--- description: Scopri le funzionalità di Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite, i dettagli del prodotto, chi utilizza il software e quali sono i prodotti suggeriti. Attraverso le recensioni di utenti verificati potrai capire com’è la user experience, l’assistenza post-vendita e molto altro. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite - Prezzi, recensioni, informazioni - Capterra Italia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software EDC](/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) > [Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite](/software/192454/research-manager) # Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite Canonical: https://www.capterra.it/software/192454/research-manager Pagina: 1/6\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/192454/research-manager?page=2) > Aggiunta di valore ai dati. Research Manager offre una piattaforma di ricerca in cui sono integrati la gestione dei processi e la raccolta dei dati. > > Conclusione: valutazione di **4.2/5** stelle assegnate da 118 utenti. Miglior punteggio per il parametro **Lo consiglieresti?**. ----- ## Panoramica ### Chi utilizza Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite? Tutte le ricerche e i professionisti delle scienze biologiche e delle sperimentazioni cliniche. ## Statistiche e valutazioni | Parametro | Valutazione | Dettaglio | | **Nel complesso** | **4.2/5** | 118 Recensioni | | Facilità d'uso | 4.0/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Assistenza clienti | 4.0/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Rapporto qualità-prezzo | 4.1/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Funzionalità | 4.0/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Percentuale di raccomandazione | 80% | (8/10 Lo consiglieresti?) | ## Informazioni sul fornitore - **Azienda**: Cloud9-Software - **Area geografica**: Deventer, Paesi Bassi - **Anno di fondazione**: 2013 ## Contesto commerciale - **Pubblico target**: Lavoratore autonomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementazione e piattaforme**: Cloud, SaaS, Web - **Lingue supportate**: inglese, olandese, tedesco - **Paesi disponibili**: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua e Barbuda, Arabia Saudita, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaigian, Bahamas, Bahrein, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belgio, Belize e altri 204 ## Funzionalità - Acquisizione dati da remoto - Acquisizione di immagini - Acquisizione distribuita - Acquisizione elettronica dei dati - Cartelle cliniche in formato elettronico - Classificazione di documenti - Conforme alla legge HIPAA - Conformità 21 CFR Part 11 - Creazione di report/analisi - Digitalizzazione di documenti - Disegno di studio - Gestione dei moduli - Gestione dei pazienti - Gestione del flusso di lavoro - Gestione dell'inventario - Gestione della conformità - Gestione di documenti - Gestione finanziaria - Importazione/Esportazione di dati - Monitoraggio dei pazienti - Programmazione - Reclutamento dei pazienti - Third-Party Integrations - Tracciato di controllo ## Integrazioni (10 in totale) - AFAS Software - Clue - ExactSpent - Fitbit - Freestyle Solutions - Polar - Samsung SDS - Wahoo Trace - Whoop - Zwift ## Opzioni di supporto - Email/Help desk - FAQ/Forum - Knowledge Base - Assistenza telefonica - Assistenza diretta 24 ore su 24 - Chat ## Categoria - [Software EDC](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) ## Categorie correlate - [Software EDC](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) - [Software per studi clinici](https://www.capterra.it/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) - [Programmi per inserimento dati](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30543/data-entry/software) ## Alternative 1. [ShareCRF](https://www.capterra.it/software/1031214/sharecrf) — 4.8/5 (44 reviews) 2. [Florence eBinders](https://www.capterra.it/software/200364/florence-ebinders) — 4.5/5 (83 reviews) 3. [Castor EDC](https://www.capterra.it/software/143532/castor-edc) — 4.7/5 (204 reviews) 4. [Flex Databases platform](https://www.capterra.it/software/124010/flex-databases-platform) — 4.5/5 (13 reviews) 5. [Health Cloud](https://www.capterra.it/software/172299/health-cloud) — 4.4/5 (45 reviews) ## Recensioni ### "Excellent software" — 5.0/5 > **Utente Verificato** | *2 settembre 2023* | Ospedali e sistemi sanitari | Tasso di raccomandazione: 10.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Can exchange data with other research teams, even those working on projects at different trial sites.Provides the ability for electronic signatures, making it simpler to get informed approval from study participants and record it. > > **Inconvenienti**: Time consuming when transferring large data set from the application ----- ### "Descent EDC" — 4.0/5 > **Noudjoum** | *24 giugno 2026* | Industria farmaceutica | Tasso di raccomandazione: 6.