Da 18 anni aiutiamo le aziende
a scegliere i migliori software

Responsive (formerly RFPIO)

Responsive (formerly RFPIO)

Cos'è Responsive (formerly RFPIO)?

Il software basato sul cloud di RFPIO aiuta a semplificare la gestione delle proposte nel processo di risposta alle RFP. La soluzione automatizza le funzioni di importazione ed esportazione, centralizza i contenuti e facilita la collaborazione tra le parti interessate.
Una libreria di risposte dinamica, arricchita da un motore di raccomandazione intelligente, fornisce contenuti centralizzati e un hub di collaborazione.
Le integrazioni tecnologiche consentono ai team di connettersi istantaneamente a persone e a contenuti e report e dashboard offrono una chiara visibilità sui progressi delle RFP.

Chi utilizza Responsive (formerly RFPIO)?

RFPIO offre ROI a organizzazioni di tutte le dimensioni e settori che rispondono alle RFP. Guarda il ROI in maniera istantanea attraverso una configurazione chiara, un'interfaccia utente semplice e intuitiva e integrazioni solide.

Responsive (formerly RFPIO) Software - 1
Responsive (formerly RFPIO) Software - 2
Responsive (formerly RFPIO) Software - 3
Responsive (formerly RFPIO) Software - 4
Responsive (formerly RFPIO) Software - 5

Hai dubbi su Responsive (formerly RFPIO)? Confrontalo con un'alternativa popolare

Responsive (formerly RFPIO)

Responsive (formerly RFPIO)

4,6 (151)
Nessun prezzo trovato
Versione gratuita
Prova gratuita
57
21
4,5 (151)
4,6 (151)
4,6 (151)
VS.
Prezzo di partenza
Prezzi
Caratteristiche
Integrazioni
Facilità d'uso
Rapporto qualità-prezzo
Servizio clienti
8,00 USD
mese
Versione gratuita
Prova gratuita
466
34
4,5 (5.417)
4,3 (5.417)
4,4 (5.417)
Le barre di valutazione verdi mostrano il prodotto con il risultato migliore in base alla valutazione media e al numero di recensioni.

Altre alternative interessanti a Responsive (formerly RFPIO)

monday.com
Funzionalità più votate
Feedback a 360 gradi
Identificazione del prodotto
Monitoraggio dell'inventario
Expedience Proposal Software
Funzionalità più votate
Gestione dei contenuti
Gestione di documenti
Modelli
Qvidian
Funzionalità più votate
Le funzionalità di questo prodotto non hanno ancora ricevuto valutazioni dagli utenti.
Jackrabbit Swim
Funzionalità più votate
Fatturazione e contabilizzazione
Gestione degli studenti
Monitoraggio delle presenze
QorusDocs
Funzionalità più votate
Controllo accessi/Autorizzazioni
Gestione di documenti
Modelli
Kudos
Funzionalità più votate
Manager-to-Employee Recognition
Programmi di ricompensa per dipendenti
Riconoscimento tra pari
RocketDocs
Funzionalità più votate
Le funzionalità di questo prodotto non hanno ancora ricevuto valutazioni dagli utenti.
Loopio
Funzionalità più votate
Gestione del flusso di lavoro
Gestione offerte
Monitoraggio della data di scadenza
Wrike
Funzionalità più votate
Calcolo delle ore di straordinario
Creazione di dashboard
Flusso di lavoro configurabile

Recensioni su Responsive (formerly RFPIO)

Punteggio medio

Nel complesso
4,6
Facilità d'uso
4,5
Servizio clienti
4,6
Caratteristiche
4,4
Rapporto qualità-prezzo
4,6

Recensioni per dimensioni dell'azienda (numero di dipendenti)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Trova recensioni per valutazione

5
66%
4
30%
3
1%
2
2%
1
1%
Brian
Brian
Sr RFP Manager (USA)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Software informatici, 501-1.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Alternative considerate:

Affordable, comprehensive platform with superior admin / user support

5,0 6 anni fa

Commenti: Hundreds of hours saved in responding to questionnaires and RFPs. RFPIO offers very competitive cost savings over most of the larger RFP software providers. The same functionality at a fraction of the cost of the big guys. Customer support is top notch - all questions or requests for help are addressed within the same day (or within 24 hours at most). Great, direct support from the management team - no call centers, no outsourced product support. You get assistance from people who helped build the product.

