--- description: Scopri le funzionalità di Microsoft Azure, i dettagli del prodotto, chi utilizza il software e quali sono i prodotti suggeriti. Attraverso le recensioni di utenti verificati potrai capire com’è la user experience, l’assistenza post-vendita e molto altro. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Microsoft Azure - Prezzi, recensioni, informazioni - Capterra Italia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software per creare app](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [Microsoft Azure](/software/16365/azure) # Microsoft Azure Canonical: https://www.capterra.it/software/16365/azure Pagina: 1/80\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/16365/azure?page=2) > Piattaforma di cloud computing per la creazione di macchine virtuali, la creazione e l'esecuzione di applicazioni basate sul web, applicazioni client intelligenti e servizi web XML. > > Conclusione: valutazione di **4.6/5** stelle assegnate da 1958 utenti. Miglior punteggio per il parametro **Lo consiglieresti?**. ----- ## Panoramica ### Chi utilizza Microsoft Azure? Il principio di base è che il successo reso possibile dal cloud debba essere accessibile a tutte le imprese e a tutte le organizzazioni ‑ piccole e grandi, vecchie e nuove. ## Statistiche e valutazioni | Parametro | Valutazione | Dettaglio | | **Nel complesso** | **4.6/5** | 1958 Recensioni | | Facilità d'uso | 4.2/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Assistenza clienti | 4.2/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Rapporto qualità-prezzo | 4.2/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Funzionalità | 4.6/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Percentuale di raccomandazione | 80% | (8/10 Lo consiglieresti?) | ## Informazioni sul fornitore - **Azienda**: Microsoft - **Area geografica**: Redmond, USA - **Anno di fondazione**: 1975 ## Contesto commerciale - **Prezzo di partenza**: 31,39 USD - **Modello tariffario**: (Versione gratuita disponibile) (Versione di prova gratuita (free trial)) - **Pubblico target**: Lavoratore autonomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementazione e piattaforme**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Lingue supportate**: cinese, coreano, danese, francese, inglese, italiano, olandese, polacco, portoghese, russo, spagnolo, svedese, tedesco, turco - **Paesi disponibili**: Australia, Canada, Cina, Germania, Giappone, India, Regno Unito, Stati Uniti ## Funzionalità - API - Accesso al registro - Accesso/Controllo remoto - Ambiente di sviluppo integrato - Autenticazione Multifattore - Backup e ripristino - Bilanciamento del carico - Controllo accessi/Autorizzazioni - Creazione di report/analisi - Dashboard - Debugging - Gestione BYOL - Gestione ciclo di vita API - Gestione dei dispositivi - Gestione dei test - Gestione dell'accordo sul livello di servizio (SLA) - Gestione della configurazione - Gestione delle applicazioni - Gestione delle implementazioni - Gestione polizze - Interfaccia utente grafica - Migrazione di dati - Monitoraggio della rete - Monitoraggio delle prestazioni - Monitoraggio di macchine virtuali - Progettazione API - Prova di compatibilità - Provisioning utenti - Scalability - Server virtuale - Sicurezza dei dati - Strumenti collaborativi - Third-Party Integrations - Virtualizzazione del desktop ## Integrazioni (6 in totale) - Citrix Workspace - GitHub - Microsoft 365 - Nerdio - Retrace by Netreo - Visual Studio Code ## Opzioni di supporto - Email/Help desk - FAQ/Forum - Knowledge Base - Assistenza diretta 24 ore su 24 - Chat ## Categoria - [Software per creare app](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## Categorie correlate - [Software per creare app](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [Software per la gestione delle API](https://www.capterra.it/directory/31065/api-management/software) - [Software per macchine virtuali](https://www.capterra.it/directory/31078/virtual-machine/software) - [Software VDI](https://www.capterra.it/directory/31996/vdi/software) - [Software IaaS](https://www.capterra.it/directory/32015/infrastructure-as-a-service-solutions/software) ## Alternative 1. [Essential Studio](https://www.capterra.it/software/32602/essential-studio) — 4.5/5 (929 reviews) 2. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.it/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6179 reviews) 3. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.capterra.it/software/101288/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3006 reviews) 4. [Jira](https://www.capterra.it/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15388 reviews) 5. [IntelliJ IDEA](https://www.capterra.it/software/136010/intellij-idea) — 4.7/5 (1257 reviews) ## Recensioni ### "Excellent end-to-end cloud solutions that come at a cost" — 5.0/5 > **Sofia** | *16 gennaio 2025* | Software informatici | Tasso di raccomandazione: 9.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: There is a wide variety of components, ranging from Infrastructure as a Sevice (IaaS) to Software as a Service (SaaS) and Platform as a Service (PaaS). You can get a project or a pilot up and running in minutes, with everything you need, in a modular way. The services I find more useful (apart virtual machines) are Application Insights and Docker Image Registries, two components that tipically take a lot of effort to set up on premises. > > **Inconvenienti**: Unfortunately if you have Azure bulk credits because you participate in some Microsoft programs, there is currently no way to set budget alerts or thresholds, so you must keep an eye on usage. Also, OpenAI costs are still high compared to competition. ----- ### "Powerful cloud platform but a bit complex to learn" — 4.0/5 > **Harshul** | *15 aprile 2026* | Servizi e tecnologie dell'informazione | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: What I like most about Azure is how many services it gives in one place. At work we use it for VMs, storage and some app hosting, and it’s