter) — 4.2/5 (10949 reviews) 3. [NEOGOV](https://www.capterra.it/software/75288/neogov) — 4.5/5 (850 reviews) 4. [Indeed for Employers](https://www.capterra.it/software/161381/indeed) — 4.5/5 (7613 reviews) 5. [Zoho Recruit](https://www.capterra.it/software/125768/zoho-recruit) — 4.5/5 (1272 reviews) ## Recensioni ### "A Reliable Hiring Tool with Room to Grow Beyond Coding" — 4.0/5 > **Prishi** | *14 luglio 2026* | Software informatici | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Key highlights include: Candidate activity monitoring – The platform tracks time-on-screen and captures screen size metadata, which helps reviewers assess candidate behavior and flag potential anomalies during assessments. Question library \& defaults – Adding default/pre-built questions is straightforward, making it easy to standardize assessments across roles without starting from scratch each time. Ease of setup – The overall configuration experience is intuitive, reducing the administrative overhead for hiring teams. These features collectively make HackerRank a strong choice for teams looking to run structured, auditable technical interviews at scale. > > **Inconvenienti**: While HackerRank excels in many areas, there are a few friction points worth noting: Custom question creation is cumbersome – Adding custom questions is not straightforward and can be time-consuming, especially for teams that need to tailor assessments beyond the default library. The process lacks the simplicity you'd expect given how polished the rest of the platform is. Diagram-based questions are challenging for candidates – When assessments include custom diagrams or drawing-type questions, candidates often struggle with the interface. The drawing tools are not intuitive, which can introduce unnecessary friction during the test and may affect performance for reasons unrelated to the candidate's actual skill. These limitations are worth considering if your hiring process relies heavily on custom or visual problem formats — in such cases, supplementing HackerRank with a dedicated diagramming or whiteboarding tool may be necessary. > > HackerRank is a solid platform for conducting technical assessments, particularly for programming and coding-focused evaluations. The built-in question library, candidate monitoring features, and ease of standardizing assessments make it a reliable choice for most engineering hiring workflows. That said, the platform has room to grow in certain areas: Architectural \& system design questions – HackerRank is not yet optimized for architecture-style assessments. The tooling for whiteboarding, diagramming, and evaluating system design thinking feels underdeveloped compared to its strong coding evaluation capabilities. ----- ### "Outstanding Partnership and Value" — 5.0/5 > **Georgia** | *27 febbraio 2026* | Software informatici | Tasso di raccomandazione: 10.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: How it enabled us to scale and to improve our processes. The platform is incredibly easy to navigate and use. It gives us a great window into how someone will perform in their interviews and shifting to live coding interviews has been game changing. > > **Inconvenienti**: In the interviews the video aspect isn't great and could potentially be smoother if it ran through Google Meet instead. > > Hugely positive. The team are great and very responsive, they are as invested as we are to innovate and overcome challenges and this makes for a fantastic partnership. Working with them has allowed us to run new processes, have reliable data to back up changes and trust in what we are trying to build - together. Excellent value for money, helping us to save vast amounts whilst not faltering on quality. ----- ### "Hackerrank review" — 5.0/5 > **Rajul** | *18 giugno 2026* | Reti informatiche | Tasso di raccomandazione: 10.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: \* Scalable technical assessments that allow evaluation of large candidate pools efficiently. \* Objective and standardized evaluation, helping reduce bias in the screening process. \* Wide library of role-based questions across coding, SQL, AI/ML, security, and other technical domain > > **Inconvenienti**: Extremely hard DSA \* Competitive programming questions \* Questions that feel unrelated to the actual role > > Overall, our experience with HackerRank has been positive. The platform has enabled us to efficiently assess technical talent at scale through standardized and objective evaluations. Its extensive question library, assessment customization options, and integrity features have helped improve the quality of candidate screening while reducing manual effort ----- ### "Easy assessment management, but the candidate experience needs improvement" — 3.0/5 > **Flavia** | *10 agosto 2026* | Reclutamento e selezione del personale | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: From a recruiter’s perspective, HackerRank makes technical assessments easy to send and monitor. Its integration with Ashby allows me to see when a candidate completes an assessment and whether they passed, without having to request updates from the technical team. This makes standardized technical screening easier to manage at scale. > > **Inconvenienti**: Assessment invitations expire too quickly in our current setup, which creates unnecessary follow-up work when candidates cannot complete them in time. The Ashby integration shows whether a candidate passed, but does not provide recruiters with a detailed breakdown of the results. Candidates have also reported technical issues, including assessments becoming stuck. When an assessment contains multiple sections, the total time available is not always clear enough, and some candidates have run out of time before completing the second section. I would also like greater transparency around integrity monitoring. One candidate reported that consulting documentation and switching browser tabs generated a cheating-related concern. Tab activity may be useful as one signal, but it needs sufficient context because checking documentation can be part of a realistic development workflow. > > I use HackerRank from the recruiter side rather than managing or creating the technical assessments. It is convenient for sending tests, monitoring completion, and viewing pass or fail results through Ashby. This reduces manual coordination and makes the technical screening stage easier to track. However, my visibility into the actual results is limited, and recurring candidate complaints about unclear timing, technical issues, and integrity monitoring affect the overall experience. It is a useful screening tool, but assessment configuration and candidate communication need to be handled carefully to avoid losing qualified candidates for reasons unrelated to their technical ability. ----- ### "Very Satisfied with our Partnership with HackerRank\!" — 5.0/5 > **Tyra** | *19 marzo 2026* | Software informatici | Tasso di raccomandazione: 10.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: We absolutely love the support we get when working with the HackerRank team. We've been working with \[sensitive content hidden\] for years now, and we are not shy about telling her that she is one of our favorite vendors to work with. \[sensitive content hidden\] goes out of her way to ensure we are fully informed on new offerings and opportunities to take advantage of. The HackerRank team is dedicated to making sure we are satisfied with their product. We had a few questions about a new offering recently, and their team offered to hold a session to walk our team through a demo and hold a Q\&A to ensure we felt enabled and empowered\! > > **Inconvenienti**: There's nothing that we would categorize as "disliking" about HackerRank. We have thoroughly enjoyed our partnership so far. > > Overall, our experience with HackerRank has been exceptionally positive. We feel very confident in the product, and the HackerRank team enables us to get the best use out of the partnership. ----- Pagina: 1/5\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/143549/hackerrank?page=2) ## Link - [Visualizza su Capterra](https://www.capterra.it/software/143549/hackerrank) ## Questa pagina è disponibile nelle seguenti lingue | Lingua | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Dati strutturati