Aspetti positivi:

RFPIO's answer library is a miracle with great features. The library provides a way to assign different owners and keep individual Q&A pairs updated in real. Access to our stock answers saves our users and SMEs hundreds of hours each quarter and affords them more time to devote to their primary job functions while spending less time on researching technical responses.

Aspetti negativi:

RFPIO is great for small to moderate sized teams. For larger organizations who complete 20 or more RFPs per month with multiple RFP teams working at the same time, multiple, parallel instances of RFPIO may be needed to best suit those needs on a grand scale.

Risposta di Responsive (formerly RFPIO)

6 anni fa

Thank you, Brian! Hundreds of hours saved...time we're sure well spent! We appreciate your kind words, especially about our support team. We try to have our experts be accessible whenever possible. Thanks again for the high marks and thoughtful review!

Bill
Global Institutional Sales Support and Client Relations (Canada)
Gestione degli investimenti, 501-1.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Alternative considerate:

Extreme Time Saver

5,0 6 mesi fa

Commenti: Responsive has helped increase my job efficiency greatly. With the platform, I'm able to easily add and remove Q/A pairings as well as leverage the current pairings we have in the database with ease. The ability to filter for certain things using the tags or collections feature helps me find things a lot quicker and remove any irrelevant items, ensuring the answers always pertain to exactly what I'm looking for. The only critiques I have with it are small ones which can be fixed or a new feature could be added to mitigate the problem. Overall, it's a very helpful platform that I encourage others in the industry to use, to help fill out questionnaires, as it has saved my team and I countless hours a year with the answering process.

Aspetti positivi:

- Very user friendly - Smooth transitions between tabs and sections - Lots of options for sorting and filtering - "Collections" feature is extremely helpful

Aspetti negativi:

- Copy and paste function sometimes doesn't work properly - When I'm in a Q/A pair, I'm unable to see what (if any) collection the pair is a part of. You can see this with the tags, so I'd like to see it with collections as well

Deirdre
Proposal Specialist (USA)
Servizi finanziari, 501-1.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

I recommend.

4,0 2 mesi fa

Commenti: I enjoy using Responsive 99% of the time.

Aspetti positivi:

It is fairly intuitive and have most of the features that I want. Definitely easier to use than another other similar product I've used.

Aspetti negativi:

Would like a little more sophistication in some functions such as excluding certain items permanently from the duplication report. I also still manually load excel workbooks because the program has problems properly sorting complicated worksheets.

Nelson
Sr Solutions Consultant (USA)
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 501-1.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Not that useful

1,0 anno scorso

Commenti: Not good. Very frustrating using this product. I wish we used another tool.

Aspetti positivi:

The progress tracking is nice and the ability to tag people for help on questions is useful.

Aspetti negativi:

The search is terrible. It constantly misidentifies what I'm searching for and shows completely unrelated results. Searching for answers is our main use case for this tool and it fails pretty miserably. I waste a lot of time in Responsive looking for things that should be straightforward. Its always a crapshoot importing documents, a lot of time it messes up identifying the right questions and answers and i've lost track of how many times the answers get exported to the wrong cell.

Suyasha
Senior Associate - Solution Design (India)
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 5.001-10.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Responsive - Respond to Proposals effectively and efficiently!

5,0 3 mesi fa

Commenti: Using Responsive's AI-powered content library for GEP's proposal management activity has significantly streamlined the proposal creation process and improved the quality and consistency of responses.

Aspetti positivi:

1. Quick Access to Relevant Content: Responsive AI has made it easy to find the most relevant materials for any proposal. This reduces time spent searching for content, improving efficiency and consistency. 2. Improved Consistency and Accuracy: Responsive has helped standardize language and style across different proposals, ensuring that branding and messaging remain consistent. It also reduces errors by providing content that has been vetted for accuracy and relevance. Reduced Proposal Turnaround Time: With streamlined access to content, automated suggestions, and faster assembly, Responsive content libraries has significantly shorten the proposal development cycle.

Aspetti negativi:

I understand that the AI references the Content Library, but I would also like it to include responses based on information from documents uploaded to the tool.

Cindy
Senior Manager of Business Development (USA)
Software informatici, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Alternative considerate:

Responsive at Work

5,0 10 mesi fa

Commenti: Excellent, we like the collaboration with all team members and the Q&A setup.