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: I liked the ease of use of it, the validation steps were easy and not too much complainte from the sites about data entry. The reporting is good. > > **Inconvenienti**: The roles \! They are all prédéfined in the system and cannot be customized, the query management is not convenient, and the customer service is in Rurope which made it difficult for urgent matters. > > I run three studies on it and the three of them run smoothly. Data entry was easy, data validation was easy too. The lock and data extraction were also straight forward. ----- ### "User-friendly system with potential for improvement" — 3.0/5 > **Marta** | *25 giugno 2026* | Ospedali e sistemi sanitari | Tasso di raccomandazione: 5.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: What I liked most about ResearchManager is that, from a monitor’s perspective, the system is quite intuitive and easy to navigate. The layout is clear and logical, which makes it relatively easy to find the necessary information. > > **Inconvenienti**: From a monitor’s perspective, the weakest point is that SDV can only be performed for closed visits, and only at the page level rather than for individual data points. In other systems, I have seen a more practical solution where each data point has a default status of “SDV not performed”, which can then be changed to “SDV performed” or “SDV not OK”. If “SDV performed” is selected and the site subsequently changes the entered data, the status automatically changes to “Data changed after SDV”. In my opinion, this functionality greatly facilitates monitoring and the tracking of all data changes. Another problematic aspect is the lack of possibility to raise queries in empty visits. In such cases, I have to contact the site separately by email and provide screenshots from the eCRF to indicate the missing data. It would also be very helpful if the query status were clearly visible, i.e. whether a query has already been addressed and closed or whether it still requires action. Currently, it is only visible that a query has been raised for a given parameter, but the actual status is not clear. In addition, in the query list, it would be very useful to see the specific queries linked to specific parameters, rather than only the sections in which the queries were raised. If there are many parameters and several queries, it is easy to overlook one of them. > > Overall, my experience has been positive. I find the system quite intuitive and easy to work with, but I think some improvements, especially in SDV and query management, could make it even better :) ----- ### "Easy of use in multicenter trials" — 5.0/5 > **Mikko** | *24 giugno 2026* | Ospedali e sistemi sanitari | Tasso di raccomandazione: 8.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Everything in order and in the same place. Easy to access form anywhere and esay to learn how to use. Makes performing a trial a lot easier. > > **Inconvenienti**: The automatic query, when missed filling a required field- would be nicer to remind that nort all required fields are filled yet, do you really want to "save as complete"? > > I use it regularly in a multicenter- trial as a head of corelab. Although all the parties involved are located in different countries, this no longer makes any difference. ----- ### "Efficient Clinical Research Management Platform with Strong Workflow Capabilities" — 4.0/5 > **Mateusz** | *11 giugno 2026* | Ricerca | Tasso di raccomandazione: 6.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: The platform helps centralize study management activities in one place, improving collaboration between research teams. I particularly appreciated the document management functionality, workflow support, and the ability to track study progress efficiently. The system promotes better organization and transparency across research projects. > > **Inconvenienti**: The user interface can feel somewhat complex for first-time users, and some advanced functions are not immediately intuitive. Additional customization options for reports and dashboards would be beneficial. The initial setup and onboarding process may require dedicated training. > > Overall, my experience with Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite has been positive. The platform provides a comprehensive environment for managing research activities and helps streamline administrative and operational tasks. While there is a learning curve, the benefits in terms of organization, compliance support, and workflow efficiency outweigh the challenges. It is a valuable solution for research organizations seeking to improve study management processes. ----- Pagina: 1/6\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/192454/research-manager?page=2) ## Link - [Visualizza su Capterra](https://www.capterra.it/software/192454/research-manager) ## Questa pagina è disponibile nelle seguenti lingue | Lingua | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Dati strutturati