--- description: Scopri le funzionalità di Apache Cassandra, i dettagli del prodotto, chi utilizza il software e quali sono i prodotti suggeriti. Attraverso le recensioni di utenti verificati potrai capire com’è la user experience, l’assistenza post-vendita e molto altro. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Apache Cassandra - Prezzi, recensioni, informazioni - Capterra Italia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software per la gestione del database](/directory/18/database-management/software) > [Apache Cassandra](/software/148406/apache-cassandra) # Apache Cassandra Canonical: https://www.capterra.it/software/148406/apache-cassandra Pagina: 1/3\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/148406/apache-cassandra?page=2) > Soluzione di gestione di database realizzata per gestire grandi quantità di dati su molti commodity server (di fascia bassa). > > Conclusione: valutazione di **4.2/5** stelle assegnate da 33 utenti. Miglior punteggio per il parametro **Lo consiglieresti?**. ----- ## Panoramica ### Chi utilizza Apache Cassandra? Apache Cassandra è progettato per le organizzazioni, in vari settori, che dispongono di grandi set di dati che cambiano costantemente. ## Statistiche e valutazioni | Parametro | Valutazione | Dettaglio | | **Nel complesso** | **4.2/5** | 33 Recensioni | | Facilità d'uso | 4.0/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Assistenza clienti | 3.7/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Rapporto qualità-prezzo | 4.5/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Funzionalità | 4.2/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Percentuale di raccomandazione | 80% | (8/10 Lo consiglieresti?) | ## Informazioni sul fornitore - **Azienda**: Apache Software Foundation - **Anno di fondazione**: 2011 ## Contesto commerciale - **Modello tariffario**: (Versione gratuita disponibile) - **Pubblico target**: 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementazione e piattaforme**: Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop) - **Paesi disponibili**: Germania ## Funzionalità - Replica di dati - Supporto di più linguaggi di programmazione ## Categoria - [Software per la gestione del database](https://www.capterra.it/directory/18/database-management/software) ## Alternative 1. [Google Cloud](https://www.capterra.it/software/170983/google-cloud-platform) — 4.7/5 (2268 reviews) 2. [Airtable](https://www.capterra.it/software/146652/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2225 reviews) 3. [MySQL](https://www.capterra.it/software/11482/mysql) — 4.6/5 (2094 reviews) 4. [Microsoft SQL Server](https://www.capterra.it/software/1417/sql-server) — 4.6/5 (1975 reviews) 5. [Oracle Database](https://www.capterra.it/software/5938/oracle-database) — 4.6/5 (471 reviews) ## Recensioni ### "Cassandra as an Open Source Database" — 4.0/5 > **Pawe** | *27 agosto 2022* | Ricerca | Tasso di raccomandazione: 7.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: First of all, I am a fan of Open Source projects and I really enjoy working with Apache products. I have used Cassandra for several months for my research project that included storing unstructured data. I found it a little bit more difficult to use than Amazon DynamoDB, but given that it is the open source project I was thoroughly impressed by all the features and the reliability of Cassandra. I would recommend Cassandra for projects using Open Source technologies. It is very fast and met all of the efficiency metrics and agreements for the project I have been developing. > > **Inconvenienti**: I found it a little bit harder to work with compared to MongoDB and DynamoDB. Nevertheless I believe that for an experienced engineer who has worked with Databases before, it will take couple of weeks to get fully fluent with Cassandra docs. ----- ### "cassandra review" — 4.0/5 > **debasis** | *9 giugno 2019* | Telecomunicazioni | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: I like it scales very easily when we see increase it traffic > > **Inconvenienti**: Cassandra does not support joins so it is difficult to use as complex OLTP system ----- ### "It was good, until we hit GC" — 1.0/5 > **Gabriel M.** | *1 luglio 2018* | Internet | Tasso di raccomandazione: 0.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: It was the best NoSQL solution for our organization. decent performance and cross-Datacenter replication. > > **Inconvenienti**: It's written in JAVA. GC was killing us. at some point we had a server on GC for 30 min every 15 min. we had to add more and more servers to deal with the situation. DataStax's PHP driver was using the first server available as a 'Contact point' when it was on GC, the second server on the list was hit and sometimes caused to crash; as result - we had a domino effect and an entire cluster would have crashed. (that, btw, was fixed and now Contact point is random). There is a better alternative \*\*\*SCYLLADB\*\*\*\* Since we moved to Scylla - we were able to reduce the amount of servers by 75%. Performance and stability is magnificent. client side hasn't changed - running with the same drivers. > > We were able to offload tables from our MySQL to NoSQL. ----- ### "A promising and powerful NoSQL database." — 5.0/5 > **Utente Verificato** | *28 gennaio 2018* | Software informatici | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: It is great for the right workload; with heavy writes and eventual consistency, it is a leader in the NoSQL space. I recommend Datastax for support using and supporting it. > > **Inconvenienti**: Maintaining a cluster and an ops center server (for backups and monitoring) can get quite pricey. The learning curve of maintaining a cluster is a bit long. ----- ### "A highly available and a consistent flavour of NoSQL Databases" — 4.0/5 > **Suru** | *21 febbraio 2023* | Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: It is really beneficial for faster write operations and fast read search type queries that can be used in a pipeline with a high velocity of Read/Write operations. Management of data is carried out well by Cassandra and provides replication with its replication factor and replication strategy to prevent data loss. > > **Inconvenienti**: Apache Cassandra is not meant for analytical queries and it cannot perform certain aggregation functions, Joins like other databases can. > > Been using it and will continue to use it for our Data Engineering needs that involves storing of huge amount of data with a lot of r/w operations we perform every week. ----- Pagina: 1/3\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/148406/apache-cassandra?page=2) ## Link - [Visualizza su Capterra](https://www.capterra.it/software/148406/apache-cassandra) ## Questa pagina è disponibile nelle seguenti lingue | Lingua | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Dati strutturati