Aspetti positivi:

Ease of proposal creation, and the ability to have an easily accessible and up-to-date content library.

Aspetti negativi:

We had some initial issues with answers not uploading correctly. It was resolved with the customer service team.

Deepak
Consultant (India)
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 5.001-10.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Responsive: My Honest Feedback

4,0 3 mesi fa

Commenti: Responsive has revolutionized our proposal process. The AI-powered features, collaboration tools, and centralized library have significantly improved our efficiency and proposal quality.

Aspetti positivi:

I love how Responsive has centralized our proposal process. It's much easier to manage multiple RFPs simultaneously, and the version control is excellent.

Aspetti negativi:

It took some time to fully understand the platform's capabilities and navigate the interface.

Stefano
Proposal Operations Associate (USA)
Salute, benessere e fitness, 201-500 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Great use of AI

5,0 2 settimane fa Nuova

Commenti: I overall love Responsive, and would recommend using it to anyone

Aspetti positivi:

I like it’s user interface, and the use of AI.

Aspetti negativi:

I do not think the question matching is as good as it could be.

Matthew
Content Automation Assistant (UK)
Software informatici, 201-500 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 1-5 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Good product, could do with more customisation

4,0 2 mesi fa Nuova

Commenti: Overall quite good. took a while to get use to and learn most of the functionalities, but it is a very effective tool.

Aspetti positivi:

I like how it acts as as repository for our Q&As and can also help with projects.

Aspetti negativi:

I don't like the lack of functionality around custom fields. For my company it is really important the AI doesn't give wrong info based on wrong product version.`

ERIC
Proposal Manager (USA)
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 201-500 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Response to Responsive

4,0 2 settimane fa Nuova

Commenti: Not used all the time but it can be a timesaver when utilized propoerly.

Aspetti positivi:

Repository for all responses, ease of use, filtering

Aspetti negativi:

Updates to the database of responses needs to be constantly maintained

Justin
Proposal Manager (USA)
Software informatici, 201-500 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Alternative considerate:

RFPIO makes creating a knowledge base easy

5,0 6 anni fa

Commenti: RFPIO has saved our team and our resources a great deal of time. The more that we have used the tool - the more work we have pre-empted for our SMEs who used to answer any requirements matrices in their entirety.

Aspetti positivi:

The Answer Library is by far the most useful feature for our team. Automatically capturing these responses, and manually tagging them with metadata makes search and retrieval easy - and also narrows results in suggested answers significantly making it easy to find what you are looking for (as long as it was capture in a previous project).

Aspetti negativi:

We have no really managed to use this as an end-to-end solution yet. It is designed to use that way, but many of our Styles were incompatible with system fonts when we began using the product.

Risposta di Responsive (formerly RFPIO)

6 anni fa

Thank you, Justin! Glad to hear the Answer Library is working so well for you. We are always adding fonts and updating the application to accommodate style guides, so you may want to check for updates or reach out to us with recommendations!

Vanishree
Custom Software Engineering Analytst (India)
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 5.001-10.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Responsive: A tool that makes RFP easier

5,0 10 mesi fa

Aspetti positivi:

RFP and workflow management becomes very easy with this tool. The content library and review cycles has helped out team a lot

Aspetti negativi:

There is no particular drawback. This tool has helped us a lot

Rohit
Product Security Governance (India)
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 5.001-10.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Responsive: A tool that makes lives easier

5,0 10 mesi fa

Aspetti positivi:

The way to handle RFP becomes very easy. The content library or the knowledge management platform is where we have benefited a lot.

Aspetti negativi:

The User Interface could be developed and it hangs a bit while loading the content library.

Oscar
Oscar
Sr. Solutions Engineer (USA)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Software informatici, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Great platform for content, project, and knowledge repository!

4,0 anno scorso

Aspetti positivi:

Ability to easily manage and see which projects teammates are working on. Ability to assign sections of proposals/RFPs to specific team members. Ability to import customer RFPs into platform and export easily.

Aspetti negativi:

Sometimes the search may not return what you may be expecting. Tags are a feature which can be used to help you categorize what you are looking for.

