--- description: Scopri le funzionalità di Docker, i dettagli del prodotto, chi utilizza il software e quali sono i prodotti suggeriti. Attraverso le recensioni di utenti verificati potrai capire com’è la user experience, l’assistenza post-vendita e molto altro. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Docker - Prezzi, recensioni, informazioni - Capterra Italia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software DevOps](/directory/31120/devops/software) > [Docker](/software/148132/docker) # Docker Canonical: https://www.capterra.it/software/148132/docker Pagina: 1/23\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/148132/docker?page=2) > Docker consente di racchiudere un'applicazione con tutte le sue dipendenze in un'unità standardizzata per lo sviluppo del software. > > Conclusione: valutazione di **4.6/5** stelle assegnate da 537 utenti. Miglior punteggio per il parametro **Lo consiglieresti?**. ----- ## Statistiche e valutazioni | Parametro | Valutazione | Dettaglio | | **Nel complesso** | **4.6/5** | 537 Recensioni | | Facilità d'uso | 4.1/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Assistenza clienti | 4.1/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Rapporto qualità-prezzo | 4.6/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Funzionalità | 4.6/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Percentuale di raccomandazione | 90% | (9/10 Lo consiglieresti?) | ## Informazioni sul fornitore - **Azienda**: Docker ## Contesto commerciale - **Prezzo di partenza**: 7,00 USD - **Modello tariffario**: (Versione di prova gratuita (free trial)) - **Pubblico target**: Lavoratore autonomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementazione e piattaforme**: Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Windows (locale), Linux (locale) - **Lingue supportate**: giapponese, inglese - **Paesi disponibili**: Australia, Austria, Belgio, Canada, Danimarca, Finlandia, Francia, Germania, Giappone, Irlanda, Israele, Italia, Lussemburgo, Norvegia, Nuova Zelanda, Paesi Bassi, Portogallo, RAS di Hong Kong, Regno Unito, Singapore e altri 4 ## Funzionalità - API - Ambiente di sviluppo integrato - Debugging - Gestione del flusso di lavoro - Gestione del rilascio - Interfaccia utente grafica - Monitoraggio - Strumenti collaborativi ## Opzioni di supporto - Email/Help desk - FAQ/Forum ## Categoria - [Software DevOps](https://www.capterra.it/directory/31120/devops/software) ## Categorie correlate - [Software DevOps](https://www.capterra.it/directory/31120/devops/software) - [Software per creare app](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [Software di gestione del ciclo di vita delle applicazioni](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) - [Software per continuous integration](https://www.capterra.it/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) - [Software per la sicurezza dei container](https://www.capterra.it/directory/32916/container-security/software) ## Alternative 1. [Jira](https://www.capterra.it/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15403 reviews) 2. [Essential Studio](https://www.capterra.it/software/32602/essential-studio) — 4.5/5 (932 reviews) 3. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.it/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6184 reviews) 4. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.capterra.it/software/101288/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3006 reviews) 5. [IntelliJ IDEA](https://www.capterra.it/software/136010/intellij-idea) — 4.7/5 (1259 reviews) ## Recensioni ### "Potente e versatile, ma con qualche sfida" — 4.0/5 > **Gabriele** | *30 gennaio 2025* | Sviluppo di programmi | Tasso di raccomandazione: 9.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Docker mi ha colpito per la sua semplicità nel gestire ambienti isolati e portabili. La possibilità di creare, distribuire e scalare applicazioni in modo rapido lo rende essenziale per lo sviluppo moderno. La leggerezza rispetto alle macchine virtuali e l'ecosistema di immagini su Docker Hub sono grandi vantaggi. Perfetto per DevOps > > **Inconvenienti**: Docker, pur essendo potente, ha alcuni svantaggi. Il consumo di risorse può essere elevato, specialmente su sistemi con molteplici container in esecuzione. La gestione del networking può risultare complessa, così come il debugging in ambienti containerizzati ----- ### "Decent container registry services, slow in Singapore, decent price, awesome 3rd party support" — 4.0/5 > **Monica** | *9 giugno 2025* | Telecomunicazioni | Tasso di raccomandazione: 9.