pretty reliable once everything is set up right. The dashboard is clean and I can find most things without digging too much. Scaling resources is easy, I can bump things up or down without restarting whole systems. The monitoring tools help a lot when something is acting weird. I also like that it connects well with other Microsoft tools we already use, so it fits into our workflow without extra steps. > > **Inconvenienti**: Some parts of Azure feel confusing, especially when you’re trying to set up something new. There are too many menus and sometimes I forget where a setting is. Pricing can get tricky too, because small things add up fast if you don’t watch usage. A few times deployments failed for no clear reason and I had to redo them. Debugging errors isn’t always straightforward, the messages can be vague. Also the portal can be slow at times, especially when switching between services. > > Overall my experience with Azure has been good for day‑to‑day work. We use it for hosting apps, running VMs and storing data, and it handles most tasks without issues. Once things are configured properly it runs stable, but the setup part can take time and patience. I like the flexibility and the amount of tools available, but sometimes it feels like too much to learn at once. Still, it saves us time compared to managing everything on‑prem. For cloud work it’s been reliable and gets the job done. ----- ### "A natural cloud extension to the Microsoft stack" — 4.0/5 > **connor** | *16 aprile 2026* | Produzione di media | Tasso di raccomandazione: 6.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Azure fits comfortably into environments that are already ebedded into the Microsoft ecosystem, with Active Directory etc - especially through Entra and hybrid setups. It allows easier extension to existing authentication and permissions, and policies can be remodeled into the cloud rather than recreating entirely from scratch. As a cloud provider it is quite mature and broad, so once the foundations are in place it can cover the vast majority of infrastructure needs within their ecosystem. > > **Inconvenienti**: Azure can often feel like an extension of the on-premise microsoft stack rather than a standalone addition, which in some cases is good but in others restrictive. If you are used to ADDS on-prem, many features and interactions will feel familiar, but added cloud services and policy layers, joined with pricing models, can add a lot of extra complexity. > > Overall, Azure is at its strongest when integrated alongside existing Microsoft infrastructure. Its similarities to Active Directory provide a real advantage for organisations that already leverage or are familiar with microsoft tools, helping to soften any move towards cloud operations. With that in mind however, as with all of the major cloud providers, its ecosystem is vast and easy to mismanage if you don't keep a strict eye on resource cost and configurations. ----- ### "Azure review" — 3.0/5 > **Utente Verificato** | *13 marzo 2026* | Computer e sicurezza della rete | Tasso di raccomandazione: 6.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Extremely powerful and flexible cloud platform. Strong security and infrastructure options and scales well for complex or enterprise‑level environments. Integrates well with other Microsoft products. > > **Inconvenienti**: Pricing is complex and can escalate quickly, making budgeting difficult. Frequent platform changes increase the administrative burden thus requires significant technical expertise to manage properly. Overkill for organizations that don’t need enterprise‑level cloud services. > > Microsoft Azure is a very powerful cloud platform, but it was more than we needed and became difficult and expensive to manage over time. We ultimately moved off Azure to a private hosting cloud solution because costs were hard to predict and the platform changed frequently, making administration challenging. ----- ### "Azure - Engi" — 5.0/5 > **Utente Verificato** | *17 aprile 2026* | Computer e sicurezza della rete | Tasso di raccomandazione: 10.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: I enjoy using Azure to stand up and host infrastructure because it provides a flexible and scalable platform that aligns well with modern cloud design principles. The integration of RBAC with Entra ID makes access control seamless, allowing me to manage permissions in a centralized and secure way. I also appreciate how easy it is to deploy and manage resources using Infrastructure as Code, which helps ensure consistency and repeatability across environments. Overall, Azure simplifies both the deployment and governance of infrastructure, making it a reliable choice for building robust systems. > > **Inconvenienti**: While I do occasionally run into bugs or platform quirks, the overall experience and capabilities Azure provides still make it a strong choice for building and managing infrastructure. Microsoft's support can sometimes be slow to resolve issues. This is dependent on your support plan. > > Overall, my experience using Azure to build and host infrastructure has been very positive due to its strong balance of scalability, security, and ease of management. The seamless integration of RBAC with Entra ID simplifies identity and access control, making it easier to enforce least-privilege principles across environments. I’ve found that deploying resources through Infrastructure as Code is straightforward and efficient, which helps streamline workflows and maintain consistency. While there are occasional bugs or unexpected issues, they are typically manageable and outweighed by the platform’s robust capabilities and continuous improvements. ----- Pagina: 1/80\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/16365/azure?page=2) ## Link - [Visualizza su Capterra](https://www.capterra.it/software/16365/azure) ## Questa pagina è disponibile nelle seguenti lingue | Lingua | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Dati strutturati