Soubhagya
IT Analyst (India)
Telecomunicazioni, 5.001-10.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

One of the best tools that I have used in recent times

5,0 10 mesi fa

Aspetti positivi:

Must say that the workflow management gets really better using this tool. The tool gives option to manage the workflows which has really helped me

Aspetti negativi:

The interface or the user facing side could be updated as it feels a bit old school

Robert
Account Exec (USA)
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Easy to use internal knowledge resource

4,0 anno scorso

Commenti: I am happy to have it and it has been useful.

Aspetti positivi:

The ability to quickly enter a search string and get a result that I may need on a call or need for an RFP. Having that info quick and ready to go is important.

Aspetti negativi:

We have to spend a good amount of time curating the content and this is not a product fault but It highlights the importance of having a resource responsible for this maintenance

Sudeshna
Dev (USA)
Risoluzione alternativa delle controversie, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 1-5 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Responsive team

5,0 6 mesi fa

Aspetti positivi:

responsiveness and alertness and how knowledgeable

Aspetti negativi:

nothing we love responsiveness and alertness and how knowledgeable

Christopher
Proposal Writer (Canada)
Computer e sicurezza della rete, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 1-5 mesi
Fonte della recensione

A Great Content Storage and Organization Resource

4,0 2 anni fa

Commenti: Overall, our experience with RFPIO has been very favourable as it allows us to store, organize, and reuse information repeatedly and efficiently. Organizing the framework of proposals is also very easy and sections can be reordered, added, and removed with ease. A great time saver is the ability to use templates and even clone a previous project to get started quickly.

Aspetti positivi:

What I like most about RFPIO is the ability to store content and knowledge in sections and answer format. Once populated with verified content, it reduces the resources required to compile a standard proposal and the author and reviewer functions streamline team contributions. Custom merge fields, categories, keywords, etc. offer a lot of flexibility over how you organize and retrieve your content.

Aspetti negativi:

Although RFPIO is a great resource for storing and organizing content and knowledge, it's limited control over the formatting of the content means that exporting proposals through multiple iterations can be time consuming. Word templates do a decent job of providing a base look and feel but working with things such as line spacing, tables, etc. is finicky and image quality from RFPIO to Word document to PDF can result in poor end quality. Once I have compiled the bulk of the project and exported to Word, I tend to continue with Word and then am forced to go back and update any content changes in RFPIO to reflect the final results. It is not efficient to make changes and re-export each time.

Amanda
Solution Consultant (USA)
Traduzione e localizzazione, 5.001-10.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

RFPIO Review 2022

4,0 2 anni fa

Commenti: Overall, we have enjoyed using RFPIO and benefited from the system.

Aspetti positivi:

RFPIO provides the workflow automation and a centralized area for customer facing knowledge as expected. The system really has made managing content and bids much more streamlined.

Aspetti negativi:

There are some usability issues (i.e. deleting documents that were previously linked to a Q&A pair, inconstancies with the new and legacy UI functionality, ability to delete comments in the Q&A library, none ideal visibility and filtering for users, etc.). While the system support team is responsive to bug logs, it can take a long time (months) for resolutions or fixes to issues and there is no real proactive communication from our account team.

Iris
RFP Specialist (USA)
Risorse umane, 501-1.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

"I Love RFPIO" - The Words That Come Out of My Mouth Everyday

5,0 6 anni fa

Commenti: My experience has been nothing but positive! So easy to use and when it is not easy, the support team at RFPIO makes it easy for me.

Aspetti positivi:

I do not even know where to begin! RFPIO has changed the way I do proposals forever, and I cannot imagine being without it. It gives me the time to not just meet the RFP requirements, but to actually be able to customize and tailor my responses, something I did not always have the luxury of time to do. It allows me to complete more RFPs than ever before. I cannot even begin to list everything I love about RFPIO, but one thing that stands out is the collaboration aspect and being able to do a first run of answering questions based on what I have in my library, and then being able to assign questions out and follow their activity, It allows me to meet deadlines with a high quality response time and time again. And saves me time!

Aspetti negativi:

I am going to say NOTHING, because anytime I have had an issue or a desire for a new function, the RFPIO team is so responsive and has helped me through or even added a new feature. The one thing I wish it had, and I believe is in development, is a way to check when a draft of an answer is complete, but not marked as answered yet.

Risposta di Responsive (formerly RFPIO)

6 anni fa

Iris, you've been such a great cheerleader for us and we appreciate your kind words very much! We often hear that people save time by using RFPIO, but it's great to hear how you're maximizing that time by turning up the notch on your RFP quality. Thank you for being a wonderful customer!

