--- description: Scopri le funzionalità di RevenueCat, i dettagli del prodotto, chi utilizza il software e quali sono i prodotti suggeriti. Attraverso le recensioni di utenti verificati potrai capire com’è la user experience, l’assistenza post-vendita e molto altro. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: RevenueCat - Prezzi, recensioni, informazioni - Capterra Italia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software per la gestione degli abbonamenti](/directory/31657/subscription-management/software) > [RevenueCat](/software/212540/revenuecat) # RevenueCat Canonical: https://www.capterra.it/software/212540/revenuecat Pagina: 1/3\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/212540/revenuecat?page=2) > La piattaforma di abbonamento per app mobili > > Conclusione: valutazione di **4.7/5** stelle assegnate da 47 utenti. Miglior punteggio per il parametro **Lo consiglieresti?**. ----- ## Panoramica ### Chi utilizza RevenueCat? Applicazioni per dispositivi mobili ## Statistiche e valutazioni | Parametro | Valutazione | Dettaglio | | **Nel complesso** | **4.7/5** | 47 Recensioni | | Facilità d'uso | 4.7/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Assistenza clienti | 4.4/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Rapporto qualità-prezzo | 4.4/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Funzionalità | 4.6/5 | Sulla base delle recensioni complessive | | Percentuale di raccomandazione | 90% | (9/10 Lo consiglieresti?) | ## Informazioni sul fornitore - **Azienda**: RevenueCat ## Contesto commerciale - **Modello tariffario**: (Versione gratuita disponibile) (Versione di prova gratuita (free trial)) - **Pubblico target**: Lavoratore autonomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementazione e piattaforme**: Cloud, SaaS, Web - **Lingue supportate**: inglese - **Paesi disponibili**: Australia, Canada, Francia, Germania, India, Irlanda, Israele, Messico, Portogallo, Regno Unito, Russia, Spagna, Stati Uniti, Sudafrica, Svezia ## Funzionalità - Catalogo di prodotti - Contabilizzazione dei ricavi - Fatturazione ricorrente multi-periodo - Fatture ricorrenti e abbonamenti - Gestione degli sconti - Gestione dei piani di abbonamento - Gestione delle cancellazioni - Gestione di abbonamenti - Iscrizioni/Onboarding - Monitoraggio/analisi dell'uso - Opzioni di pagamento multiple - Portale self-service - Third-Party Integrations ## Integrazioni (16 in totale) - Adjust - Amazon S3 - Amplitude - AppsFlyer - Branch - CleverTap - Google Cloud - Intercom - Mixpanel - OneSignal - Segment - Slack - SplitMetrics Acquire - Stripe - Tenjin ... e altre 1 integrazioni ## Opzioni di supporto - Email/Help desk - FAQ/Forum - Knowledge Base - Chat ## Categoria - [Software per la gestione degli abbonamenti](https://www.capterra.it/directory/31657/subscription-management/software) ## Categorie correlate - [Software per la gestione degli abbonamenti](https://www.capterra.it/directory/31657/subscription-management/software) - [Software per editoria](https://www.capterra.it/directory/20020/publishing-and-subscriptions/software) - [Software di fatturazione ricorrente](https://www.capterra.it/directory/30927/recurring-billing/software) - [Software SaaS](https://www.capterra.it/directory/31639/saas-management/software) ## Alternative 1. [Chargebee](https://www.capterra.it/software/131433/chargebee) — 4.2/5 (104 reviews) 2. [Subbly](https://www.capterra.it/software/144363/subbly) — 4.8/5 (216 reviews) 3. [Stripe Billing](https://www.capterra.it/software/178774/stripe-billing) — 4.7/5 (203 reviews) 4. [DealHub](https://www.capterra.it/software/172031/dealhub) — 4.7/5 (95 reviews) 5. [Recurly](https://www.capterra.it/software/122700/recurly-subscription-billing) — 4.6/5 (62 reviews) ## Recensioni ### "Best service for in-app purchases" — 5.0/5 > **Utente Verificato** | *23 gennaio 2025* | Software informatici | Tasso di raccomandazione: 10.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: The simplicity to setup in-app purchases for mobile apps and the pricing > > **Inconvenienti**: Really I don't know what to say here. Maybe the cheaper plan could have a bit more features? > > Really happy with it, I like their documentations and the ease of use ----- ### "Using RevenueCat server from app inception to release to the App Store" — 5.0/5 > **Sudipto** | *16 luglio 2021* | Tempo libero, viaggi e turismo | Tasso di raccomandazione: 10.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: The integration mechanism into swift code base is detailed in RevenueCat docs. This made it possible to successfully integrate it. It is very helpful that testing in the sandbox is possible using a sandbox user > > **Inconvenienti**: The concepts of Entitlements, Offerings, Products is difficult to memorize. It's good that RevenueCat has readily available detailed documentation to cover these concepts > > The integration is stable. Once coded, I seldom need to revisit it. So, it's now a seamless experience for my users and the app ----- ### "Simple Solution for In-App Subscriptions" — 5.0/5 > **Dakota** | *20 gennaio 2022* | Software informatici | Tasso di raccomandazione: 10.