--- description: Scopri le funzionalità di myAvatar, i dettagli del prodotto, chi utilizza il software e quali sono i prodotti suggeriti. Attraverso le recensioni di utenti verificati potrai capire com’è la user experience, l’assistenza post-vendita e molto altro. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: myAvatar - Prezzi, recensioni, informazioni - Capterra Italia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software per la gestione delle cartelle cliniche](/directory/20028/electronic-medical-records/software) > [myAvatar](/software/209716/myavatar) # myAvatar Canonical: https://www.capterra.it/software/209716/myavatar Pagina: 1/3\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/209716/myavatar?page=2) > myAvatar di Netsmart è una cartella clinica elettronica progettata specificamente per le organizzazioni che forniscono servizi di salute comportamentale e di trattamento delle dipendenze. > > Conclusione: valutazione di **2.3/5** stelle assegnate da 37 utenti. Miglior punteggio per il parametro **Lo consiglieresti?**. ----- ## Statistiche e valutazioni | Parametro | Valutazione | Dettaglio | | **Nel complesso** | **2.3/5** | 37 Recensioni | | Facilità d'uso | 2.2/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Assistenza clienti | 2.3/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Rapporto qualità-prezzo | 2.2/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Funzionalità | 2.3/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Percentuale di raccomandazione | 30% | (3/10 Lo consiglieresti?) | ## Informazioni sul fornitore - **Azienda**: Netsmart Technologies - **Area geografica**: Overland Park, USA - **Anno di fondazione**: 1968 ## Contesto commerciale - **Pubblico target**: Lavoratore autonomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementazione e piattaforme**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Windows (locale), Linux (locale) - **Lingue supportate**: inglese - **Paesi disponibili**: Stati Uniti ## Funzionalità - Assistenza di programmazione - Cartelle cliniche in formato elettronico - Creazione di grafici - Fatturazione per consulenze mediche - Gestione delle cartelle cliniche - Medication Management - Pagamento elettronico - Piano di trattamento - Prescrizione elettronica - Programmazione appuntamenti - Rendicontazione e analisi statistiche - Supporto decisionale - Valutazioni iniziali ## Integrazioni (1 in totale) - CardConnect ## Opzioni di supporto - Email/Help desk - Assistenza telefonica ## Categoria - [Software per la gestione delle cartelle cliniche](https://www.capterra.it/directory/20028/electronic-medical-records/software) ## Categorie correlate - [Software per la gestione delle cartelle cliniche](https://www.capterra.it/directory/20028/electronic-medical-records/software) - [Software per la salute mentale](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30217/mental-health/software) - [Software per cartelle cliniche elettroniche per la salute mentale](https://www.capterra.it/directory/32510/mental-health-ehr-software/software) - [Software per cartelle cliniche elettroniche (centri di disintossicazione)](https://www.capterra.it/directory/32708/substance-abuse-emr/software) - [Software per registri terapeutici](https://www.capterra.it/directory/32668/therapy-notes/software) ## Alternative 1. [EHRYourWay](https://www.capterra.it/software/118789/ehr-your-way) — 4.9/5 (527 reviews) 2. [SimplePractice](https://www.capterra.it/software/130710/simplepractice) — 4.6/5 (2823 reviews) 3. [BestNotes](https://www.capterra.it/software/73807/bestnotes) — 4.5/5 (198 reviews) 4. [TheraNest](https://www.capterra.it/software/130400/theranest-mental-health) — 4.4/5 (1030 reviews) 5. [CounSol.com](https://www.capterra.it/software/124769/counsol-com) — 4.7/5 (829 reviews) ## Recensioni ### "Robust Software" — 4.0/5 > **Brett** | *15 febbraio 2018* | Salute mentale | Tasso di raccomandazione: 7.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: The feature sets are nice. They provide both outpatient and inpatient features. They offer the ability to customize exiating forms or create your own. > > **Inconvenienti**: The solution is java based and can be slow. Could require a lot of maintenance by IT staff if not in a Citrix type emvironment. > > Robust feature set makes it very flexible solution ----- ### "myCrapatar" — 1.0/5 > **Faith** | *22 maggio 2022* | Ospedali e sistemi sanitari | Tasso di raccomandazione: 0.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: There is very little to like. I have used other systems and all are better. I cannot even say it is reliable. > > **Inconvenienti**: Not reliable, crashes and runs slow with page load lags, patient information is fragmented, script ordering has a poor display and the history is organized by month, day, then year - it is IMPOSSIBLE to view prescription history in chronological order (needs to be year, month, day)- patient safety risk in my opinion. Labs do not display correct dates - displays the date reviewed not date resulted (leads to patient safety risk). There is not a simple way to do anything in this system. You must approve each note you submit and then click away many pop-ups for menial things like “note filed” (just why?