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: I love the support. Just about every 3rd party vendor supports Docker. The container registry services are good for the most part. Price is good - no issue on price. > > **Inconvenienti**: Our docker pulls from Asia Pacific, especially Singapore is really really really slow. I ended up using AWS ECR for that region. > > Overall, Docker is well supported, and for the most part reliable. The price is good. However, docker pulls in Singapore are slow. ----- ### "World changing containers and standard de-facto" — 5.0/5 > **Aleksandr** | *9 aprile 2021* | Software informatici | Tasso di raccomandazione: 10.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Great documentation. Easy to use. Exists on any OS and platform you may need it (doesn't work with latest ARM Mac yet, but I believe this is a matter of time). Allows to you to use any software / platform / solution you want without actually installing it on your computer. Docker-compose may ran the whole stack right on your laptop and multistage builds takes care of safe software building. Free docker registry on top of that. Tremendous amount of how-to. > > **Inconvenienti**: Some functionality behaves differently depending on platform. For example - mounted volumes. Some of issues related to file permissions stays there for at least few years. Internal volumes can not be extracted and moved to another computer easily, which somehow defeats it's purpose. Doesn't play well with WSL/WSL2 and especially if you pair it with build in kubernetes. > > Docker was first (I believe) on themarket of containerized software. There was a lot of talks that it is nothing more than an interface to unix cgroups and that docker has no future, this is just hyped piece of software. Time proved them wrong. Docker became a standard solution, participated in Open Container Initiative and while fully comply with all the OCI requirements, docker is used much widely. Container solves library/dll hell - that means that you may have two application that require incompatible libs running on the same computer without any problems. Applications are separated, they can't affect each other, their resource consumption may be tuned using docker tools. You may build proof of concept wiring containers into a single docker-compose and have the whole stack running here. Multi stage build allows to build software which does not have access to any secrets used during build step. You may use tons of software without installing it, just by running them in the docker. ----- ### "Docker has gone the way of the dodo" — 2.0/5 > **Utente Verificato** | *15 maggio 2023* | Software informatici | Tasso di raccomandazione: 3.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: It was awesome the day we replaced it with something else. I suppose it's a good dashboard app for showing off running containers on your workstation. > > **Inconvenienti**: It's too resource intensive, and makes everything else crash when I'm running the containers. I hate how they force you to upgrade to the latest version if you're a freebie, and that usually breaks all my keys on boxes, which means I've got to reset to factory defaults just to use what I already had working. Docker is literally a productivity killer because they think they know more about virtualization than you do and so they push updates and force you to download them and occupy all your hard-drive with bloated containers. > > Started out great, then turned to not-so-great, then eventually GET ME OFF THIS THING.It took them coming out with an Open container initiative to be able to market their product, which is bloated cruftware. There are better options out there. Maybe not as user-friendly, but definitely not as buggy. ----- ### "Great except for massive space hogging" — 4.0/5 > **Daniel** | *27 marzo 2026* | Ospedali e sistemi sanitari | Tasso di raccomandazione: 10.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: We run a monorepo with a microservice architecture in healthcare and Docker runs our local dev workflow. Docker Compose lets us spin up the whole stack locally so devs can test end to end without needing a cloud environment. Then when we deploy to Azure Container Apps its basically the same containers, so theres very little friction between local and prod. Just clone the repo and docker compose up. > > **Inconvenienti**: I have to docker compose prune -a often or else it eats up my entire drive. Today I did it and it freed 500gb. > > Been using Docker for a few years now across multiple projects. Its become a tool I cant imagine working without. ----- Pagina: 1/23\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/148132/docker?page=2) ## Link - [Visualizza su Capterra](https://www.capterra.it/software/148132/docker) ## Questa pagina è disponibile nelle seguenti lingue | Lingua | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Dati strutturati