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: RevenueCat made it really easy for us to implement In-App Subscriptions for our app with absolutely no prior experience in taking payments on mobile devices. It saved us the upfront cost of paying for our own server to verify purchases along with the potential months of headache to handle all of the different scenarios you need to plan for and handle with in-app purchases (buying, renewing, pausing, canceling, etc.) Being able to pull information directly from RevenueCat instead of hard-coding it into our app also meant we could have a single source of truth (the App Store/Google Play Store) where we would update our available products. > > **Inconvenienti**: The only thing I wasn't a fan of (which has since been changed) was the payment model. When we first integrated it, the payment model was a fixed monthly rate versus the percentage cut that it is now. Extremely useful features like webhooks weren't accessible for us at the time because of this, but as I stated they've now changed this. Because of that, I cannot name anything I dislike about RevenueCat. > > We turned to RevenueCat because of the hassle that exists trying to verify purchases manually. Doing this ourselves would mean setting up a server, handling all the different cases across the App Store and Play Store, and making sure this server is maintained and always live. For a small team like ours, this just wasn't viable and any potential money "saved" doing it ourselves would be lost in the time we would spend setting up our own solution. That would also mean extra time before an app can be released which would increase our time to market. RevenueCat handled everything we needed it to and took about a week to fully integrate. ----- ### "Great idea, terrible execution and terrible support" — 1.0/5 > **Robert** | *12 gennaio 2025* | Software informatici | Tasso di raccomandazione: 0.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: I like the idea of it, and the fact that it could consolidate.your monetisation strategy. (When it works correctly) > > **Inconvenienti**: The support is terrible, the documentation is terrible. > > It takes a lot for me to leave a bad review. RevenueCat is a great idea, but poorly executed. The documentation is scatty, their API is inconsistent, there has been 2 sets of downtime since I signed up and the level of support from RevenueCat is absolutely unacceptable. For a company that takes a 1% cut of your revenue forever—potentially up to thousands of dollars per month—this is beyond ridiculous. 5-10 business days for an email response? If I’m lucky, maybe 2-3 days. Their documentation is a joke, basically saying to try the obvious and failing that “Go ask someone else on the forums” And their forums? Just a graveyard of unanswered posts with people begging for updates. I’ve been stuck trying to fix Android issues for over a week. I’m confident my setup is correct, but still, nothing works. Getting any kind of timely help from RevenueCat is like pulling teeth. I even wasted time in one of their Q\&A sessions on the recommendation of their support team, which was nothing more than a shameless product pitch. Their exact words: “We aren’t answering implementation questions today.” despite half of the people on the session voting for implementation help. It’s clear to me that RevenueCat doesn’t prioritise supporting their customers. Their strategy is obvious—sign up as many people as possible, then leave them hanging. When our success is literally their success, how can they justify this level of neglect? It’s infuriating. ----- ### "I Need RevenueCat" — 5.0/5 > **Utente Verificato** | *15 dicembre 2020* | E-learning | Tasso di raccomandazione: 10.0/10 > > **Vantaggi**: I have to chose 1 thing? I can't. 1. I love how you built this for hardworking app developers. You saw the unmet need and you filled it with love. 2. I love your response from your team when I have a question or problem. 3. I love how you offer a very affordable service and when we want more features you hook us so we have to pay more but we like it ;) > > **Inconvenienti**: Better communication with Apple when we update our price of subscription. Have that reflect on our charts side. > > Over all I am 100% happy. I can continue to be happy when you keep iterating as we all must in the subscription world. ----- Pagina: 1/3\ Avanti: [Pagina successiva](https://www.capterra.it/software/212540/revenuecat?page=2) ## Link - [Visualizza su Capterra](https://www.capterra.it/software/212540/revenuecat) ## Questa pagina è disponibile nelle seguenti lingue | Lingua | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | sv | | ----- ## Dati strutturati