\!). If I was to work somewhere else, I would not go to work for a company that had this software. It is driving me to want to find a company that uses something else. ----- ### "Avatar for Mental Health EHR" — 2.0/5 > **Brittany** | *11 luglio 2024* | Ospedali e sistemi sanitari | Tasso di raccomandazione: 3.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Ability to make templates, drop down bar at top to see other encounters, customizable home screen, autosaves notes into draft > > **Inconvenienti**: Does not automatically carry over information such as past medical history from one note to another within an episode (admission), does not automatically import lab results into note, not connected with a lot of other medical facilities to see outside visits/notes ----- ### "Barely better than paper" — 1.0/5 > **Nathan** | *17 novembre 2021* | Salute mentale | Tasso di raccomandazione: 0.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: Avatar was the upgrade from our previous software SATIS, about 15 years ago. That felt like an upgrade compared to the MS-DOS like UI of SATIS. > > **Inconvenienti**: Slow and clunky. Frequent outages would paralyze our ability to work. Running simple reports with few pages can take 30 minutes, and that may be on a fast day. We were just recently "upgraded" to the NX version, and wow...never have I seen an upgrade be such a downgrade. It's as if they surveyed users to find out what functions were most beneficial to an efficient workflow, then made a conscious effort to take them out...literally. There is no evident benefit to the upgrade other than a visual refresh. Efficiency was clearly not a focus as it now takes more time and work to complete tasks that could be done from the home screen. The scheduling calendar looks like it open 3-4 different pages before then looking like Netflix on shoddy wifi on a Friday night. Some information that used to be visible in one click has been made impossible to access without running a massively time consuming report for a few lines of info. Someone coming from paper charting might decide paper isn't too bad. The best part of NX is that it made me realize that the previous version wasn't so bad. I would only suggest it to people looking to frustrate their employees into resignation. I could blame my employer for choosing to go live with it in it's current state, but this is Netsmart's product, and it's horrible. > > It's made me very jealous of providers that use Epic. It looks nice, it's fast, and it seems to be laid out logically with the user in mind. ----- ### "Designer clearly never worked in the field" — 2.0/5 > **Randa** | *23 settembre 2021* | Salute, benessere e fitness | Tasso di raccomandazione: 0.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: ???? Cool name? I can't think of anything this program does that is not better provided by other software. > > **Inconvenienti**: The 72 hour deadline ensures that most people are putting in poorly witten and spelled garbage, because in real life emergencies happen and you can't always plan enough time for documentation on a giver day. The program is unwieldy to use: there is no way to set defaults to save time or enter multiple notes on one client without have to search the client, and enter all the same information again. You can't easily correct or add to a note once submitted. It's not user friendly- the software is sloppy. It is very difficult to find anything once you have put it in unless you know who entered it and the exact date. For the first time in over 30 years in the field, I almost never check notes , because it is no difficult to find anything. More than half of the note that comes up is repetitiuos garbage in tiny print, if you do make the effort, so it is hard to find the info that was input. If you enter anythingincorrectly in the calendar, you lose all the data and have to start over. In some reports you have to enter your last name and first initial, on others you get an error message if you enter your first initial. Some common client names are glitchy and do not come up when you search, so you have to look up their record number. > > I can't imagine why anyone would want to buy it. ----- Pagina: 1/3\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/209716/myavatar?page=2) ## Link - [Visualizza su Capterra](https://www.capterra.it/software/209716/myavatar) ## Questa pagina è disponibile nelle seguenti lingue | Lingua | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | it | | ----- ## Dati strutturati