Lauren
Lauren
Senior Manager, Proposal Department (USA)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Risorse umane, 501-1.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

RFPIO is by far the best RFP software I have ever worked with in my 15+ years of proposal management

5,0 6 anni fa

Commenti: RFPIO's team is so cooperative, and responsive! Their goal is truly to be a partner to us in our RFP efforts.

Aspetti positivi:

RFPIO is flexible and powerful and saves us time. It allows us to fully manage our library of responses, as well as attachments and projects, with easy visibility into what is going on. Even better it allows multiple divisions of our company to manage everything in one system!

Aspetti negativi:

There is nothing we don't like about RFPIO.

Risposta di Responsive (formerly RFPIO)

6 anni fa

Thank you, Lauren! You always have positive words for us, and we can't tell you how much we appreciate it, but we hope we can continue to show you. Cheers to you!

Jeffrey
Marketing Content Manager (USA)
Scrittura e attività redazionali, 1.001-5.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 2 anni
Fonte della recensione

Intuitive, affordable platform

4,0 6 anni fa

Commenti: Overall, RFPIO is a great product. I'm always impressed when I upload a complex source file and the software is able to identify the sections, questions and subquestions. However, I'd love for them to make the question assignment process simpler - I'd like to be able to assign specific questions to someone and still give them visibility on the entire project. Additionally, the multiple team member symbol doesn't indicate which specific members are needed on a specific question. My team members are often confused with the platform, no matter how simple I try to make it for them.

Aspetti positivi:

Answer library, smart file upload functionality

Aspetti negativi:

Assigning questions to different authors is not very clear cut. I find that I need to assign all questions to all team members involved on a response so that they have visibility on the entire project. Otherwise, they can only see the specific questions that are assigned to them.

Risposta di Responsive (formerly RFPIO)

6 anni fa

Thank you for the thoughtful review, Jeffrey. Your feedback on the assignment functionality is really helpful! We'll make sure to share with the product team.

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione, 501-1.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: Più di 1 anno
Fonte della recensione

Great Answer Library with Recommendations Features

4,0 6 anni fa

Commenti: Overall, me and my coworkers have enjoyed using RFPIO, mostly because of the ability to pull from existing Answer Library entries and continue to add to that library over time.

Aspetti positivi:

The Answer Library and how it appears in the Recommendations Panel while working on an active RFP, is the best part about RFPIO.

Aspetti negativi:

Importing and exporting is the trickest and sometimes most time consuming part about RFPIO. I wish there was more flexibility with the import functionality to select and label things. I wish I could more easily give project visibility to people without having to make them an Author/Reviewer, or Project Manager role. Oftentimes, I just want people to be able to see all the sections of a project, without giving them unnecessarily high access. One last "con" would be the email notifications. I know you can queue emails, and change your personal preferences, but it's still adds up to a lot of emails during a large complex project.

Risposta di Responsive (formerly RFPIO)

6 anni fa

Thank you for your review! Your feedback on the import and export functionality is very valuable and we will pass it on to the product team. Thanks again!

Rhonda
Rhonda
Vice President, Digital Health (USA)
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Software informatici, 51-200 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

I can't imagine responding to an RFP without RFPIO ever again!

5,0 6 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

The ease of usability and intuitiveness. A new user can be independent with less than 10 minutes introduction. We recently completed a complex government RFP with over 20 new internally users and multiple external consultants who were all able to quickly and confidently use RFPIO to provide content for our compelling response. The complexity is unimaginable in a historical Word redline version management process.

Aspetti negativi:

Have not found any yet! Wish I would have known about RFPIO sooner.

Risposta di Responsive (formerly RFPIO)

6 anni fa

Thank you for the high marks, Rhonda! We wish we'd known about you sooner too. :) Appreciate the kind words, and we're pleased to know that RFPIO is making things easier for you and all your many collaborators. Looking forward to working with you in the new year!

Utente Verificato
Utente LinkedIn Verificato
Aeronautica e industria aerospaziale, 501-1.000 dipendenti
Ha utilizzato il software per: 6-12 mesi
Fonte della recensione

Amazing product for efficiency

5,0 2 anni fa

Aspetti positivi:

RFPIO makes is simple and more efficient to manage content and workflow.

Aspetti negativi:

Nothing to add at this time. Perhaps, in the future.